Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of the experiments and analyses was to discover whether the “independence” model, which successfully accounts for the perception of synthetic multi-dimensional stimuli, would also describe the perception of speech in noise. Two sets of four words were chosen which could be considered phonetically to be describable in terms of two dimensions. The S/R matrix was analysed as if the stimuli were bi-dimensional elementary stimuli. Satisfactory fits were obtained by the independence model. Two analyses were conducted upon data from Miller and Nicely (1955) and Conrad (1964) to discover whether the perception of phonemes was also predictable on the independence model. In general this was found to be the case.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Broadbent

D. E.

(1967). Word-frequency effect and response bias. Psychol. Rev. 74, 1–15.

Chaney

R. B.

Webster

J. C.

(1965). Information in certain multi-dimensional acoustic signals U.S. Naval Electronics Lab. Rept. No. 1339.

Conrad

(1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. Brit. J. Psychol. 55, 75–84.

Corcoran

D. W. J.

(1966). The prediction of responses to multidimensional stimuli from responses to unidimensional stimuli. J. exp. Psychol. 71, 47–54.

Corcoran

D. W. J.

(1967). Perceptual independence and recognition of two-dimensional auditory stimuli. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 42, 139–42.

Eriksen

E. W.

Hake

H. H.

(1955). Multidimensional stimulus differences and accuracy of discrimination. J. exp. Psychol. 50, 153–60.

Green

D. M.

Swets

J. A.

(1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics London: Wiley.

Kimura

(1961a). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canad. J. Psychol. 15, 166–171.

Kimura

(1961b). Some effects of temporal lobe damage on auditory perception. Canad. J. Psychol. 15, 156–65.

10.

Kimura

(1964). Left-right differences in the perception of melodies. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 16, 355–8.

11.

Liberman

A. M.

(1957). Some results of research on speech perception. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 29, 117–23.

12.

Liberman

A. M.

Cooper

F. S.

Harris

K. S.

MacNeilage

P. F.

(1963). A motor theory of speech perception. Proc. Speech Comm.

13.

Licklider

J. C. R.

Miller

G. A.

(1951). The perception of speech. Handbook of Experimental Psychology Stevens

S. S.

London: Chapman and Hall.

14.

Miller

G. A.

Nicely

P. E.

(1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 27, 338–52.

15.

Milner

(1962). Laterality effects in audition. Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance Mountcastle

V. B.

Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.

16.

Oldfield

R. C.

(1966). Things, words and the brain. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 18, 340–53.

17.

Peterson

G. E.

Shoup

J. E.

(1966). A physiological theory of phonetics. J. Speech Hearing Res. 9, 5–67.

18.

Stevens

K. N.

(1960). Towards a model for speech recognition. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 29, 117–23.

19.

Signal Detection and Recognition by Human Observers Swets

J. A.

London: Wiley 1964.

20.

Thorndike

E. L.

Lorge

(1944). The Teacher's Wordbook of 30,000 Words New York: Columbia University Press.

Perceptual Independence in the Perception of Speech

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References