CahehL. S.RombergT. A., & ZwirnerW.The estimation of mean achievement scores for schools by the item-sampling technique. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1970; 30, 41–60.
2.
CooleyW. W.Computer assistance for individualized education. Journal of Educational Data Processing, 1970; 7, 18–28.
3.
DuBoisP. H.A history of psychological testing.Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1970.
4.
EbelR. L.The value of internal consistency in classroom examinations. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968; 5, 71–73.
5.
FlanaganJ. C.Discussion of symposium: Standard scores for aptitude and achievement tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1962; 22, 35–39.
6.
FlanaganJ. C.Program for learning in accordance with needs. Psychology in The Schools, 1969; 6, 133–136.
7.
FlanaganJ. C.The role of the computer in PLAN. Journal of Educational Data Processing, 1970; 7, 7–17.
8.
GlaserR.Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: Some questions. American Psychologist, 1963; 18, 519–521.
9.
GorthW. P.Designing instructional systems with longitudinal testing using item sampling techniques. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota, March 1970.
10.
HivelyW.PattersonH.L., & PageS. H.A universe-defined system of arithmetic achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968; 5, 275–290.
11.
HornJ. L.Some characteristics of classroom examinations. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1966; 3, 293–295.
12.
HornJ. L.Is it reasonable for assessments to have different psychometric properties than predictors?Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968; 5, 75–77.
13.
KulkarniS. S.The nature and format of criterion tests in the context of programmed learning. In IngenkampK. (Ed.), Developments in educational testing. Vol. 2. New York: Gordon & Breach, 1969.
14.
LoevingerJ.Person and population as psychometric concepts. Psychological Review, 1965; 72, 143–155.
15.
LordF. M.Use of true-score theory to predict moments of univariate and bivariate observed-score distributions. Psychometrika, 1960; 25, 325–342.
16.
LordF. M.Estimating norms by item sampling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1962; 22, 259–267. (a)
17.
LordF. M.Cutting scores and errors of measurement. Psychometrika, 1962; 27, 19–30. (b)
18.
LordF. M.Cutting scores and errors of measurement: A second case. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1963; 23, 63–68.
19.
LordF. M., & NovickM. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores.Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
20.
MoxleyR. A.A source of disorder in the schools and a way to reduce it: Two kinds of tests. Teacher & Technology, 1970; 1, 3–6.
21.
OsburnH. G.A note on design of test experiments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1967; 27, 797–802.
22.
OsburnH. G.Item sampling for achievement testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1968; 28, 95–104.
23.
OsburnH. G.The effect of item stratification on errors of measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1969; 29, 295–301.
24.
OsburnH. G., & ShoemakerD. M.Pilot project on computer generated test items. Final Report, 1968; Project No. 6-8533, Grant No. OEG-1-7-068533-3917, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
25.
PlumleeL. B.Estimating means and standard deviations from partial data—an empirical check on Lord's item sampling technique. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1964; 24, 623–630.
26.
PophamW. J., & HusekT. R.Implications of criterion-referenced measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1969; 6, 1–9.
27.
ShoemakerD. M.Test statistics as a function of item arrangement. Journal of Experimental Education, 1970; 39, 85–88. (a)
28.
ShoemakerD. M.Allocation of items and examinees in estimating a norm distribution by item sampling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1970; 7, 123–128. (b)
29.
ShoemakerD. M.Item-examinee sampling procedures and associated standard errors in estimating test parameters. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1970; 7, 255–262. (c)
ShoemakerD. M.Further results on the standard errors of estimate associated with item-examinee sampling procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971; 8, 215–220. (b)
32.
ShoemakerD. M., & OkadaM.The communications skills program and concomitant spelling proficiency. Unpublished manuscript, Southwest Regional Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, Inglewood, California, 1970.
33.
ShoemakerD. M., & OsburnH. G.An empirical study of generalizability coefficients for unmatched data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1968; 21, 239–246.
34.
ShoemakerD. M., & OsburnH. G.Computer-aided item sampling for achievement testing: A description of a computer program implementing the universe defined test concept. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1969; 29, 165–172.
35.
SimonG. B.Comments on “Implications of criterion-referenced measurement.”Journal of Educational Measurement, 1969; 6, 259–260.
36.
SirotnikK.An investigation of the context effect in matrix sampling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1970; 7, 199–207.
