Master’s programs in Public Administration (MPA) may contribute to a better platform for exchange between the academy and the field of practice. But how should such programs be designed and run to meet the ambition of bringing together study and work experience? This contribution analyzes that question and develops an educational philosophy of de-linking and re-linking. It reports on the educational practice of the MPA program for practitioners at Erasmus University Rotterdam, which is based on this analysis and philosophy. The thesis of the paper is that programs like this one need a specific pedagogical approach. An outline of such an approach is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CummingsT. (2004). Organizational development and change: Foundations and applications. In BoonstraJ. J. (Ed.). Dynamics of organizational change and learning (pp. 25–42). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..
2.
EliotT. S. (1979). Four quarters. London: Faber & Faber.
3.
FreidsonE. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic.Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
4.
JohnsonR. B. (1998). Toward a theoretical model of evaluation utilization. Evaluation and Program Planning21, 93–110.
5.
LindblomC. E.CohenD. K. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
6.
MeerF.B. van derMastikH. (1993). Transference to real-life contexts: Conditions for experiential learning from simulation. In PercivalF.LodgeS.SaundersD. (Eds.). The simulation and gaming yearbook 1993: Developing transferable skills in education and training (pp. 75–83). London: Kogan Page.
7.
MeerF.B. van der (1999). Evaluation and the social construction of impacts. Evaluation, 5(4), 387–406.
PedersenL. H.JensenH. N. (2007, September). Knowledge production on public sector reform in the interface between practice and research. Paper presented at the European Group of Public Administrators conference, Madrid.
10.
ReinMSchönD. A. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
11.
RingelingA. B. (1996). De toepassingsgerichtheid van de bestuurskunde [The practice orientedness of public administration]. In AlbertsG. (Ed.). Beleidswetenschap en praktijk [Policy science and practice](pp.85–104). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen (KUN).
12.
ShulhaL. M.CousinsJ. B. (1997). Evaluation use: Theory, research and practice since 1986. Evaluation Practice, 18(3), 195–208.
13.
WeissC. H. (1980). Knowledge creep and decision accretion. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(3), 381–404.
