To improve the understanding of environmental concern, considering the context within which individuals develop environmental concerns may be important. One salient contextual variable related to local environmental issues is place attachment, which deals with human bonding to a specific physical environment. In a study in a rural community in Norway, the local attitudes toward a proposal of a major hydropower development, which will cause major environmental impacts, were examined in relation to sociodemographic variables and place attachment. The results from a postal survey show that place attachment explained more of the variances in attitudes than the sociodemographic variables all together.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altman, I. , & Low, S. M. (Eds.). (1992). Place attachment. Human behavior and environment12. New York: Plenum.
2.
Bonnes, M. , & Secchiaroli, G. (1995). Environmental psychology. A psycho-social introduction. London: Sage.
3.
Brown, B. B. , & Perkins, P. B. (1992). Disruption in place attachment. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment. Human behavior and environment 12 (pp. 278-304). New York: Plenum.
4.
Davidson, D. J. , & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns. A review and analysis of available research. Environment & Behavior, 3, 302-339.
5.
Dietz, T. , Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment & Behavior, 4, 450-471.
6.
Graham, S. , & Healey, P. (1999). Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies, 7(5), 623-646.
7.
Kaltenborn, B. P. (in press). Effects of sense of place on responses to environmental impact: A study among residents in Svalbard in the Norwegian High Arctic. Applied Geography.
8.
Low, S. M. , & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment—a conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment. Human behavior and environment 12 (pp. 1-12). New York: Plenum.
9.
Moore, R. L. , & Graefe, A. G. (1994). Attachment to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users. Leisure Sciences, 1, 17-31.
10.
Proshansky, H. M. , Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83.
11.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
12.
Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of place: An empirical measurement. Geoforum, 22, 347-358.
13.
Shumaker, S. A. , & Taylor, R. B. (1993). Toward a classification of people-place relationships: A model of attachment to place. In N. R. Feimer & E. S. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives (pp. 219-251). New York: Praeger.
14.
Skjåk, K. K. , & Bøyum, B. (1995). Survey on national identity 1995 (Report no. 103) [In Norwegian]. Bergen: Norwegian Social Data Services.
15.
Stokols, D. (1990). Instrumental and spiritual views of people-environment relations. American Psychologist, 45(5), 641-646.
16.
Tuan, Y-F. (1980). Rootedness versus sense of place. Landscape, 24, 3-8.
17.
Vorkinn, M. (1998). Local attitudes towards natural resource management—the significance of place attachment and social identity. Environmental Management, 22(5), 737-746.
18.
Williams, D. R. , & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1989, October). Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. Paper presented at the NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research, San Antonio, Texas.
19.
Williams, D. R. , & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1990, May). A framework for examining the meaning of recreation places: Place attachment, mode of experience, and environmental dispositions. In J. H. Gramann (Ed.), Proceedings. The third symposium on social science in resource management (pp. 70-72). College Station: Texas A&M University.
20.
Williams, D. R. , Patterson, M. E., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences, 14, 29-46.
21.
Young, J. M. , Williams, D. R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1990). The role of involvement in identifying users’ preferences for social standards in the Cohutta Wilderness. In D. Hope, II (Ed.), Proceedings. 1990 Southeastern Recreation Research Conference (pp. 173-183). Athens, GA: USDA Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station.
