Growth in the popularity of social networking sites (SNSs) such as Facebook has been accompanied by unintended negative results (e.g., cyberbullying). SNSs could offer solutions, as well. In this article, we explore the persuasive effects of the emotional appeal and message virality of Facebook status updates. Using status updates for a fictitious anticyberbullying organization, we conducted a 3×2×2×3 (emotional tone×affective evaluation×viral reach×message repetition) mixed factorial experiment (N=365). Positive messages resulted in more positive message evaluations and stronger anticyberbullying attitudes and viral behavioral intentions. Further, low message virality led to the most favorable message evaluations, while high virality resulted in stronger anticyberbullying attitudes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckerP. 2012. Twitter to hit 500 million accounts by february. http://wallblog.co.uk/2012/01/16/twitter-to-hit-500-million-accounts-by-february/. 2012 Jan. 16.
WassermanT. 2012. Facebook to hit 1 billion user mark in August. Mashable.comJan.12http://mashable.com/2012/01/12/facebook-1-billion-users/. 2012 Jan. 12.
4.
Go-Gulf.com2012. Fortune 500: social media statistics. www.go-gulf.com/fortune.jpg. 2012 March 28.
5.
Common Knowledge. 2011. 3rd Annual Nonprofit Social Network Benchmark Report. http://nonprofitsocialnetworksurvey.com/files/2011%20NPO%20SN%20Benchmark%20Report%20Final.pdf. 2012 March 28.
6.
HertzMF, David-FerdonC. 2008. Electronic media and youth violence: a CDC issue brief for educators and caregivers. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control.
7.
LangosC. Cyberbullying: the challenge to define. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2012; 15:285–289.
8.
Consumers Report Magazine. 2011. Online exposure: social networks, mobile phones, and scams can threaten your security. http://consumerreports.org/cro/magazine-archive/2011/june/electronics-computers/state-of-the-net/online-exposure/index.htm. 2012 March 28.
9.
LenhartA, MaddenM, SmithAet al.2011. Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites: how American teens navigate the new world of “digital citizenship”Washington, DC: Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project.
10.
HindujaS, PatchinJW. Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 2010; 14:206–221.
11.
SpearsB, SleeP, OwensLet al.Behind the scenes and screens: insights into the human dimension of covert and cyberbullying. Journal of Psychology, 2009; 217:189–196.
12.
WrightVH, BurnhamJJ, InmanCTet al.Cyberbullying: using virtual scenarios to educate and raise awareness. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 2009; 26:35–42.
13.
AngR, GohDH. Cyberbullying among adolescents: the role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 2010; 41:387–397.
14.
KiriakidisSP, KavouraA. Cyberbullying: a review of the literature on harassment through the Internet and other electronic means. Family and Community Health, 2010; 33:82–93.
15.
LiQ. New bottle but old wine: a research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 2007; 23:1777–1791.
16.
MarkL, RatliffeKT. Cyber worlds: new playgrounds for bullying. Computers in the Schools, 2011; 28:91–116.
17.
EcklerP, RodgersS. Viral advertising: a conceptualization. ChangH. The handbook of international advertising research. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell(in press).
18.
GolanG, ZaidnerL. Creative strategies in viral advertising: an application of Taylor's six-segment message strategy wheel. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2008; 13:959–972.
19.
PorterL, GolanGJ. From subservient chickens to brawny men: a comparison of viral advertising to television advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2006; 6:26–33.
20.
ChiuH-C, HsiehY-C, KaoY-Het al.The determinants of email receivers' disseminating behaviors on the internet. Journal of Advertising Research, 2007; 47:524–534.
21.
PalkaW, KeyP, DietmarW. Mobile word-of-mouth—a grounded theory of mobile viral marketing. Journal of Information Technology, 2009; 24:172–185.
22.
PhelpsJ, LewisR, MobilioLet al.Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. Journal of Advertising Research, 2004; 44:333–348.
23.
GangadharbatlaH, SmithJ. 2007. eWOM: the effect of individual level factors on viral consumers' email pass along behavior. SheehanKM. Proceedings of the 2007 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising. Burlington, VT, American Academy of Advertising, 207.
24.
BardzellJ, BardzellS, PageT. Emotion, engagement, and internet video. Charlestown, MA: OTOinsights.
25.
BrownMR, BhaduryRK, PopeNKL. The impact of comedic violence on viral advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 2010; 39:49–66.
26.
