Face-to-face social activities, such as joint activities with friends or visiting relatives, involve meeting with other persons at a certain time and location. This (social) spatial-choice behavior is critical for successful urban planning. Recently there has been a rapid emergence of research into social interactions in the field of urban planning and transport. This study contributes to our understanding of the relationships between face-to-face social interaction, location-type choice, and travel by presenting analyses based on social-contact diary data gathered for this study in a large-scale survey conducted in the Netherlands. The analysis framework consists of a set of linked linear regression and discrete choice models to predict the location-type choice for a given face-to-face social interaction, the distance to that location, and the transport mode. Furthermore, the model predicts outcomes of a chain of higher-level decisions including the number of face-to-face interactions and the purpose of the interaction. As independent variables, the model system includes sociodemographic and spatial variables. The results indicate that, to a moderate extent the number of face-to-face social interactions, the purpose of the interactions, and the travel distance can be explained by people's personal and residential variables. These variables have a strong impact on the type of location for the interaction and the transport mode used to get there.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArentzeTTimmermansH, 2008, “Social networks, social interactions, and activity-travel behavior: a framework for microsimulation”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design351012–1027
2.
AxhausenK, 2002, “A dynamic understanding of travel demand: a sketch”Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanungnumber 119, Institut für Verkehrsplanung, Transporttechnik, Strassen und Eisenbahnbau, ETH Zürich, http://e-collection.ethbib.ethz.ch/eserv/eth:25303/eth-25303-01.pdf
3.
AxhausenK, 2007, “Activity spaces, biographies, social networks and their welfare gains and externalities: some hypotheses and empirical results”Mobilities215–36
4.
AxhausenK, 2008, “Social networks, mobility biographies, and travel: survey challenges”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35981–996
5.
BanisterDBowlingA, 2004, “Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension”Transport Policy11105–115
6.
BaumannUThieleCLaireiterAKrebsA, 1996, “Computer-assisted interaction diary on social networks, social support, and interpersonal strain”, in Ambulatory Assessment: Computer-assisted Psychological and Psychophysiological Methods in Monitoring and Field Studies Eds FahrenbergJMyrtekM (Hogrefe and Huber, Seattle, WA) pp 69–83
7.
BaymNZhangYLinM, 2004, “Social interaction across media: interpersonal communication on the internet, face-to-face, and telephone”New Media and Society641–60
8.
CarrascoJMillerE, 2006, “Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social networks approach”Transport33463–480
9.
CarrascoJMillerEWellmanB, 2006, “Spatial and social networks: the case of travel for social activities”, paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research Kyoto; copy available from j.currasco@udec.cl
10.
CarrascoJHoganBWellmanBMillerE, 2008, “Collecting social network data to study social activity-travel behavior: an egocentric approach”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35961–980
11.
ChapinF, 1974Human Activity Patterns in the City: Things People do in Time and Space (John Wiley, New York)
12.
DuckS, 1991, “Diaries and logs”, in Studying Interpersonal Interaction Eds MontgomeryBDuckS (Guilford, New York) pp 141–161
13.
DugundjiEGulyásL, 2008, “Sociodynamic discrete choice on networks in space: impacts of agent heterogeneity on emergent outcomes”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design351028–1054
14.
DugundjiEWalkerJ, 2005, “Discrete choice with social and spatial network interdependencies: an empirical example using mixed GEV models with field and ‘panel’ effects”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1921, 70–78
15.
FarberSPáezA, 2008, “My car, my friends, and me: a preliminary analysis of automobility and social activity participation”Journal of Transport Geography17216–225
16.
FreiAAxhausenK, 2007, “Size and structure of social network geographies”Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanungnumber 439, Institut für Verkehrsplanung, Transporttechnik, Strassen und Eisenbahnbau, ETH Zürich, http://e-collection
17.
FuY, 2007, “Contact diaries: building archives of actual and comprehensive personal networks”Field Methods19194–217
18.
GadetJ, 1999Publieke ruimte, parochiale plekken en passantenopenbaarheid: Jonge alleenwonende Amsterdammers over stedelijkheid (DRO, Amsterdam)
19.
GalleMvan DamFPeetersPPolsLRitsema van EckJSegerenAVerwestF, 2004Duizend dingen op een dag: Een tijdsbeeld uitgedrukt in ruimte (NAi Uitgevers, Rotterdam)
20.
HägerstrandT, 1970, “What about people in regional science?”Papers of the Regional Science Association24(7) 7–21
21.
HarveyA STaylorM E, 2000, “Activity settings and travel behaviour: A social contact perspective”2753–73
22.
HortonFReynoldsD, 1971, “Action space formation: a behavioral approach to predicting urban travel behavior”Highway Research Recordnumber 322, 136–148
23.
JakleJBrunnSRosemanC, 1976Human Spatial Behavior (Duxbury Press, North Scituate, MA)
24.
KempermanAArentzeTTimmermansH, 2006, “Social commitments and activity-travel scheduling decisions”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1977, 242–249
25.
LonkilaM, 1999Social Networks in Post-Soviet Russia: Continuity and Change in the Everyday Life of St. Petersburg Teachers (Kikimora Publications, Helsinki)
26.
LuXPasE, 1999, “Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior”Transportation Research, Part A331–18
27.
McPhersonMSmith-LovinLBrashearsM, 2006, “Social isolation in America: changes in core discussion networks over two decades”American Sociological Review71353–375
28.
MarchalFNagelK, 2005, “Modeling location choice of secondary activities with a social network of cooperative agents”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1935, 141–146
29.
MolinEArentzeTTimmermansH, 2007, “Social activities and travel demands: a model-based analysis of social-network data”Transportation Research Recordnumber 2082, pp 168–175
30.
OhnmachtT, 2006, “Mapping social networks in time and space”Arbeitsberischte Verkehrs- und Raumplanungnumber 341, Institut für Verkehrsplanung, Transporttechnik, Strassen und Eisenbahnbau, EHT Zürich, http://e-collection
31.
OldenburgR, 1999, The Great Good Place (Marlow, New York)
32.
PáezAScottD, 2007, “Social influence on travel behavior: a simulation example of the decision to telecommute”Environment and Planning A39647–665
33.
PáezAScottDVolzE, 2008, “A discrete-choice approach to modeling social influence on individual decision making”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design351055–1069
34.
PutnamR, 2000Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon and Schuster, New York)
35.
ReisHWheelerL, 1991, “Studying social interaction with the Rochester Interaction Record”, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, volume 24 Ed. ZannaM (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) pp 270–318
36.
SchönfelderSAxhausenK, 2003, “Activity spaces: measures of social exclusion?”Transport Policy10273–286
37.
SchwanenT, 2008, “Managing uncertain arrival times through sociomaterial associations”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35977–1011
38.
SilvisJNiemeierDD'SouzaR, 2006, “Social networks and travel behavior: report from an integrated travel diary”, paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research Kyoto, 16–20 August 2006; http://mac.ucdavis.edu/dsouza/Pubs/IATBRSilvis.pdf
UrryJ, 2002, “Mobility and proximity”Sociology36255–274
41.
UrryJ, 2003, “Social networks, travel and talk”British Journal of Sociology54155–175
42.
van den BergPArentzeTTimmermansH, 2009, “Size and composition of ego-centered social networks and their effect on geograhpical distance and contact frequency”Transport Research Record number21351–9
