Policy network analysis (PNA) and the advocacy coalition framework (ACF) are relatively recent additions to the toolbox of policy analysis. The author explores the strengths and limitations of each through comparative application. The two frameworks are used to analyse policy change and stability in the UK industrial pollution sector over a period of more than twenty-five years. Innovations derived from policy-oriented learning generated in the 1970s were initially rejected before being implemented fourteen years later. The case study illustrates the limits of both theories. Change was not an open competition between advocates of different core policy beliefs. Nevertheless the ACF analysis of contrasting, broadly defined, beliefs can help explain some events beyond policy networks. Resource interdependencies in the policy network provide a good explanation for the stabilities exhibited in the case study. PNA can also explain why some actors were excluded from the policy process whereas others exercised decisionmaking and nondecisionmaking power. In combination, the more fundamental agency-oriented and structure-oriented emphases on beliefs and resources associated with the ACF and PNA, respectively, can enrich policy analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alkali Inspectorate, 1965102nd Annual Report of the Alkali Inspectorate (HMSO, London)
2.
AllottK, 1993IPC—The First Three YearsEnvironmental Data Services, Unit 24, 40 Bowling Green Lane, London EC1R ONE
3.
AshbyEAndersonM, 1981The Politics of Clean Air (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
4.
Boehmer-ChristiansenSSkeaJ, 1991Acid Politics: Environmental and Energy Policies in Britain and Germany (Belhaven Press, London)
5.
BressersHO'TooleJ LJr, 1994, “Networks and water policy: Conclusions and implications for research”Environmental Politics3197–217
Business Deregulation Task Forces, 1994Business Deregulation Task Forces Proposals for ReformDepartment of Trade and Industry, Victoria Street, London SW1H 0ET
8.
CBI, 1986Clean Up—It's Good for BusinessConfederation of British Industry, Centre Point, New Oxford Street, London WC1
9.
CBI, 1993, “Deregulation and the Environment”, submission to the Government's Deregulation Unit; copy available from Confederation of British Industry, Centre Point, New Oxford Street, London WC1
10.
ColemanT, 1992, “Integrated pollution control: Too much to bear or too much to bare?”, keynote address to BICS Conference, 9 December; copy available from Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD
11.
DaugbjergC, 1997, “Policy networks and agricultural policy reforms: Explaining deregulation in Sweden and re-regulation in the European Community”Governance10123–141
12.
DoE, 1982Pollution Paper No.18—Air Pollution Control: The Government Response to the Fifth Report of the Royal Commission on Environment PollutionDepartment of the Environment (HMSO, London)
13.
DoE, 1986aEfficiency Scrutiny Report. Inspecting Industry: Pollution and SafetyDepartment of the Environment (HMSO, London)
14.
DoE, 1986bAir Pollution Control in Great Britain: A Review and ProposalsDepartment of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU
15.
DoE, 1988, “Integrated Pollution Control”, consultation paper, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU
16.
DoE, 1993Integrated Pollution Control: A Practical GuideDepartment of the Environment (HMSO, London)
17.
DowdingK, 1994, “Policy networks: Don't stretch a good idea too far”, in Contemporary Political Studies 1994 Eds DunleavyPStanyerJ, (Political Studies Association, Belfast) pp 50–78
18.
DowdingK, 1995, “Model or metaphor? A critical review of the policy network approach”Political Studies43136–158
19.
DTI, 1994Deregulation: Cutting Red TapeDepartment of Trade and Industry, Victoria Street, London SW1H 0ET
20.
ENDS, Environmental Data Services Ltd, Unit 24, 40 Bowling Green Land, London EC1R 0NE
21.
ENDS, Environmental Data Services Ltd1986a, “New fears for air pollution inspectorate”ENDS Report141
22.
ENDS, Environmental Data Services Ltd1986b, “Opening shots in Whitehall battle over new pollution control agency”ENDS Report129
23.
ENDS, Environmental Data Services Ltd1993a, “Drawing the battle lines in the deregulation debate”ENDS Report217
24.
ENDS, Environmental Data Services Ltd1993b, “Organic chemicals industry wins time for IPC revisions”ENDS Report220
25.
Environment Agency, 1997Operator and Pollution Risk AppraisalEnvironment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Axtec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD
26.
FinemanS, 1997, “Contests for sustainability: When regulator meets regulated”, presented at the conference on Responses to the Environmental Challenge in Organisation Studies, Budapest, July; copy available from the author, Bath School of Management, University of Bath, Bath
27.
FisherKSchotJ, 1993Environmental Strategies for Industry (Island Press, Washington, DC)
28.
FrankelM, 1974The Alkali Inspectorate: The Control of Industrial Air Pollution (Social Audit, London)
HanfKO'TooleL JJr, 1992, “Revisiting old friends: Networks, implementation structures and the management of interorganisational relations”European Journal of Political Research21163–181
31.
