BuellBradley, and Associates, Community Planning for Human Services, Columbia University Press, New York, 1952.
2.
Multi-Problem Families and Casework Practice, New York City Chapter, National Association of Social Workers, New York, 1960 (mimeographed).
3.
See, for example, GeismarL. L., and AyresBeverly, Families in Trouble, Family Centered Project, Greater St. Paul Community Chest and Councils, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1958; L. L. Geismar and Beverly Ayres, Patterns of Change in Problem Families, Family Centered Project, Greater St. Paul Community Chest and Councils, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1959; Reaching the Unreached Family, Youth Board Monograph No. 5, New York City Youth Board, New York, 1958; A Study of Some of the Characteristics of 150 Multiproblem Families, New York City Youth Board, New York, 1957 (mimeographed); Kenneth Dick and Lydia J. Strnad, “The Multi-problem Family and Problems of Service,” Social Casework, Vol. XXXIX, June 1958, pp. 349–55; Elizabeth Wood, The Small Hard Core, Citizens' Housing and Planning Council of New York, New York, 1957; Kermit T. Wiltse, “The ‘Hopeless’ Family,” Social Work, Vol. III, October 1958, pp. 12–22.
4.
MeierElizabeth G., “Casework Services to ADC Families,”Public Welfare, Vol. XIX, January 1961, pp. 19–22.
5.
Poverty and Deprivation In The United States: The Plight Of Two-Fifths Of A Nation, Conference on Economic Progress, Washington, D.C., 1962, p. 2.
6.
MillerWalter B., “Implications of Urban Lower-Class Culture for Social Work,”Social Service Review, Vol. XXXIII, September 1959, p. 234.
7.
StammIsabel L., “Ego Psychology in the Emerging Theoretical Base of Casework,” in Issues in American Social Work, KahnAlfred J. (ed.), Columbia University Press, New York, 1959, p. 87.
8.
HaasWalter, “Reaching Out—A Dynamic Concept in Casework,”Social Work, Vol. IV, July 1959, p. 44.
9.
AddamsJane, “The Subtle Problems of Charity,”Atlantic Monthly, Vol. LXXXIII, February 1899, pp. 163–78.