Under international law, the cultivation of opium poppy, coca bush, and cannabis plant is allowed only for limited medical and scientific purposes. All other cultivation of these plants is marked for removal via eradication or other means, and strategies to implement these laws are reviewed. Globally, the annual risk of eradication is consistently below 10% for each crop. Evidence regarding socioeconomic development policies is taken from over two decades of United Nations programs in 11 countries. Using any measure of performance, they have had little impact. Even with marginal revisions in their methodology, the likelihood of these policies achieving their aims in the near future seems minimal.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BuddenburgD.1996Illicit Drugs and Drug Policies in Pakistan. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development and United Nations University Studies on the Impact of the Illegal Drug Trade. London:Lynne Rienner.
2.
Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ) (German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development)1992Conclusions of the seminar on alternative development as a tool against illicit drug cultivation (Berlin, April 1992). Paper presented to Organization of American States Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD), September 7 1993, Lima, Peru.
3.
Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ) (German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development)1995Drug Control with the Scope of Development Cooperation. Bonn:BMZ April.
4.
CICAD (Organization of American States, Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission)1993Alternative development: A critical dimension of illicit international drug traffic. Paper presented to Organization of American States Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD), September 7, Lima, Peru. Washington, D.C.: Cicad.
5.
ClawsonP.1994How Profitable for Farmers Is Production of Coca Leaves?. Washington, DC:U.S. Department of State report of ‘the economics of the narcotics industry’ conference.
6.
ClaytonR.R.1995Marijuana in the “Third World”: Appalachia, U.S.A.London:Lynne Rienner, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development and United Nations University Studies on the Impact of the Illegal Drug Trade, vol. 5.
7.
ColemanG.1987Logical framework approach to the monitoring and evaluation of agricultural and rural development projects. Project Appraisal2(4)251–259.
8.
Colombia, Republic of1995National Alternative Development Plan 1995–1998, Action Plan. Republic of Colombia:Office of the President.
9.
DuranaP.J.1994Alternative Development as a Coca Reduction Strategy in the Andean Region: Lessons from past Efforts. Washington, DC:U.S. Department of State report of ‘the economics of the narcotics industry’ conference.
10.
FalcoM.1996U.S. drug policy: Addicted to failure. Foreign Policy102(Spring) 120–133.
11.
FarrellG.1996The global rate of interception of illicit opiates and cocaine, 1980–1994. Transnational Organized Crimevol. 1, no 4.
12.
FarrellG.O'BrienP.1995Para la reduccion de oferta de drogas ilicitas. Debate Agrario, 22, 81–117.
13.
FarrellG.MansurK.TullisM.1996Cocaine and heroin in Europe: A cross-national comparison of trafficking and prices. British Journal of Criminology35(2)255–281.
14.
GoldsteinP.1985The drugs/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues4:493–506.
15.
GutelmanM.DorseyJ.JhonesJ. n.d. Informe de la Mision Evaluacion de la Estrategia del UNDCP: Bolivia; Informe de la Mision Evaluacion de la Estrategia del UNDCP: Colombia;and Informe de la Mision Evaluacion de la Estrategia del UNDCP: Pere. Vienna: UNDCP unpublished manuscripts prepared in 1993.
16.
HenkelR.1994Coca Crop Substitution and Alternative Development in Bolivia. Washington DC:U.S. Department of State report of ‘the economics of the narcotics industry’ conference
17.
HesselingRene1994Displacement: A review of the empirical literature. In Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 3, ed. ClarkeR. V., New York:Criminal Justice Press.
18.
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)1992Participatory Evaluation of Rural Development Projects. Rome:IFAD Monitoring and Evaluation Division, Report No. 0385, December.
19.
International Narcotics Control Board1995Narcotic Drugs: Estimated World Requirements for 1995, Statistics for 1993. New York:United Nations.
20.
International Trade Centre1993Market Access to the United States and the European Community for Selected Products from the Andean Region. Geneva:UNCTAD/GATT.
21.
KahnS.1991Poppy cultivation in north-west frontier province 1991. Report prepared for the Rural Development Division, U.S. Agency for International Development, Islamabad, Dec., p.31.
22.
KaplanJ.1983The Hardest Drug: Heroin and Public Policy. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
23.
KehD.FarrellG., 1997Trafficking drugs in the global village. Transnational Organized Crime3(2):90–110
24.
KellermanT.1994Overall Importance and Impact of the Coca Subsector with Regards to the Economies of the Andean Countries of Bolivia, Colombia and Peru. Washington, DC:U.S. Department of State report of ‘the economics of the narcotics industry’ conference.
25.
KennedyM.ReuterP.RileyK. J., 1993A simple economic model of cocaine production. Mathematical and Computer Modelling17(2): 19–36.
26.
KumarK.1986A Review of AID's Narcotic Control Development Assistance Program. U.S. Agency for International Development Evaluation Special Study No. 29.
27.
