Little empirical research has been done on the trial process in domestic violence-related cases. This study represents the first in-depth analysis of this trial process, focusing specifically on the defense themes and strategies used in domestic violence felong trials to challenge the credibility of the prosecution's case. Many of the strategies used by the defense manipulate common myths and misperceptions about the dynamics of domestic abuse. Implications for juror decision making and the use of expert witnesses in these trials are discussed. These defense tactics may also serve as a secondary victimization of abused women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bennett, L. , Goodman, L., & Dutton, M. A. (1999). Systematic obstacles to the criminal prosecution of a battering partner: A victim perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 761-772.
2.
Bocchino, A. J. , & Sonenshein, D. A. (1997). A practical guide to federal evidence: Objections, responses, rules, and practice commentary (4th ed.). South Bend, IN: National Institute for Trial Advocacy.
3.
Cahn, N. R. , & Lerman, L. G. (1991). Prosecuting woman abuse. In M. Steinman (Ed.), Woman battering: Policy responses (pp. 95-112). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
4.
Charmaz, K. (1990). “Discovering” chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science and Medicine, 30, 1161-1172.
5.
Cretney, A. , & Davis, G. (1997). Prosecuting domestic assault: Victims failing courts or courts failing victims. Howard Journal, 36, 146-157.
6.
Davis, R. C. (1983). Victim/witness noncooperation: A second look at a persistent phenomenon. Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 287-299.
7.
Davis, R. C. , Lurigio, A. J., & Skogan, W. G. (1997). Victims of crime (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Dodge, M. , & Greene, E. (1991). Juror and expert conceptions of battered women. Violence and Victims, 6, 271-282.
9.
Dressler, J. (1995). Understanding criminal law (2nd ed.). New York: Matthew Bender.
10.
Dutton, D. G. (1995). The domestic assault of women: Psychological and criminal justice perspectives. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
11.
Ellis, J. W. (1984). Prosecutorial discretion to charge in cases of spousal assault: A dialogue. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 56-102.
12.
Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Ewing, C. P. , & Aubrey, M. (1987). Battered women and public opinion: Some realities about the myths. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 257-264.
14.
Ferraro, K. J. , & Boychuk, T. (1992). The court's response to interpersonal violence: A comparison of intimate and nonintimate assault. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response (pp. 209-225). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
15.
Ford, D. A. (1991). Prosecution as a victim power resource: A note on empowering women in violent conjugal relationships. Law and Society Review, 25, 313-314.
16.
Ford, D. A. , & Regoli, M. J. (1992). The preventative impacts of policies for prosecuting wife batterers. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response (pp. 181-208). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
17.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
18.
Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
19.
Goode, S. , & Wellborn, O. G. (1997). Courtroom evidence handbook. St. Paul, MN: West.
20.
Greene, E. , Raitz, A., & Lindblad, H. (1989). Jurors' knowledge of battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 4, 105-125.
21.
Hartley, C. C. , & Ryan, R. (1998). Prosecution strategies in domestic violence: Anticipating and meeting defense claims (Final report, Grant Number 95-WT-NX-0003). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
22.
Healey, K. , Smith, C., & O'Sullivan, C. (1998). Batterer intervention: Program approaches and criminal justice strategies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
23.
Kirkwood, C. (1993). Leaving abusive partners. London: Sage.
24.
Konradi, A. (1996). Understanding rape survivors' preparations for court: Accounting for the influence of legal knowledge, cultural stereotypes, personal efficacy, and prosecutor contact. Violence Against Women, 2, 25-62.
25.
LaFave, W. R. , & Israel, J. H. (1992). Criminal procedure (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
26.
Langan, P. A. , & Innes, C. A. (1986). Preventing domestic violence against women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
27.
Lehrman, F. L. (1996). Domestic violence practice and procedure. Deerfield, IL: Clark Boardman Callaghan.
28.
Madigan, L. , & Gamble, N. C. (1991). The second rape: Society's continued betrayal of the victim. New York: Lexington Books.
29.
Marcus, M. D. (1989). Trial preparation for prosecutors. New York: Wiley Law Publications.
30.
Martin, M. E. (1994). Mandatory arrest for domestic violence: The courts' response. Criminal Justice Review, 19, 212-227.
31.
McGuire, L. A. (1998). Prosecution of domestic violence in Iowa: A prosecution manual (3rd ed.). Des Moines: Iowa Prosecuting Attorneys Training Coordinator.
32.
McLeod, M. (1983). Victim noncooperation in the prosecution of domestic assault. Criminology, 21, 395-416.
33.
Murphy, S. (1992). Assisting the jury in understanding victimization: Expert psychological testimony on battered woman syndrome and rape trauma syndrome. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 25, 277-312.
34.
Park, R. C. , Leonard, D. D., & Goldberg, S. H. (1998). Evidence law. St. Paul, MN: West.
35.
Pennington, N. , & Hastie, R. (1981). Juror decision-making models: The generalization gap. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 246-287.
36.
Pennington, N. , & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242-258.
37.
Rebovich, D. J. (1996). Prosecution response to domestic violence: Results of a survey of large jurisdictions. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 176-191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Reutlinger, M. (1996). Evidence: Essential terms and concepts. New York: Aspen Law & Business.
39.
Schafran, L. H. (1995). Credibility in the courts: Why is there a gender gap?Judges Journal, 34, 5-9, 40-42.
40.
Scheppele, K. L. (1992). Just the facts, ma'am: Sexualized violence, evidentiary habits, and the revision of truth. New York Law School Review, 37, 123-172.
41.
Sonkin, D. J. , & Fazio, W. (1987). Domestic violence expert testimony in the prosecution of male batterers. In D. J. Sonkin (Ed.), Domestic violence on trial: Psychological and legal dimensions of family violence (pp. 218-236). New York: Springer.
42.
Spohn, C. , & Horney, J. (1992). Rape law reform: A grassroots revolution and its impact. New York: Plenum.
43.
Stanko, E. A. (1982). Would you believe this woman? Prosecutorial screening for “credible” witnesses and a problem of justice. In N. H. Rafter & E. A. Stanko (Eds.), Judge, lawyer, victim, thief: Women, gender roles, and criminal justice (pp. 63-82). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
44.
Walker, L. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.
45.
Weeg, J. P. (1996). Iowa charging manual (4th ed.). Des Moines: Iowa Prosecuting Attorneys Training Coordinator.
