Although natural images often include discordant information about object boundaries, the majority of research on texture segmentation has involved variation along a single dimension, eg colour, orientation, size. In this study, we examined orientation-based texture segmentation in the presence and absence of task-irrelevant colour variation. Previously, it had been shown that orientation-based texture segmentation was impaired if the elements, normally of one colour, were randomly allocated one of two colours (Morgan et al, 1992 Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B248 291–295). We found that this interference disappeared, however, when the spatial pattern of the colour variation was regular, as opposed to random, and when the elements were randomly positioned. We consider four models of how relevant and irrelevant texture information might combine to produce the interference effect, with special regard to these new findings. None of the models could account for the dependency of the interference effect on the spatial arrangement of colour and orientation in the texture. We suggest that inter-element separation and spatial-frequency selectivity are critical variables in the interference effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckJ, 1982“Textural segmentation”, in Organization and Representation in Perception Ed. BeckJ (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 285–317
BlakemoreCCampbellFW, 1969“On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images”Journal of Physiology203237–260
4.
CaelliT, 1985“Three processing characteristics of visual texture segmentation”Spatial Vision119–30
5.
CallaghanTC, 1984“Dimensional interaction of hue and brightness in preattentive field segregation”Perception & Psychophysics3625–34
6.
CallaghanTC, 1989“Interference and dominance in texture segregation: Hue geometric form and line orientation”Perception & Psychophysics46299–311
7.
CallaghanTCLasagaMIGarnerWR, 1986“Visual texture segregation based on orientation and hue”Perception & Psychophysics3932–38
8.
DuncanJHumphreysG, 1989“Visual search and stimulus similarity”Psychological Review96433–458
9.
DuncanJHumphreysG, 1992“Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance18578–588
10.
EnnsJ, 1986“Seeing textons in context”Perception & Psychophysics39143–147
11.
FieldDHayesAHessR, 1993“Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local ‘association field’”Vision Research33173–193
12.
GrossbergSMingollaE, 1985“Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries and emergent segmentations”Perception & Psychophysics38141–171
13.
HeitgerFvon der HeydtR, 1993“A computational model of neural contour processing: Figure — ground segregation and illusory contours”Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Vision, Berlin (Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press)
14.
LiALennieP, 1997“Mechanisms underlying segmentation of colored textures”Vision Research3783–97
15.
LiHOKingdomFAA, 1998“Does segregation by colour/luminance facilitate the detection of structure-from-motion in noise?”Perception27769–784
16.
LuschowANothdurftHC, 1988“Does pure colour contrast render pop-out of orientation?”Perception17377
17.
LuschowANothdurftHC, 1993“Pop-out of orientation but no pop-out of motion at isoluminance”Vision Research3391–104
18.
McIlhaggaWHMullenKT, 1996“Contour integration with color and luminance contrast”Vision Research361265–1279
19.
McIlhaggaWHHineTColeGRSnyderAW, 1990“Texture segregation with luminance and chromatic contrast”Vision Research30489–498
20.
MarrD, 1982Vision (San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman)
21.
MollonJD, 1989“‘Tho’ she kneeled in that Place where they grew …. The uses and origins of primate colour vision”Journal of Experimental Biology14621–38
22.
MorganMJ, 1991“Decoding the retinal colour signal”Current Biology1215–217
23.
MorganMJAdamAMollonJD, 1992“Dichromats detect colour-camouflaged objects that are not detected by trichromats”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B248291–295
24.
MullenKTBeaudotWHAMcIlhaggaWH, 2000“Contour integration in color vision: a common process for the blue-yellow, red-green and luminance mechanisms?”Vision Research40639–655
25.
MullenKTKingdomFAA, 1991“Colour contrast in form perception”, in The Perception of Colour Ed. GourasPvolume 6 of Vision and Visual Disfunction Ed. Cronly-DillonJ (London: Macmillan) pp 198–217
26.
NagyALSanchezRR, 1990“Critical color differences determined with a visual search task”Journal of the Optical Society of America A71209–1217
27.
NagyALSanchezRRHughesTC, 1990“Visual search for color differences with foveal and peripheral vision”Journal of the Optical Society of America A71995–2001
28.
NothdurftHC, 1985“Sensitivity for structure gradient in texture discrimination tasks”Vision Research251957–1968
29.
NothdurftHC, 1997“Different approaches to the encoding of visual segmentation”, in Computational and Psychophysical Mechanisms of Visual Coding Eds JenkinsMHarrisL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 20–43
30.
PashlerH, 1988“Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation”Perception & Psychophysics43307–318
31.
SagiDJuleszB, 1987“Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences”Spatial Vision239–49
32.
SwitkesEDe ValoisKK, 1983“Luminance and chromaticity interactions in spatial vision”, in Colour Vision Eds MollonDSharpeLT (London: Academic Press) pp 465–470
33.
TheeuwesJ, 1992“Perceptual selectivity for color and form”Perception & Psychophysics51599–606
34.
TreismanAMGeladeG, 1980“A feature-integration theory of attention”Cognitive Psychology1297–136
35.
TreismanASatoS, 1990“Conjunction search revisited”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16459–478
36.
UllmanS, 1984“Visual routines”Cognition1897–159
37.
WolfeJM, 1992“Effortless texture segmentation and ‘parallel’ visual search are not the same thing”Vision Research32757–763
38.
WolfeJM, 1994“Guided Search 2.0. A revised model of visual search”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review1202–238
39.
WolfeJMCaveKRFranzelSL, 1989“Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15419–433