KumarK.1994Measuring performance of agricultural and rural development programs. Paper presented to Conference on Evaluation and Development, hosted by the World Bank, December 5 and 6, 1994. Centre for Development Information and Evaluation, U.S. Agency for International Development.
28.
LasselinD.GaltierB.1993Survey of the Opium Growing Areas using SPOT imagery: Teaching Kit. France International: Institute Geographique National.
29.
LeeR.1994Controlling Production of Opiates: The Case of Thailand. Washington, DC:U.S. Department of State report of ‘the economics of the narcotics industry’ conference.
30.
LeeR.ClawsonP.1993Crop Substitution in the Andes. Washington, DC:Office of National Drug Control Policy.
31.
LittoyS. n.d. Opium poppy cultivation report (Viet Nam Drug abuse control masterplan formulation exercise VIE/92/660). Vienna:UNDCP unpublished manuscript, 1993.
32.
LyonD.L.1993Alternative development as a tool against illicit drug production. U.S. Department of State, Bureau of International Narcotics Matters, Office of Transnational Issues, paper presented to Organization of American States Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission, Sept. 7, Lima, Peru.
33.
MansfieldD.SageC. n.d. Drug crop producing countries: A development perspective. The Control of Drugs and Drug Users: Reasons and Reactions. Harwood Academic Press, in press.
34.
McCoyA.W.1992Heroin as a Global Commodity: A History of Southeast Asia's Opium Trade.
35.
MooreM.R.H.1973Policies to achieve discrimination on the effective price of heroin. American Economic Review2:270–277.
36.
MooreM. R. H.1991Supply reduction and drug law enforcement. In Drugs and Crime, vol. 13 of Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, eds. TonryM.WilsonJ. Q., Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
37.
MoralesE.1990Comprehensive economic development: An alternative measure to reduce cocaine supply. Journal of Drug Issues20(4):629–637.
38.
MorelandR.KampeK.ShinawatraB.1993Evaluation of assistance in alternative development in Thailand. Vienna: UNDCP report to the United Nations International Drug Control Programme unpublished manuscript, May.
39.
National Narcotics Intelligence Consumers Committee (NNICC)1995The Supply of Illicit Drugs to the United States. Washington, DC:Drug Enforcement Administration, August.
40.
PainterJ.1994Bolivia and Coca: A Study in Dependency. London:Lynne Rienner, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development and United Nations University Studies of the Impact of the Illegal Drug Tradevol. 1.
41.
Pakistan Narcotics Control Board (PNCB) PNCB)1974Buner Pilot Project. Islamabad:PNCB.
42.
Pakistan Narcotics Control Board (PNCB)1975Socioeconomic Survey of Buner. Islamabad:PNCB.
43.
PoolD.J.1994Prospects for Alternative Development. Washington, DC:U.S. Department of State report of ‘the economics of the narcotics industry’ conference.
44.
RenardR.D.1996The Burmese Connection: Illegal Drugs and the Making of the Golden Triangle. London:Lynne Rienner, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development and United Nations University Studies on the Impact of the Illegal Drug Trade, vol. 6.
45.
RerkasemK.RerkasemB.Kaosa-ArdM.RoongruangseeC.IsrangkuraA.1989Highland development as a narcotic prevention strategy. UNISERV, Chiang Mai University report prepared for U.S. Agency for International Development.
46.
ReuterP.1985Eternal hope: America's quest for narcotics control. Public Interest79:79–95.
47.
ReuterP.1992The limits and consequences of U.S. foreign drug control efforts. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences521:521–162. Santa Monica, CA:RAND Corporation reprint.
48.
ReuterP.1994the Organization and Measurement of the International Drug Trade. Washington, DC:U.S. Department of State report of ‘the economics of the narcotics industry’ conference.
49.
ReuterP.1996The mismeasurement of illegal drug markets: The implications of its irrelevance. In Exploring the Underground Economy, ed. PozoSusan. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute.
50.
ReuterP.KleimanM.R.1986Risks and prices: An economic analysis of drug enforcement. In Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, vol. 7, eds. TonryM.MorrisN., Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
51.
ReuterP.RonfeldtD.1992Quest for Integrity: The Mexican-U.S. Drug Issue in the 1980's. Santa Monica, CA:RAND Corporation.
52.
RileyK.J.1993Snow Job: The Efficacy of Source Country Cocaine Policies. Santa Monica, CA:RAND Corporation.
53.
RileyK.J.1996Snow Job: The War Against International Cocaine Trafficking. London: Transaction.
54.
RosenquistE.1994Narcotics and Agricultural Economics. Washington, DC:U.S. Department of State rport of ‘the economics of the narcotics industry’ conference.
55.
SaderS.A.1991Remote sensing of illicit narcotic crops from aircraft and commercial satellite platforms. Paper presented at the 24th international symposium on remote sensing of environment, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, May 27–31.
56.
