On the basis of a sample of 227 elections in seventeen Western European countries over the period 1945–98, we examine to what extent party systems are shaped by fiscal and political decentralization. With the exception of a few special cases, empirical evidence does not support the existence of a robust relationship between the degree of decentralization and the nationalization of party systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlemánEKellamM, 2008, “The nationalisation of electoral change in the Americas”Electoral Studies27193–212
2.
AlesinaADevlesschauwerAEasterlyWTurletSWacziargR, 2003, “Fractionalization” Journal of Economic Growth8155–194
3.
ArzeF JMartínez-VázquezJMcNabR, 2005, “Fiscal decentralisation and the functional composition of public expenditures”, WP 05–01 (updated), Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, http://aysps.gsu.edu/isp/files/ispwp0501.pdf
4.
BlaisAAduizaEGallegoA, 2011, “Decentralization and voter turnout”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29297–320
5.
BochslerD, 2009, “Measuring party nationalisation: A new Gini-based indicator that corrects for the number of units”Electoral Studies doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2009.06.003
6.
BrancatiD, 2006, “Decentralization: Fueling the fire or dampening the flames of ethnic conflict and secessionism” International Organization60651–685
7.
BrancatiD, 2008, “The origins and strength of regional parties” British Journal of Political Science38135–159
8.
CaramaniD, 2000Elections in Western Europe since 1815: Electoral Results by Constituencies (Palgrave Macmillan, London)
9.
CaramaniD, 2004The Nationalisation of Politics: The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
10.
ChambersW N, 1966, “Parties and nation-building in America”, in Political Parties and Political Development Eds LaPalombaraJWeinerM (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 79–106
11.
ChhibberPKollmanK, 1998, “Party aggregation and the number of parties in India and the United States”American Political Science Review92329–342
12.
ChhibberPKollmanK, 2004The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
13.
ChhibberPMuraliG, 2006, “Duvergerian dynamics in the Indian states”Party Politics125–34
14.
CoxG W, 1997Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems (Cambridge University Press, New York)
15.
CoxG W, 1999, “Electoral rules and electoral coordination”Annual Review of Political Science2145–161
16.
CoxG WKnollJ S, 2003, “Ethnes, fiscs, and electoral rules: The determinants of party-system inflation”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62317_index.htm
17.
DaalderH, 1966, “Parties, elites, and political developments in Western Europe”, in Political Parties and Political Development Eds LaPalombaraJWeinerM (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 43–77
18.
EbelRYilmazS, 2003, “On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralisation”, in Public Finance in Developing and Transitional Countries Eds Martínez-VázquezJAimJ (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 101–120
19.
EpsteinL D, 1993 [1979] Political Parties in Western Democracies3rd edition (Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ)
20.
GibsonE L, 2004Federalism and Democracy in Latin America (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
21.
GolderM, 2005, “Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2000”Electoral Studies24103–121
22.
GolderM, 2006, “Presidential coattails and legislative fragmentation”American Journal of Political Science5034–48
23.
HarbersI, 2010, “Decentralisation and the development of nationalized party systems in new democracies”Comparative Political Studies (forthcoming)
24.
HoogheLMarksG, 2001Multi-level Governance and European Integration (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD)
25.
HoogheLMarksGSchakelA H, 2008, “Regional authority in 42 democracies, 1950–2006: A measure and five hypotheses”Regional and Federal Studies18111–302
26.
HopkinJ, 2009, “Party matters: Devolution and party politics in Britain and Spain”Party Politics15179–198
27.
HopkinJVan HoutenP, 2009, “Decentralisation and state-wide parties: Introduction”Party Politics15131–145
28.
ImK SPesaranM HShinY, 2003, “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels”Journal of Econometrics11553–74
29.
JonesM PMainwaringS, 2003, “The nationalization of parties and party systems: An empirical measure and an application to the Americas”Party Politics9139–166
30.
KasuyaYMoeniusJ, 2008, “The nationalization of party systems: Conceptual issues and alternative district-focused measures”Electoral Studies27126–135
31.
