The author examines some of the issues and controversies that arise when facilities with noxious environmental, social, or economic qualities (LULUs, or locally unwanted land uses) locate in communities. A taxonomy of LULUs, based on economic growth features, is developed and the effects of five specific kinds of LULUs: interstate highways; large dams; medium-security and maximum-security prisons; commercial nuclear power plants; and gambling casinos, are described. The author uses quasi-experimental control-group methods to assess the economic impacts of these facilities on US counties during the period 1972–94. It is shown that few real negative effects can in fact be attributed to LULUs. However, only interstate highways measurably stimulate aggregate employment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ACA, 1990Directory: Juvenile and Adult Correctional Departments, Institutions, Agencies and Paroling AuthoritiesAmerican Correctional Association, 4380 Forbes Boulevard, Lanham, MD 20706
2.
BEA, 1986Regional Economic Information SystemUS Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington, DC
3.
BEA, 1996Regional Economic Information SystemUS Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington, DC
4.
Beale C L, 1993, “Prisons, population, and jobs in nonmetro America”Rural Development Perspectives816–19
5.
BjornstadD JVogtD P, 1984, “Some comments relating to model specification on ‘Effects of nuclear power plants on residential property values’”Journal of Regional Science24135–136
6.
BoC, 1979County and City Data Book Consolidated File, County and City Data, 1947–1977Data User Services Division, US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC
7.
BoC, 1980Census of Population and Housing, 1980: Master Area Reference File (MARF) 2Data User Services Division, US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC
8.
BriggsR, 1980The Impact of Interstate Highway System on Non-metropolitan Growth (US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC)
9.
CarlsonK A, 1992, “Doing good and looking bad: A case study of prison/community relations”Crime and Delinquency3856–69
10.
Casino Vacations Inc., 1994Casino Resort and Riverboat Fun Book GuideCasino Vacations Inc., PO Box 703, Dania, FL 33004
11.
CoxP TGroverWSiskinB, 1971, “Effect of water resource investment on economic growth”Water Resource Journal832–39
12.
DoA QWilburR WShortJ L, 1994, “An empirical examination of the externalities of neighborhood churches on housing values”Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics8127–136
13.
EadingtonW R, 1995, “Economic development and the introduction of casinos: Myths and realities”Economic Development Review1351–54
14.
FEMA, 1990National Inventory of Dams DataFederal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472
15.
FHWA, 1990PR-511 Master FileData Systems Division, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
16.
FitchenJ M, 1991Endangered Spaces, Enduring Places: Change, Identity, and Survival in Rural America (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
17.
FriedmanJHakimSWeinblattJ, 1989, “Casino gambling as a ‘growth pole’ strategy and its effect on crime”Journal of Regional Science29615–623
18.
GambleH BDowningR H, 1982, “Effects of nuclear power plants on residential property values”Journal of Regional Science22457–478
19.
GjesdahlDDrakeWJr, 1979, “Impact of dam and lake construction on rural economics”, RR 79-R4, US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, VA
20.
GoodmanR, 1994, “Legalized gambling as a strategy for economic development”, Center for Economic Development, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
21.
GreenbergM RKrueckebergD AKaltmanMMetzWWilhelmC, 1986, “Local planning v national policy: Urban growth near nuclear power stations in the United States”Town Planning Review57225–237
22.
HumphreyC RSellR R, 1975, “The impact of controlled access highways on population growth in Pennsylvania nonmetropolitan communities, 1940–1970”Rural Sociology40332–343
23.
IssermanA MBeaumontP M, 1989, “New directions in quasi-experimental control group methods for project evaluation”Socio-Economic Planning Sciences2339–53
24.
IssermanA MMerrifieldJ D, 1987, “Quasi-experimental control group methods for regional analysis: An application to an energy boomtown and growth pole theory”Economic Geography633–19
25.
KindtJ W, 1994, “Increased crime and legalizing gambling operations: The impact on the socioeconomics of business and government”Criminal Law Bulletin30538–555
26.
LewisP M, 1986, “The economic impact of the operation and closure of a nuclear power Station”Regional Studies20425–432
27.
LichterD TFuguittG V, 1980, “Demographic response to transportation innovation: The case of the interstate highway”Social Forces59492–511
28.
NelsonJ P, 1981, “Three mile island and residential property values: Empirical analysis and policy implicatons”Land Economics57363–372
29.
NRC, 1990, “US commercial nuclear power reactors”, mimeograph, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, One White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852
30.
PopperF, 1985, “The environmentalist and the LULU”Environment277–11, 37–40
31.
RephannT, 1993, “Highways and regional economic development: What can we learn from regional economics theory and models”, RP9322, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WVA
32.
RephannTIssermanA, 1994, “New highways as economic development tools: An evaluation using quasi-experimental matching methods”Regional Science and Urban Economics24723–751
33.
RephannTDaltonMStairAIssermanA, 1997, “Casino gambling as an economic development strategy”Tourism Economics3161–183
34.
RichardsonH, 1973Regional Growth Theory (John Wiley, New York)
35.
SechrestD K, 1992, “Locating prisons: Open versus closed approaches to siting”Crime and Delinquency3888–104
36.
ShichorD, 1992, “Myths and realities in prison siting”Crime and Delinquency3870–87
37.
von BöventerE, 1975, “Regional growth theory”Urban Studies121–29