HannA, 1995, “Sharpening up Sabatier: Belief systems and public policy”Politics1519–26
32.
HillM, 1982, “The role of the British Alkali and Clean Air Inspectorate in air pollution control”Policy Studies Journal11165–174
HMIP, 19951994–95 Annual ReportHer Majesty's Inspectorate of Pollution (HMSO, London)
36.
House of Commons Environment Committee, 1997Third Report Session 1996/97 – The Environmental Impact of Cement Manufacture House of Commons Papers Session 1996–97 124 (The Stationery Office, London)
37.
HSE, 1984Health and Safety: Industrial Air PollutionHealth and Safety Executive (HMSO, London)
38.
IrelandF, 1967104th Annual Report of the Alkali Inspectorate (HMSO, London)
39.
Jenkins-SmithH CSabatierP A, 1993a, “The dynamics of policy-oriented learning”, in Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach Eds SabatierP AJenkins-SmithH C, (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 41–56
40.
Jenkins-SmithH CSabatierP A, 1993b, “The study of public policy processes”, in Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach Eds SabatierP AJenkins-SmithH C, (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 1–12
41.
JohnP, 1998Analysing Public Policy (Frances Pinter, London)
42.
JordanA, 1993, “IPC and the evolving style and structure of environmental regulation in the UK”Environmental Politics2405–427
43.
JordanAGreenawayJ, 1998, “Shifting agendas, changing regulatory structures and the ‘new’ politics of environmental pollution: British coastal water policy, 1955–1995”Public Administration76669–694
44.
KenisPSchneiderV, 1991, “Policy networks and policy analysis: Scrutinising a new analytical toolbox”, in Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Consideration Eds MarinBMayntzR, (Campus, Frankfurt) pp 25–59
45.
McCormickJ, 1991British Politics and the Environment (Earthscan, London)
46.
MarshD, 1998, “The utility and future of policy network analysis”, in Comparing Policy Networks Ed. MarshD, (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks) pp 185–197
47.
MarshDRhodesRAW, 1992, “Policy communities and issue networks: Beyond topology”, in Policy Networks in British Governments Eds MarshDRhodesRAW, (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 249–269
48.
MarshDSmithM, 1996, “Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach”, undated mimeo presented at the University of Birmingham; copy available from authors, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham
49.
MetcalfeLRichardsS, 1987Improving Public Management (Sage, London)
National Audit Office, 1991Control and Monitoring of Pollution: Review of the Pollution Inspectorate (HMSO, London)
52.
O'RiordanTWealeA, 1989, “Administrative reorganisation and policy change: The case of Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Pollution”Public Administration67277–294
53.
O'TooleL JJr, 1997, “Networking requirements, institutional capacity, and implementation gaps in transitional regimes: The case of acidification policy in Hungary”Journal of European Public Policy41–17
54.
OwensS, 1989, “The unified inspectorate and best practicable environmental option in the United Kingdom”, in Integrated Pollution Control in Europe and North America Eds HaighNIrwinF, (The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC) pp 169–208
55.
PattenC, 1990Hansard House of Commons Debates165 col 35, 15 January
56.
RCEP, 1976Fifth Report. Air Pollution Control: An Integrated ApproachRoyal Commission on Environmental Pollution (HMSO, London)
57.
ReadM, 1989The Politics of Tobacco unpublished DPhil thesis, Department of Government, University of Essex
58.
RhodesR A W, 1986The National World of Local Government (Allen and Unwin, London)
59.
SabatierP A, 1993, “Policy change over a decade or more”, in Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach Eds SabatierP AJenkins-SmithH C, (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 13–40
60.
SabatierP A, 1998, “The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe”Journal of European Public Policy598–130
61.
SabatierP AJenkins-SmithH C, 1993, “The advocacy coalition framework: Assessment, revisions and implications for scholars and practitioners”, in Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach Eds SabatierP AJenkins-SmithH C, (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 211–236
62.
SabatierP APelkeyN, 1987, “Incorporating multiple actors and guidance instruments into models of regulatory policymaking: An advocacy coalition framework”Administration and Society19236–263
63.
SchlagerEBlomquistW, 1995, “A comparison of three emerging theories of the policy process”Political Research Quarterly49651–672
64.
SimonH, 1985, “Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science”American Political Science Review79293–304
65.
SkeaJSmithA, 1998, “Integrating pollution control”, in British Environmental Policy in Europe Eds LowePWardS, (Routledge, London) pp 265–282
66.
SmithA, 1996, “Voluntary schemes and the need for statutory regulation: The case of Integrated Pollution Control”Business Strategy and the Environment581–87
67.
SmithA, 1997Integrated Pollution Control (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
68.
SmithM J, 1993Pressure, Power and Policy (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
