This article will highlight strategies to promote interactive distance education activities through special education teacher preparation programs. We begin the discussion by addressing the need for qualified special education teachers in rural areas. We then introduce the potential of distance education via online instruction as a platform for preparing special education teachers to alleviate the current shortages experienced by rural communities. Effective interactive distance education strategies are introduced as a means to improve the quality of distance education preservice teacher preparation programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-Jarf,R. S. (2004). The effects of web-based learning on struggling EFL college writers.Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 49-57.
2.
Archibald,S. (2006). Narrowing in on educational resources that do affect student achievement.Peabody Journal of Education 81(4), 23-42.
3.
Barab,S.A., Merrill,H, Thomas,M.K. (2001). Online learning: from information dissemination to fostering collaboration.Journal of Interactive Learning Research, (12)1, 105-143.
4.
Brookfield,S., & Preskill,S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
5.
Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary. (2007). Retrieved January 25, 2007, from http://Cambridge.org.
6.
Colbert,R. (2005). New technologies for the education market smash barriers in distance learning.Distance Learning, 2(4), 7-8.
7.
Fitcher,D. (2005). The many forms of e-collaboration: Blogs, wikis, portals, groupware, discussion boards, and instant messaging.Online, 29(4), 48-51.
8.
Egido,C. (1990). Teleconferencing as a technology to support cooperative work: Its possibilities and limitations. In GalegherJ., KrautR. E., & EgidoC. (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 351–371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Jenkins,T.M. (1982). What it takes to teleconference successfully.Administrative Management, 43 (10), 28–44.
LaPointe,D.K. & Gunawardena,C. N. (2004). Developing, testing, and refining of a model to understand the relationship between peer interaction and learning outcomes in computer-mediated conferencing.Distance Education, 25(1), 83-107.
12.
Lehmann,K.J. (2004). How to be a great online teacher.Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
13.
Magnuson,C. (2005). Experiential learning and the discussion board: A strategy, a rubric, and management techniques.Distance Learning, 2(2), 15-21.
14.
McLeskey,J, Tyler,N., Flippin,S. (2004). The supply of and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the chronic shortage of special education teachers.Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 5-21.
15.
Moore,M.G. (1989). Three types of interaction.The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
16.
Moore,M.G., & Kearsley,G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
17.
Rogelberg,S.G., O'Connor,M.S., & Sederburg,M. (2002). Using the stepladder technique to facilitate the performance of audioconferencing.Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 994-1000.
18.
Savenye,W.C. (2005). Improving online courses: What is interaction and why use it?Distance Learning, 2(6), 22-29.
19.
SPeNSE. (2002). Recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers (SPeNSE summary sheet). Retrieved January 25, 2007 from http://www.spense.org.
Zha,S., Kelly,P., Park,M.K., & Fitzgerald,G. (2006). An investigation of communicative competence of ESL students using electronic discussion boards.Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 349-368.