SageC.1989Drugs and economic development in Latin America: A study in the political economy of cocaine in Bolivia. In Corruption, Development and Inequality: Soft Touch or Hard Graft?, ed. WardP. M., 38–57. New York:Routledge.
57.
StaresPaul1995The global drug phenomenon: Implications for policy. In Policies and Strategies to Combat Drugs in Europe, ed. EstievenartGeorges. London: Martinus Nijhoff.
58.
ThoumiF.E.1987Some implications of the growth of the underground economy in Colombia. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs29(2):35–53.
59.
ThoumiF.E.1995Political Economy and Illegal Drugs in Colombia. London:Lynne Rienner, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development and United Nations University Studies on the Impact of the Illegal Drug Trade, vol. 2.
60.
ToroM.C.1995Mexico's “War” on Drugs: Causes and Consequences. London:Lynne Rienner, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development and United Nations University Studies on the Impact of the Illegal Drug Trade, vol. 3.
61.
TullisL.1991Handbook of Research on the Illicit Drug Traffic: Socioeconomic and Political Consequences. London:Greenwood Press.
62.
TullisL.1995Unintended Consequences: Illegal Drugs and Drug Policies in Nine Countries. London:Lynne Rienner, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development and United Nations University Studies on the Impact of the Illegal Drug Trade, vol. 4.
63.
United Nations1977Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 as Amended by the 1972 Protocol Amending the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961. New York:United Nations.
64.
United Nations1991United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1988. New York:United Nations.
65.
United Nations Administrative Committee on Coordination1995Report of the Subcommittee on Rural Development on its Twenty-Third Session. Paris, May 31 - June 2, 1995.
66.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)1995Human Development Report 1995. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
67.
United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)1989Report of the expert group meeting on environmentally safe methods for the eradication of illicit narcotic plants held in Vienna Dec. 4 to 8, 1989. Commission on Narcotic Drugs, 11th special session document E/CN.7/1990/CRP.7.
68.
United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)1973Operations Financed by the United Nations Fund for Drug Abuse Control: Report of the Executive Director. Commission on Narcotic Drugs, 3rd special session document E/CN.7/562.
69.
United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)1995aThe Economic and Social Consequences of Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking, An Interim Report: Note by the Secretariat. Commission on Narcotic Drugs, 38th session document E/CN.7/1995/3, March 14–23.
70.
United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)1995bProposed Final and Performance Report for the Biennium 1994–1995 for the Fund of the United Nations International Drug Control Programme and Proposed Initial Budget for the Biennium 1996–1997 for the Fund and Programme Support Cost: Report of the Executive Director. Commission on Narcotic Drugs, reconvened 38th session document E/CN.7/1995/21, Dec. 13–14.
71.
United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)1996Crops from which Drugs are Extracted and Appropriate Strategies for their Reduction. Commission on Narcotic Drugs, 39th session document E/CN.7/1996/11, April 16–25.
72.
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)1985Drug crop substitution. Gcneva: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization background paper prepared by the for the inter-agency meeting on coordination in matters of international drug abuse control, Rome, Sept. 11–13.
73.
United Nations Fund for Drug Abuse Control (UNFDAC)1986Drug problems and development. Staff paper for the OECD ad hoc meeting on the role of development agencies in narcotics reduction, May 27–28.
74.
United Nations International Drug Control Programme (UNDCP)1993Alternative development as an instrument of drug control. Vienna: Undcp Technical Information Paper No. 5, November.
75.
United Nations International Drug Control Programme(UNDCP). 1994UNDCP Activities in Peru 1984–1993. Vienna:UNDCP.
76.
United Nations International Drug Control Programme (UNDCP)1996Statistics on illicit trafficking in and supply of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in 1994. Document E/CN.7/1996/CRP.6 to the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, April 1996. Vienna: UNDCP.
77.
United Nations International Drug Control Programme (UNDCP) n.d.a Afghanistan: Opium cultivation and production1994. Vienna:UNDCP unpublished manuscript by UNDCP Regional Office for Southwest Asia, 1994.
78.
United Nations International Drug Control Programme (UNDCP) n.d.b The illicit opiate industry of Pakistan. Vienna:UNDCP unpublished manuscript, 1994.
79.
United Nations International Drug Control Programme (UNDCP) n.d.c Afghanistan: Opium cultivation and production1995. Vienna:UNDCP unpublished manuscript by UNDCP Regional Office for Southwest Asia, 1995.
80.
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)1993Andean Counter-Drug Initiative, Objective IV: Sustainable Development and the Counter-narcotics Strategy: Transition to New Realities. U.S. Agency for International Development Semi-annual Report Sept.
81.
U.S. Department of State variedInternational Narcotics Control Strategy Report. Washington, DC:U.S. Department of State, various dates.
82.
U.S. Department of Agriculture1992Thailand Opium Yield Project 1991–1992. Beltsville, MD:U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Systems Research Laboratory.
83.
WhynesD.1991Illicit drug production and supply-side drugs policy in Asia and South America. Development and Change22:475–496.
