Classical estimation procedures that are often used in estimating the population audit value rely on the assumption of normality. Empirical evidence suggests however, that this may not be a valid assumption. Consequently, the use of normal theory methods may lead to errone ous or misleading conclusions. The boot strap method is an effective alternative in many cases where the classical assumptions are in question. The bootstrap method replaces complex analytical techniques by computer intensive, simulation based, empirical analysis. This study illustrates the use of the bootstrap method in estimating the audit value from skewed populations and small samples. The results of Monte-Carlo simulations indicate that the bootstrap is more effective and efficient than the normal theory method.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arens, A.A. and J.K. Loebbecke, Applications of Statistical Sampling to Auditing, Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1981.
2.
Bickel, P.J. and D.A. Freedman, "Asymptotic Normality and the Bootstrap in Stratified Sampling," The Annals of Statistics, 12 (1984 ), 470-482.
3.
Burgin, T.A., "The Gamma Distribution in Inventory Control," Operational Research Quarterly, 23 (1975), 507-525.
4.
Chan, K.H. and P. Tryfos, "Audit Sampling from Skewed Populations and Small Samples," Accounting and Business Research, 14 ( 1984), 311-318.
5.
Diaconis, P. and B. Efron, "Computer Intensive Methods in Statistics," Scientific American, 248 (1983), 116-130.
6.
Efron, B., "Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife,' The Annals of Statistics, 7 (1979 ), 1-26.
7.
Efron, B., "Better Bootstrap Confidence Intervals," Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82 (1987),171-201.
8.
Efron, B. and R. Tibshirani, "Bootstrap Methods and Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy," Statistical Science, (1986), 54-77.
9.
Freedman, D.A. and S.C. Peters, "Bootstrapping an Econometric Model: Some Empirical Results," Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2 (1984a), 150-158.
10.
Freedman, D.A. and S.C. Peters, "Bootstrapping a Regression Equation: Some Empirical Results,' Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79 (1984b), 97-106.
11.
IMSL/STAT Library - Fortran Subroutines for Statistical Analysis Vol. 3, Problem Solving Software Systems, Houston, Texas, 1989.
12.
Johnson, N.I. and S. Kotz, Continuous Univariate Distributions, Houghton Mifflin Company , Boston, 1970.
13.
Law, A.M. and W.D. Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis, McGraw Hill Book Company , New York, 1982.
14.
Lunneborg, C.E., "Estimating the Correlation Coefficient: The Bootstrap Approach," Psychological Bulletin, 82 (1985 ), 209-215.
15.
Muralidhar, K., "Using the Bootstrap Method to Determine Persistence of Skewness in Stock Returns," DSIS Working Paper # 89-10, Florida International University, Miami, 1989.
16.
Muralidhar, K. and M.J. Tretter, "The Evolution of an Expert DSS for Electric Utility Load Research ," Computers & Operations Research, 16 (1989), 247-256.
17.
Neter, J. and J.K. Loebbecke, "Behavior of Major Statistical Estimators in Sampling Accounting Populations: An Empirical Study," AICPA (1975).
18.
Pritsker, A.A.B. and C.D. Pegden, Introduction to Simulation and SLAM, Systems Publishing Corporation, West Laffayette,1979 .
19.
Singh, K., "On the Asymptotic Accuracy of Efron's Bootstrap," The Annals of Statistics, 9 (1981 ),1187-1195.
