Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A recent study has suggested that observers' visual explorations of the external world can proceed unimpaired when the visual environment precludes the operation of memory processes (as, for instance, when the display elements change locations every 100 ms). One theoretical limitation of this study was that distractors were the only elements that had the potential to be tagged during visual search. The present study sought to clarify the amnesic-search hypothesis by investigating whether memory processes can guide search in other contexts in which targets also have the potential to be tagged. Accordingly, the experimental conditions of the previous study were repeated using a different search task in which observers had to decide whether one target or two were present among a variable number of similar distractors. Under these search conditions, the present findings provided strong evidence that memory processes can guide visual search.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ballard

D.H.

Hayhoe

M.M.

Pelz

J.B.

(1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 66–80.

Cave

K.R.

Wolfe

J.M.

(1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225–271.

Chun

M.M.

Jiang

(1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71.

Dehaene

Cohen

(1994). Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: Neuropsychological evidence from simultanagnosia patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 958–975.

Desimone

Duncan

(1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.

Horowitz

T.S.

Wolfe

J.M.

(1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575–577.

Klein

(1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430–431.

Klein

R.M.

MacInnes

W.J.

(1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346–352.

Klein

R.M.

Taylor

(1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to inhibition. In Dagenbach

Carr

T.H.

(Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113–150). San Diego: Academic Press.

10.

Macmillan

N.A.

Creelman

C.D.

(1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Maljkovic

Nakayama

(1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657–672.

12.

Maljkovic

Nakayama

(1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 977–991.

13.

Neibur

Koch

(1996). Control of selective attention: Modeling the where pathway. In Touretzky

D.S.

Mozer

M.C.

Hasselmo

M.E.

(Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 8, pp. 802–808). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

14.

Posner

M.I.

Cohen

(1984). Components of attention. In Bouma

Bowhuis

(Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

15.

Takeda

Yagi

(1998). Re-examination of an inhibitory tagging system. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Advances in Research on Visual Cognition: Selection and Integration (pp. 211–216). Tsukuba, Japan: Science & Technology Association.

16.

Theeuwes

Kramer

A.F.

Atchley

(1998). Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 130–134.

17.

Wang

Cavanagh

Green

(1994). Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 495–500.

18.

Ward

McClelland

J.L.

(1989). Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 664–672.

19.

Watson

Humphreys

G.W.

(1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90–122.

20.

Wolfe

J.M.

(1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238.

21.

Wolfe

J.M.

Pokorny

C.W.

(1990). Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 357–362.

Searching for One Versus Two Identical Targets: When Visual Search Has a Memory

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References