The wide adoption of dynamic second-price auctions as the format of choice for Internet-based (online) transactions has created an interest in understanding how individuals behave in such environments. The current work concentrates on two dynamic effects, which we call quasi-endowment and opponent effect, and finds that these effects may result in over-bidding. The results of two experimental auctions—one involving hypothetical bids and the other real-money bids—demonstrate that bids reflect valuations that include the nonnormative influences of the two factors. Quasi-endowment and opponent effects could lead to the behaviors of repeated bidding and sniping commonly observed in second-price online auctions such as eBay.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArielyD.OckenfelsA.RothA.An Experimental Analysis of Ending Rules in Internet Auctions (Working Paper)2004MITCambridge, MA
2.
ArielyD.SimonsonI.Buying, Bidding, Playing or Competing?: Value Assessment and Decision Dynamics in Online AuctionsJournal of Consumer Psychology131–22003113–123
3.
BajariP.HortacsuA.Cyberspace Auctions and Pricing Issues: A Survey of Empirical FindingsJonesD.New Economy Handbook2003Academic PressSan Diego, CA163–211Chap. 7
4.
BajariP.HortacsuA.Economic Insights From Internet AuctionsJournal of Economic Literature4222004457–486June
5.
Bar-HillelM.NeterE.Why Are People Reluctant To Exchange Lottery TicketsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology70199617–27January
6.
BegganJ.K.On the Social Nature of Nonsocial Perception: The Mere Ownership EffectJournal of Personality and Social Psychology6221992229–237
7.
BegganJ.K.ScottA.More There Than Meets Their Eyes: Support of the Mere Ownership EffectJournal of Consumer Psychology531997285–297
8.
BemD.J.An Experimental Analysis of Self- PersuasionJournal of Experimental Social Psychology131965199–218
9.
BettmanJ.R.LuceM.F.PayneJ.W.Constructive Consumer Choice ProcessesJournal of Consumer Research251998187–217December
10.
CarmonZ.ArielyD.Focusing on the Foregone: How Value Can Appear So Different to Buyers and SellersJournal of Consumer Research2732000360–370
11.
CialdiniR.Influence: Science and Practice4th ed.2001Allyn & BaconBoston
12.
DjolakiaU.M.SoltysinskiK.Coveted or Overlooked?: The Psychology of Bidding for Comparable Listings in Digital AuctionsMarketing Letters1232001225–237
13.
FischoffB.DebiasingKahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA.Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases1982Cambridge University PressCambridge442–444
14.
Häubl, G., & Popkowski-Leszczyc, P. (2001). The Effects of Minimum Prices on Value Judgments in Auctions (Working Paper). Edmonton: School of Business, University of Alberta.
15.
Häubl, G., & Popkowski-Leszczyc, P. (2004). Bidding Frenzh: How the Speed of Competitor Reaction Influences Product Valuations in Auctions (Working Paper). Edmonton: School of Business, University of Alberta.
16.
Hossain, T. (2003). Learning by Bidding (Working Paper). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
17.
HuberJ.PayneJ.W.PutoC.Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity HypothesisJournal of Consumer Research9198290–98
18.
KahnemanD.KnetschJ.L.ThalerR.H.Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase TheoremJournal of Political Economy98619901325–1348
19.
KahnemanD.TverskyA.Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under RiskEconometrica4721979263–291
20.
KaplanA.MiddletonJ.Achievement Goals and Goal StructuresMidgleyC.Goals, Goal Structures, and Patterns of Adaptive Learning2002Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, NJ21–53
21.
LevinI.P.GaethG.J.How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the ProductJournal of Consumer Research151988374–378
22.
LoewensteinG.Out of Control: Visceral Influences on BehaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance651996272–292
23.
Lucking-Reiley, D., & Reeves, D. (1999). Pennies From eBay: The Determinants of Price in Online Auctions (Working Paper). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
24.
NowlisS.M.SimonsonI.Attribute-Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference ReversalsJournal of Marketing Research341997205–218May
25.
Ockenfels, A., & Roth, A.E. (forthcoming). Late and Multiple Bidding in Second Price Internet Auctions: Theory and Evidence Concerning Different Rules for Ending an Auction. Games and Economic Behavior.
26.
PierceJ.L.KostovaT.The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of ResearchReview of General Psychology71200284–107
27.
Rasmusen, E. (2003). Strategic Implications of Uncertainty Over One's Own Private Value in Auctions (Working Paper). Bloomington: Indiana University.
RoschE.Cognitive Representation of Semantic CategoriesJournal of Experimental Psychology: General10431975192–230
30.
RothA.E.OckenfelsA.Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence From eBay and Amazon Auctions on the InternetThe American Economic Review92420021093–2004
31.
ShafirE.SimonsonI.Reason-Based ChoiceKahnemanD.TverskyA.Choices, Values, and Frames2000Cambridge University PressCambridge597–619
32.
SimonsonI.TverskyA.Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness AversionJournal of Marketing Research291992281–295August
33.
StawB.Knee-Deep in Big Muddy: A Study of Escalation of Commitment to a Chosen Course of ActionOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance161976172–186
34.
StrahilevitzM.A.LoewensteinG.The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of ObjectsJournal of Consumer Research251998276–289
35.
ThalerR.H.Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer ChoiceJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization1198039–60March
36.
TverskyA.KahnemanD.Rational Choice and the Framing of DecisionsJournal of Business591986251–278
37.
TverskyA.KahnemanD.Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent ModelQuarterly Journal of Economics10619911039–1062November
38.
TverskyA.SattathS.SlovicP.Contingent Weighting in Judgment and ChoicePsychological Review951988371–384
39.
VickreyW.Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed TendersJournal of Finance16119618–37
