This investigation examined the role played by gender and communication content in the leadership emergence process in small, task-oriented groups. Six hours of transcribed group interaction from a sample of the group deliberations of six mixed-sex groups engaged in a 4-month long decision-making project served as the database for the analysis. A simple regression analysis identified task-relevant communication as being the sole significant predictor of emerged leadership. Production of task-relevant communication explained more than 48% of the variance in emerged leadership. Subsequent analysis revealed that no significant gender differences existed in the production of task-relevant communication. Implications of these findings for the study of gender, communication, and leadership are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderton, S. M. , & Jurma, W. E. (1980). Genderless/Gender-related task leader communication and group satisfaction: A test of two hypotheses. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 46,48-60.
2.
Andrews, P. H. (1992). Sex and gender differences in group communication: Impact on the facilitation process. Small Group Research, 23, 74-94.
3.
Baird, J. E., Jr. (1976). Sex differences in group communication: A review of relevant research. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62, 179-192.
4.
Bales, R. G. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A methodfor the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
Barnlund, D. C. , & Haiman, F. S. (1960). The dynamics of decision. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
6.
Benne, K. D. , & Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 41-49.
7.
Bormann, E. G. (1970). The paradox and promise of small group research. Communication Monographs, 37,211-216.
8.
Bormann, E. G. , Pratt, J., & Putnam, L. (1978). Power, authority, and sex: Male response to female leadership. Communication Monographs, 45, 119-155.
9.
Bradley, P. H. (1980). Sex, competence and opinion deviation: An expectation states approach. Communication Monographs, 47, 101-110.
10.
Bunyi, J. M. , & Andrews, P. H. (1985). Gender and leadership: An experimental study. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 50, 246-260.
11.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic.
12.
Cragan, J. F. , & Wright, D. W. (1990). Small group communication research of the 1980s: A synthesis and critique. Communication Studies, 41, 212-236.
13.
Duncan, S. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking tums in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 283-292.
14.
Eagly, A. H. , & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
15.
Eagly, A. H. , & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685-710.
16.
Gouran, D. S. (1982). Making decisions in groups: Choices and consequences. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
17.
Hair, J. F., Jr. , Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Grablowsky, B. J. (1979). Multivariate data analysis. Tulsa, OK: Petroleum.
18.
Hawkins, K. W. , & Stewart, R. A. (1990). Temporal effects of leadership style on state communication apprehension in small task-oriented groups. Communication Research Reports, 7, 3-10.
19.
Hawkins, K. W. , & Stewart, R. A. (1991). Effects of communication apprehension on perceptions of leadership and intragroup attraction in small task-oriented groups. The Southern Communication Journal, 57, 1-10.
20.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1982). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness I: A critical review of inconsistent findings. Communication Quarterly, 30, 134-141.
21.
Hirokawa, R. Y (1983). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness: An investigation of group phases. Human Communication Research, 9, 291-305.
22.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Group communication research: Considerations for the use of interaction analysis. In C. H. Tardy (Ed.), A handbookfor the study of human communication: Methods and instrunents for observing, measuring and assessing communication processes (pp. 229-246). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965-990.
24.
Mabry, E. A. (1989). Some theoretical implications of female and male interaction in unstructured small groups. Small Group Behavior, 20, 536-550.
25.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26.
Owen, W. F. (1986). Rhetorical themes of emergent female leaders. Small Group Behavior, 17,475-486.
27.
Pavitt, C. , & Curtis, E. (1994). Small group discussion: A theoretical approach (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
28.
Poole, M. S. (1983). Decision development in small groups III: A multiple sequence model of group decision development. Communication Monographs, 50, 321-341.
29.
Rosener, J. B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68, 119-125.
30.
Schultz, B. (1978). Predicting emergent leaders: An exploratory study of the salience of communication functions. Small Group Behavior, 9, 109-114.
31.
Schultz, B. (1986). Communication correlates of perceived leaders in the small group. Small Group Behavior, 17,51-65.
32.
Seibert, S. , & Gruenfeld, L. (1992). Masculinity, femininity, and behavior in groups. Small Group Research, 23, 95-112.
33.
Spillman, B. , Spillman, R., & Reinking, A. (1981). Leadership emergence: Dynamic analysis of the effects of sex and androgyny. Small Group Behavior, 12, 139-157.
34.
Winther, D. A. , & Green, S. B. (1987). Another look at gender-related differences in leadership behavior. Sex Roles, 16, 41-56.
