In a setting of globalized financial capitalism an issue which has received little attention to date is not whether national models of corporate governance are converging or diverging but rather the channels by which market and regulatory forces interact to promote such convergence or divergence. I herein propose the institutional investor/interlocked directorate pipeline as one such channel of potential convergence. In theory, institutional investors impart tacit knowledge to a select group of corporations by means of engagement activities; such knowledge and influence can subsequently be distributed to a wider corporate population by means of interlocked directorates originating from the engaged corporations. An analysis of the distribution of these pipelines across Canada demonstrates that such pipelines can penetrate geopolitical and industrial boundaries and interact with regulatory forces in shaping models of corporate governance. The wide distribution of such pipelines effectively transforms tacit knowledge originally conveyed by institutional investors to a geographically limited sample of corporations into explicit knowledge accessible across the country.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AggarwalRErelIStulzRWilliamsonR, 2009, “Differences in governance practices between U.S. and foreign firms: Measurement, causes, and consequences”The Review of Financial Studies223131–3169
2.
BatheltH, 2007, “Buzz-and-pipeline dynamics: Towards a knowledge-based multiplier model of clusters”Geography Compass11282–1298
3.
BatheltHMalmbergAMaskellP, 2004, “Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation”Progress in Human Geography2831–56
4.
BauerRBraunRClarkGL, 2008, “The emerging market for European corporate governance: The relationship between governance and capital expenditures, 1997–2005”Journal of Economic Geography8441–469
5.
BaysingerBDButlerHN, 1985, “Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization1101–124
6.
BebchukLRoeM, 1999, “A theory of path dependence in corporate governance and ownership”Stanford Law Review52127–170
7.
BhagatSBoltonBRomanoR, 2008, “The promise and peril of corporate governance indices”, Columbia Law Review1081803–1882
8.
CallonM, 1998The Laws of the Markets (Blackwell, Oxford)
CarpenterMWestphalJ, 2001, “The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making”Academy of Management Journal44639–660
11.
CarrollWKFennemaM, 2002, “Is there a transnational business community?”International Sociology17393–419
12.
ClarkGL, 2000Pension Fund Capitalism (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
13.
ClarkGLHebbT, 2005, “Why should they care? The role of institutional investors in the market for corporate global responsibility”Environment and Planning A372015–2031
14.
ClarkGLWójcikD, 2007The Geography of Finance (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
15.
DoidgeCKarolyiGAStulzRM, 2007, “Why do countries matter so much for corporate governance?”Journal of Financial Economics861–39
16.
DruckerP, 1993Post-capitalist Society (Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford)
17.
FamaEFJensenMC, 1983, “Separation of ownership and control”The Journal of Law and Economics26301–325
18.
FerreiraMAMatosP, 2008, “The colors of investors' money: The role of institutional investors around the world”Journal of Financial Economics88499–533
19.
GertlerMS, 2003, “Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there)”Journal of Economic Geography375–99
20.
GertlerMSLevitteYM, 2005, “Local nodes in global networks: The geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation”Industry and Innovation12487–507
21.
GillanSLStarksLT, 2003, “Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors: A global perspective”Journal of Applied Finance134–22
22.
GilsonRJ, 2001, “Globalizing corporate governance: Convergence of form or function”The American Journal of Comparative Law49329–357
23.
GrayTR, 2010, “A corporate geography of Canada: Insights into a multi-jurisdictional model of corporate governance”, Growth and Change41467–494
24.
GrayTR, 2011, “Mapping a corporate governance exchange: A survey of Canadian shareholder resolutions 2000–2009”Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment130–43
25.
GreenMB, 1983, “The interurban corporate interlocking directorate network of Canada and the United States: A spatial perspective”Urban Geography4338–354
26.
GreenMBSempleR, 1981, “The corporate interlocking directorate as an urban spatial information network”Urban Geography2148–160
27.
HansmannHKraakmanR, 2001, “The end of history for corporate law”Georgetown Law Journal89439–468
28.
HaunschildPRBeckmanCM, 1998, “When do interlocks matter? Alternative sources of information and interlock influence”Administrative Science Quarterly43815–844
29.
HawleyJWilliamsA, 2000The Rise of Fiduciary Capitalism: How Institutional Investors Can Make Corporate America More Democratic (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA)
30.