KimJ-OOhnM-G, 1992, “A theory of minor-party persistence: Election rule, social cleavage, and the number of political parties”Social Forces70575–599
32.
KyriacouARoca-SegalésO, 2011, “Fiscal and political decentralization and government quality”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29204–223
33.
LaaksoMTaageperaR, 1979, “‘Effective’ number of parties: A measure with applications to West Europe”Comparative Political Studies123–27
34.
LaffinM, 2007, “Coalition-formation and centre – periphery relations in a national political party”Party Politics13651–668
35.
LaffinMShawETaylorG, 2007, “The new sub-national politics of the British Labour Party” Party Politics1388–108
36.
LagoIMonteroJ R, 2009, “Coordination between electoral arenas in multi-level countries” European Journal of Political Research48176–203
37.
LagoIMonteroJ R, 2010, “The nationalisation of party systems revisited: A new measure based on parties' entry decisions, electoral results, and district magnitude”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, 1–3 June; copy available from http://www.ups.edu/grcp
38.
LevinALinC-FChuC-S J, 2002, “Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties” Journal of Econometrics1081–24
39.
Martínez-VázquezJTimofeevA, 2009, “A fiscal perspective of state rescaling” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society285–105
40.
Martínez-VázquezJTimofeevA, 2010, “Decentralization measures revisited” Public Finance and Management101–29
41.
MazzoleniM, 2009, “The saliency of regionalization in party systems: A comparative analysis of regional decentralisation in party manifestos” Party Politics15199–218
42.
MoeniusJKasuyaY, 2004, “Measuring party linkage across districts: Some party system inflation indices and their properties” Party Politics10543–564
43.
MorgensternSSwindleS MCastagnolaA, 2009, “Party nationalization and institutions” Journal of Politics711322–1341
44.
NickellS, 1981, “Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects” Econometrica491417–1426
45.
NikolenyiC, 2008, “The impact of institutional design on the nationalisation of post-communist party systems: Party inflation in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia”, paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research's Joint Sessions of Workshops, University of Rennes, http://politicalscience.concordia.ca/people/Nikolenyi.php
46.
NikolenyiC, 2009, “Party inflation in India: Why has a multiparty format prevailed in the national party system”, in Duverger's Law of Plurality Voting: The Logic of Party Competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom and the United States Eds GrofmanBBlaisABowlerS (Springer, New York) pp 97–114
47.
PapkeL EWooldridgeJ M, 1996, “Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates”Journal of Applied Econometrics11619–632
RoddenJ, 2004, “Comparative federalism and decentralisation: On meaning and measurement”Comparative Politics36481–499
50.
Rodriguez-PoseASandallR, 2008, “From identity to the economy: Analysing the evolution of the decentralisation discourse”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2654–72
SabatiniC, 2003, “Decentralization and political parties” Journal of Democracy14138–150
53.
SamuelsD, 2003Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
54.
SchakelA H, 2008, “Validation of the regional authority index”Regional and Federal Studies18143–166
55.
SchneiderA, 2003, “Decentralization: Conceptualization and measurement”Studies in Comparative International Development3832–56
56.
StegarescuD, 2005, “Public sector decentralization: Measurement concepts and recent international trends”Fiscal Studies26310–333
57.
ThorlaksonL, 2006, “Party systems in multi-level contexts”, in Devolution and Electoral Politics Eds HoughDJefferyC (Manchester University Press, Manchester) pp 37–52
58.
ThorlaksonL, 2007, “An institutional explanation of party system congruence: Evidence from six federations”European Journal of Political Research4669–95
59.
ThorlaksonL, 2009, “Patterns of party integration, influence and autonomy in seven federations”Party Politics15137–156
60.
Van BiezenIHopkinJ, 2006, “Party organisation in multi-level contexts”, in Devolution and Electoral Politics Eds HoughDJefferyC (Manchester University Press, Manchester) pp 14–36