ChiuH-C, LeeM, ChenJ-R. Viral marketing: a study of e-mail spreading behavior across gender. Journal of Website Promotion, 2008; 2:17–30.
27.
De PelsmackerP, NeijensPC. New advertising formats: how persuasion knowledge affects consumer responses. Journal of Marketing Communication, 2012; 18:1–4.
28.
EcklerP, BollsPD. Spreading the virus: emotional tone of viral advertising and its effect on forwarding intentions and attitudes. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2011; 11:1–11.
29.
SmithT, CoyleJR, LightfootEet al.Reconsidering models of influence: the relationship between consumer social networks and word-of-mouth effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 2007; 47:387–397.
30.
SunT, YounS, WuHet al.Online word-of-mouth (or mouse): an exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 2006; 11:1104–1127.
31.
DrèzeX, ZufrydenF. Is internet advertising ready for prime time?Journal of Advertising Research, 1998; 38:7–18.
32.
HongJ, LeckenbyJD. Audience measurement and media reach/frequency issues in Internet advertising. WilcoxG. Proceedings of the 1996 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising. Vancouver, BC, American Academy of Advertising.
33.
RayburnJD. 1996. Uses and gratification. SalwenMB, StacksDW. An integrated approach to communication and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 97–119.
34.
RuggieroTE. Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 2000; 3:3–37.
35.
BollsPD. Understanding emotion from a superordinate dimensional perspective: a productive way forward for communication processes and effects studies. Communication Monographs, 2010; 77:146–152.
36.
MaioGR, HaddockG. 2007. Attitude change. KruglanskiAW, HigginsET. Social psychology: handbook of basic principles. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 565–586.
37.
NabiRL. The case for emphasizing discrete emotions in communication research. Communication Monographs, 2010; 77:153–159.
38.
ChaikenS. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980; 39:752–756.
39.
ChaikenS, TroppeY. 1999. Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
40.
PettyRE, CacioppoJT. 1986. Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
41.
AakerDA, NorrisD. Characteristics of TV commercials perceived as informative. Journal of Advertising Research, 1982; 22:61–70.
42.
AakerDA, StaymanDM, HagertyMR. Warmth in advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 1986; 12:365–381.
43.
ChoiYK, ThorsonE. 1983. Memory for factual, emotional, and balanced ads under two instructional sets. FletcherAD. Proceedings of the 1983 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising. Knoxville, TN, University of Tennessee.
44.
PageTJ, ThorsonE, HeideMP. 1990. The memory impact of commercials varying in emotional appeal and product involvement. AgresSJ, EdellJA, DubitskyTM. Emotion in advertising. New York: Quorum Books, 255–268.
45.
LangA. The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 2000; 50:46–70.
46.
LangA. Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 2006; 56:S57–S80.
47.
LangA, PotterRF, BollsP. 2009. Where psychophysiology meets the media: taking the effects out of mass communication research. BryantJ, OliverMB. Media effects: advances in theory and research. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 185–206.
48.
PotterRF, BollsPD. 2011. Psychophysiological measurement and meaning. New York: Routledge.
49.
CacioppoJT, GardnerWL, BerntsonGG. Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: the case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1997; 1:3–25.
50.
CacioppoJT, GardnerWL, BerntsonGG. The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999; 76:839–855.
51.
KrebsJR, DawkinsR. 1984. Animal signals: mind reading and manipulation. KrebsJR, DaviesNB. Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach, 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
52.
AndersonK, DixonPW, KarrLMet al.Reaction times to words vs symbols for both hands. Perceptual Motor Skills, 2004; 99:754–756.
53.
CacioppoJT, BerntsonGG. Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: a critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 1994; 115:401–423.
54.
GobetF, LanePCR, CrokerSet al.Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2001; 5:236–243.
55.
ChoiYK, MiracleGE, BioccaF. The effects of anthropomorphic agents on advertising effectiveness and the mediating role of presence. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2001; 2:19–32.
56.
MuehlingDD. An investigation of factors underlying attitudes toward advertising-in-general. Journal of Advertising, 2007; 16:32–40.
57.
CoulterK, PunjG. Understanding the role of idiosyncratic thinking in brand attitude formation. Journal of Advertising, 2007; 36:7–20.
58.
NanX, HeoK. Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility initiatives: examining the role of brand/cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising, 2007; 36:63–74.
59.
EllisonNB, SteinfieldC, LampeC. The benefits of Facebook “friends”: social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007; 12:1143–1168.
60.
FisheinM, AjzenI. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
