Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.1981. The Federal Influence on State and Local Roles in the Federal System (Report A-89). Washington, D.C.: ACIR.
2.
AleschDaniel J., and PetakWilliam J.. 1986. The Politics, and Economics of Earthquake Hazard Mitigation (Monograph #43). Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
3.
BardachEugene. 1977. The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes Law.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
BlairM.L., and SpangleW.E.. 1979. Seismic Safety and Land Use Planning: Selected Examples from California (U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 941–B). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
5.
CobbRoger W., and ElderCharles D.. 1983. Participation in American Politics: The. Dynamics of Agenda Building (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
6.
DiverColin S.1980. “A Theory of Regulatory Enforcement.” Public Policy28: 257–299.
7.
DrabekThomas E., and MushkatelAlvin H., and KilijanekThomas S.. 1983. Earthquake Mitigation Policy: The Experience of Two States (Monograph #37). Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
8.
ElazarDaniel. 1984. American Federalism: A View form the States (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
9.
ElmoreRichard F.1979–80. “Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions.” Political Science Quarterly94: 601–616.
10.
ElmoreRichard F.1983. “Forward and Backward Mapping: Reversible Logic in the Analysis of Public Policy.” Paper presented to the International Workshop on Interorganizational Implementation Systems, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands, June 27–30.
11.
Executive Office of the President.1978. The National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program.Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President.
12.
EyestoneRobert. 1977. “Confusion, Diffusion and Innovations.” American Political Science Review71: 441–447.
13.
Federal Emergency Management Agency.1984. National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program: Five Year Plan, Fiscal Year 1985–1989. Report to the United State Congress.Washington, D.C.: FEMA.
14.
Federal Emergency Management Agency.1987. National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program: Fiscal Year 1986 Activities. Report to the United States Congress.Washington, D.C.: FEMA.
15.
GrodzinsMorton. 1966. The American System: A New View of Government in the United States, edited by ElazarDaniel. Chicago: Rand McNally.
16.
HavelockRonald G.1969. Planning for Innovation Through Dissemination and Utilization of Knowledge.Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, Institute for Social Research.
17.
HuffmanJames. 1986. Government Liability and Disaster Mitigation, A Comparative Study.Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
18.
JaffeMartin, and ButlerJoAnn, and ThurowCharles. 1981. Reducing Earthquake Risks: A Planner's Guide (Planning Advisory Service Report No. 364). Chicago: American Planning Association.
19.
JenkinsJ. Craig. 1983. “Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology9: 527–553.
20.
KettlDonald F.1983. The Regulation of American Federalism.Baton Rouge and London: Louisiana State University Press.
21.
KingdonJohn W.1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies.Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
22.
KnottJack, and WildavskyAaron. 1980. “If Dissemination is the Solution, What is the Problem?” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization1: 537–578.
23.
KockelmanWilliam J.1983. Examples of the Use of Geologic and Seismologic Information for Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Southern California (USGS Open file report 83–82). Washington, D.C.: USGS.
24.
KunreutherHoward, and GinsbergR., and MillerL., and SagiP., and SlovicP., and BorkanP., and KatzN.. 1978. Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons.Nw York: John Wiley and Sons.
25.
LambrightW. Henry. 1979. Technology Transfer to Cities: Processes of Choice at the Local Level.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26.
LambrightW. Henry. 1984. The Role of States in Earthquake and Natural Hazard Innovation at the Local Level: A Decision-making Study.Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Research Corporation.
27.
LindblomCharles E., and CohenDavid K.. 1979. Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving.New Haven: Yale University Press.
28.
MayPeter J., and BoltonPatricia. 1986. “Reassessing Earthquake Hazards Reduction Measures.” Journal of the American Planning Association52: 443–451.
29.
MayPeter J., and WilliamsWalter. 1986. Disaster Policy Implementation: Managing Programs Under Shared Governance.New York: Plenum Press.
30.
McKeanRoland N.1980. “Enforcement Costs in Environmental and Safety Regulation.” Policy Analysis6: 269–289.
31.
MeltsnerArnold J.1978. “Public Support for Seismic Safety: Where Is It In California?” Mass Emergencies3: 167–184.
32.
MushkatelAlvin, and NiggJoanne M.. 1987. “Effect of Objective Risk on Key Actor Support for Seismic Mitigation Policy.” Journal of Environmental Management11: 77–86.
33.
NicholsDonald R.1982. “Reducing Earthquake Damage Through Land-use Planning.” Pp. 127–143 in Proceedings of Conference XV, Workshop on Preparing for and Responding to a Damaging Earthquake in the Eastern V. S., edited by HaysWalter. Reston, VA: USGS.
34.
OlsonRichard S., with SvensonArthur G., and NilsonDouglas C.. 1985. The Utah Seismic Safely Advisory Council, 1977–81 and the Utah Multi-Hazard Mitigation Project, 1982–85 (Report to the National Science Foundation). Tempe, AZ: School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University.
35.
O'TooleLaurence J.Jr.1986. “Policy Recommendations for Multi-Actor Implementation: An Assessment of the Field.” Journal of Public Policy6: 181–210.
36.
PalmRisa. 1981. Real Estate Agents and Special Studies Zones Disclosure, The Response of California Home Buyers to Earthquake Hazards Information (Monograph #32 of the Program on Technology, Environment and Man). Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
37.
PalmRisa. 1983. Home Mortgage Lenders, Real Property Appraisers and Earthquake Hazards (Monograph #38 of the Program on Technology, Environment and Man). Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
38.
PressmanJeffrey L., and WildavskyAaron. 1973. Implementation.Berkeley: University of California Press.
39.
RossiPeter H., and WrightJames D., and Weber-BurdinE.. 1982. Natural Hazards and Public Choice: The State and Local Politics of Hazard Mitigation.New York: Academic Press.
40.
SavageRobert L.1985. “Diffusion Research Traditions and the Spread of Policy Innovations in a Federal System.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism15: 1–27.
41.
SelkreggLidia L., and EndereRichard L., and JohnsonStephen F., and KimJohn C.K., GorskiSusan E., with PreussJane, and KelsoDuncan. 1984. Earthquake Hazard Mitigation, Planning and Policy Implementation, The Alaska Case. Final Report to the National Science Foundation.Anchorage: University of Alaska.
42.
StiglerGeorge J.1970. “The Optimum Enforcement of Laws.” Journal of Political Economy70: 526–536.
43.
TurnerRalph, and NiggJoanne, and HellerDenise. 1986. Waiting for Disaster: Earthquake Watch in California.Berkeley: University of California Press.
44.
von WinterfeldtDetlof, and EdwardsWard. 1986. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
WalkerJack. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations Among States.” American Political Science Review63: 880–899.
46.
WilliamsWalter. 1980. Government by Agency: Lessons of the Social Programs Grant - in -A id Experience.New York: Academic Press.
47.
WynerAlan J., and MannDean E.. 1986. Preparing for California's Earthquakes: Local Government and Seismic Safely.Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California-Berkeley.
48.
YinRobert K., and GwaltneyMargaret K.. 1981. “Knowledge Utilization as a Networking Process.” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization2(June): 555–580.
49.
YinRobert K., and HealdKaren A., and VogelMary E.. 1977. Tinkering with the System: Technological Innovations in State and Local Services.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
50.
YinRobert K., and MooreGwendolyn B.. 1985. The Utilization of Research: Lessons from the Natural Hazards Field.Washington, D.C.: Cosmos Corporation.