This study investigated the coping strategies of 11 students for whom multiple reading media were recommended (multi-readers are those who combine braille, print, and auditory reading functionally at school and in leisure activities). These students were in Grades 5–10 in mainstream schools in Norway. Four students were identified as multi-readers. The dominant coping strategy for the students was auditory reading.
CarlstenC. T. (2002). Lærerveiledning 8., 9. og 10. klasse. [Teacher's guide, Grades 8, 9, and 10] Oslo: N. W. Damm & Son.
3.
EkU., FelleniusK., & JacobsonL. (2003). Reading acquisition, cognitive and visual development and self-esteem in four children with cerebral visual impairment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 741–754.
4.
EngenL. (2003). Kartlegging av leseferdighet 5. klasse Idehefte [Assessment of reading acquisitions, Grade 5]. Stavanger, Norway: National Center for Reading Education and Research.
5.
FelleniusK. (1996). Reading competence of visually impaired pupils in Sweden. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 237–246.
6.
FelleniusK. (1999). Reading acquisition in pupils with visual impairment in mainstream education (Doctoral dissertation). Stockholm: Stockholm Institute of Education Press.
7.
FelleniusK., & MyrbergM. (1993). Synskadades läsning II. Vem vet vad om synskadade elevers läsning? [The reading of visually impaired II: Who knows anything about the reading of visually impaired students?]. Stockholm: Institutionen för pedagogik, Högskolan för lärarutbildning i Stockholm, HLS Förlag.
8.
GallM. D., GallJ. P., & BorgW. R. (2007). Collecting research data with questionnaires and interviews. In Educational Research: An Introduction (8th ed., pp. 227–261). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
HolbrookM. C., & KoenigA. J. (1992). Teaching braille reading to students with low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 44–48.
10.
KoenigA. J. (1992). A framework for understanding the literacy of individuals with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 277–285.
11.
KoenigA. J. (1996). Selection of learning and literacy media for children and youths with low vision. In CornA. L., & KoenigA. J. (Eds.), Foundations of low vision: Clinical and functional perspectives (pp. 246–278). New York: AFB Press.
12.
KoenigA. J., & HolbrookM. C. (1989). Determining the reading medium for students with visual impairments: A diagnostic teaching approach. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 296–302.
13.
LaytonC. A. (1997). Assessing the Literacy Skills of Students who are Blind or Visually Impaired. In WormsleyD. P., and D'AndreaF. M. (Eds.). Instructional Strategies for Braille Literacy.New York: AFB Press, pp. 231–263.
14.
Læringssenteret. (2003). Kartlegging av leseferdighet 5. klasse [Assessment of reading acquisition, Grade 5]. Stavanger, Norway: National Center for Reading Education and Research.
15.
LeggeG. E., MadisonC. M., & MansfieldJ. S. (1999). Measuring braille reading speed with the MNREAD test. Visual Impairment Research, 1, 131–145.
16.
LuskK. E., & CornA. L. (2006a). Learning and using print and braille: A study of dual media readers, Part 1. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 606–619.
17.
LuskK. E., & CornA. L. (2006b). Learning and using print and braille: A study of dual media readers, Part 2. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 653–665.
18.
LundR., & WatsonG. R. (1997). The CCTV book: Habilitation and rehabilitation with closed-circuit television systems.Froland, Norway: Synsforum.
19.
MangoldS., & MangoldP. (1989). Selecting the most appropriate primary learning medium for students with functional vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 294–296.
20.
Nasjonalt Læremiddelsenter. (1999). Kartlegging av leseferdighet 7. klasse (tidligere 6. klasse) [Assessment of reading acquisition, Grade 7]. Stavanger, Norway: National Center for Reading Education and Research.
Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2004). Nasjonale prøver. Lesing 10. trinn [National assessment of literacy, Grade 10]. Oslo: National Board of Education.
23.
National Research Ethics Committee for Social Sciences and the Humanities. (2006). Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences, law and the humanities. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.etikkom.no/English/NESH/Guidelines.
24.
OftedalM. (1999). Kartlegging av leseferdighet 7. klasse, idehefte [Assessment of reading acquisition, Grade 7]. Stavanger, Norway: National Center for Reading Education and Research.
25.
RexE. J., KoenigA. J., WormsleyD. P., & BakerR. L. (1994). Foundations of braille literacy.New York: AFB Press.
26.
SommerschildH. (1998). Mestring som styrende begrep [Coping as a leading term]. In GjærumB., GrøholtB., & SommerschildH. (Eds.), Mestring som mulighet i møte med barn, ungdom og foreldre [Coping as a possibility when counseling children, adolescents, and parents] (pp. 21–63). Oslo: Tano Aschehoug.
27.
TobinM. J. (1985). The reading skills of the partially sighted: Their implications for integrated education. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 8, 467–467.
28.
TobinM. J. (1994). Assessing visually handicapped people.London: David Fulton.
29.
TønnesenF. E. (1995). Literacy in Norway. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39, 244–248.
30.
VikA. K. (1997). “Fortunately she doesn't have to use braille”:—The personal experiences of a visually impaired child. In From Dots to Literacy: A Nordic seminar at TRC (pp. 29–31). Stockholm: Tomteboda Resource Center.
31.
WilhelmsenG. B. (2003). Å se er ikke alltid nok: Synsforstyrrelser etter hjerneskader og mulige tiltak. [To see is not always enough: Visual impairment from brain damage and possible measures]. Oslo: Unipub forlag.
