Divisive primaries have traditionally been considered indicators of party organizational weakness and they can have a negative effect on a candidate's prospects for winning the general election. Yet, their causes remain virtually unexplored. This study examines a number of factors that are believed to encourage the development of divisive nomination contests. The results demonstrate that demographic and geographic factors, the status of the seat, its partisan bias, state-level political opportunity structures, and party recruit ment efforts influence the divisiveness of primaries for the U.S. House of Representatives. Some of these variables affect the two parties differently. Population diversity is found to be a major cause of divisive primaries in the Democratic party and to have no effect on Republican contests, while political opportunity structures have an effect on Republican primaries but not Democratic contests. The findings demonstrate that at least part of the explanation for the divisiveness of congressional nomination contests lies in the characteristics of congressional districts themselves.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Political Science Association, Committee on Political Parties.1950. "Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System." American Political Science Review44: supplement.
2.
Banks, Jeffrey S., and D. Roderick Kiewiet .1989. "Explaining Patterns of Competition in Congressional Elections." American Journal of Political Science33: 997-1015.
3.
Barone, Michael and Grant Ujifusa.1986. The Almanac of American Politics. Washington, DC: National Journal.
4.
Bernstein, Robert A.1977. "Divisive Primaries Do Hurt: U.S. Senate Races, 1956-1972 " American Political Science Review71: 541-45.
5.
Black, Gordon S.1974. "Conflict in the Community: A Theory of the Effects of Community Size." American Political Science Review68: 1245-61.
6.
Bond, Jon R.1983. "The Influence of Constituency Diversity on Electoral Competition in Voting for Congress, 1974-1978." Legislative Studies Quarterly8: 201-17.
7.
Born, Richard.1981. "The Influence of House Primary Election Divisiveness on General Election Margins, 1962-1976." Journal of Politics43: 640-61.
8.
Canon, David T.1990. Actors, Athletes, and Astronauts: Political Amateurs in the United States Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Comer, John.1976. "Another Look at the Effects of the Divisive Primary." American Politics Quarterly5: 121-28.
10.
Cotter, Cornelius P., James L. Gibson, John F. Bibby, and Robert J. Huckshorn .1988. Party Organizations in American Politics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
11.
Dahl, Robert A.1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
12.
Dahl, Robert A., and Edward A. Tufte .1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
Davidson, Roger1969. The Role of the Congressman. New York : Pegasus.
14.
Ehrenhalt, Alan.1991. The United States of Ambition. New York: Random House.
15.
Epstein, Leon D.1986. Political Parties in the American Mold. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
16.
Fenno, Richard F.1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
17.
Fowler, Linda L., and Robert D. McClure .1989. Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
18.
Fiorina, Morris P1974. Representatives, Roll Calls and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
19.
Grau, Craig.1981. "Competition in State Legislative Primaries." Legislative Studies Quarterly6: 35-54.
20.
Hacker, Andrew.1965. "Does a 'Divisive' Primary Harm a Candidate's Election Chances?" American Political Science Review59: 105-10.
21.
Herrnson, Paul S.1988. Party Campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Jewell, Malcolm.1984. Parties and Primaries. New York: Praeger.
23.
Jewell, Malcolm, and David M. Olson.1978. American State Political Parties and Elections. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
24.
Kazee, Thomas A.1980. "The Decision to Run for the U.S. Congress: Challenger Attitudes in the 1970s." Legislative Studies Quarterly5: 79-100.
25.
Kenney, Patrick, and Tom Rice.1987. "The Relationship between Divisive Primaries and General Election Outcomes." American Journal of Political Science31: 31-44.
26.
Key, V.O., Jr. 1949. Southern Politics. New York : Vintage Books.
Lengle, James I.1980. "Divisive Presidential Primaries and Party Electoral Prospects, 1932-1976." American Politics Quarterly8: 261-77.
29.
Lieberson, Stanley.1969. "Measuring Population Diversity." American Sociological Review34: 850-62.
30.
Lunch, William M.1987. The Nationalization of American Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
Maisel, L. Sandy.1982. From Obscurity to Oblivion. Knoxville : University of Tennessee Press.
32.
Maisel, L. Sandy, Linda L. Fowler, Ruth S. Jones, and Walter J. Stone .1990. "The Naming of Candidates: Recruitment or Emergence?" in L. Sandy Maisel , ed., The Parties Respond: Changes in the American Party System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
33.
Mayhew, David R.1986. Placing Parties in American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Patterson, Samuel, and Gregory Caldeira.1984. "The Etiology of Partisan Competition." American Political Science Review78: 691-707.
35.
Piereson, James E., and Terry B. Smith.1975. "Primary Divisiveness and General Election Success: A Reexamination." Journal of Politics37: 555-62.
36.
Pitney, John J.1992. "The House Republicans' Electoral Base." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Francisco, March 19-21.
37.
Rae, Douglas, and Michael Taylor1970. The Analysis of Political Cleavages. New Haven: Yale University Press.
38.
Rohde, David W.1979. "Risk Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of the United States House of Representatives." American Journal of Political Science23: 1-26.
39.
Rice, Tom W.1985. "Gubernatorial and Senatorial Primary Elections: Determinants of Competition." American Politics Quarterly13: 426-6.
40.
Sindler, Allan P.1955. "Bifactional Rivalry as an Alternative to Two-Party Competition in Louisiana." American Political Science Review49: 641-62.
41.
Sorauf, Frank J.1968. Party Politics in America. Boston: Little, Brown.
42.
Stone, Walter J.1984. "Pre-nomination Candidate Choice and General Election Behavior: Iowa Presidential Activists in 1980." American Journal of Political Science28: 361-78.
43.
Sullivan, John L.1973. "Political Correlates of Social, Economic, and Religious Diversity in the American States." Journal of Politics35: 70-84.
44.
Tufte, Edward R.1974. Data Analysis for Politics and Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
45.
Ware, Alan.1979. " 'Divisive' Primaries: The Important Questions" British Journal of Political Science. 93: 381-84.