HawleyJWilliamsA, 2005, “Shifting ground: Emerging global corporate-governance standards and the rise of fiduciary capitalism”Environment and Planning A371995–2013
31.
HebbT, 2008No Small Change: Pension Funds and Corporate Engagement (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
32.
HebbTWójcikD, 2005, “The institutional investment value chain: The CalPERS emerging markets strategy”Environment and Planning A371955–1974
HermalinBEWeisbachMS, 2003, “Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature”FRBNY Economic Policy Review97–26
35.
InnisHA, 1956Essays in Canadian Economic History (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON)
36.
JacobySM, 2007, “Convergence by design: The case of CalPERS in Japan”American Journal of Comparative Law55239–294
37.
KentorJYongSJ, 2004, “Yes, there is a (growing) transnational business community: A study of global interlocking directorates 1983–1998”International Sociology19355–368
38.
KhannaTKoganJPalepuK, 2006, “Globalization and similarities in corporate governance: A cross-country analysis”Review of Economics and Statistics8869–90
39.
La PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferAVishnyR, 1997, “Legal determinants of external finance”Journal of Finance521131–1150
40.
La PortaRLopez-De-SilanesFShleiferAVishnyR, 1998, “Law and finance”Journal of Political Economy1061113–1155
41.
La PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferA, 1999, “Corporate ownership around the world”Journal of Finance54471–518
42.
La PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferA, 2008, “The economic consequences of legal origins”Journal of Economic Literature46285–332
LoAW2005, “Reconciling efficient markets with behavioural finance: The adaptive markets hypothesis”Journal of Investment Consulting721–44
45.
MaceML, 1971Directors: Myth and Reality (Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA)
46.
MertonRCBodieZ, 2005, “The design of financial systems: Towards a synthesis of function and structure”Journal of Investment Management36–28
47.
MintzBSchwartzM, 1985The Power Structure of American Business (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
48.
NonakaITakeuchiT, 1995The Knowledge-creating Company (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
49.
NorthDC, 1994, “Economic performance through time”The American Economic Review84359–368
50.
NunnN, 2009, “The importance of history for economic development”Annual Review of Economics165–92
51.
O'HaganSBGreenMB, 2002a, “Interlocking directorates: An example of tacit knowledge transfer”Urban Geography23154–179
52.
O'HaganSBGreenMB, 2002b, “Tacit knowledge transfer via interlocking directorates: A comparison of Canada and the United States”Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography8449–63
53.
O'HaganSBGreenMB, 2004, “Corporate knowledge transfer via interlocking directorates: A network analysis approach”Geoforum35127–139
54.
Owen-SmithJPowellWW, 2004, “Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community”Organization Science152–21
55.
PerratonJGoldblattDHeldDMcGrewA, 1997, “The globalization of economic activity”New Political Economy2257–277
56.
PfefferJSalancikGR, 1978The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper and Row, New York)
57.
RendersAGaeremynckASercuP, 2010, “Corporate-governance ratings and company performance: A cross-European study”Corporate Governance: An International Review1887–106
58.
RyanLVSchneiderM, 2002, “The antecedents of institutional investor activism”Academy of Management Review27554–573
SalacuseJW, 2003, “Corporate governance, culture and convergence: Corporations American style or with a European touch?”Law and Business Review of the Americas933–62
61.
SempleRKGreenMB1983, “Interurban corporate headquarters relocation in Canada”Cahiers de Géographie du Québec27389–406
62.
SonquistJKoenigT, 1975, “Interlocking directorships in the top US corporations: A graph theory”Insurgent Sociologist5196–230
63.
StorperMSVenablesAJ, 2004, “Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy”Journal of Economic Geography4351–370
64.
StulzR, 2005, “The limits of financial globalization”The Journal of Finance601595–1637
65.
TaylorM, 1999, “The small firm as temporary coalition”Entrepreneurship and Regional Development111–19
TaylorMThriftN, 1982The Geography of Multinationals: Studies in the Spatial Development and Economic Consequences of Multinational Corporations (Croom Helm, Sydney)
68.
UseemM, 1984The Inner Circle (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
69.
Van LoonRJWhittingtonMS, 1987The Canadian Political System: Environment, Structure and Process4th edition (McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto, ON)
70.
WilliamsonOE, 1983The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York)
71.
WójcikD, 2006, “Convergence in corporate governance: Evidence from Europe and the challenge for economic geography”Journal of Economic Geography6639–660
