By using the Global Fund as a case example, we aim to critically evaluate the evidence generated from 2002 to 2009 for potential negative health system effects of Global Health Initiatives (GHI).
Design
Systematic review of research literature.
Setting
Developing Countries.
Participants
All interventions potentially affecting health systems that were funded by the Global Fund.
Main outcome measures
Negative health system effects of Global Fund investments as reported by study authors.
Results
We identified 24 studies commenting on adverse effects on health systems arising from Global Fund investments. Sixteen were quantitative studies, six were qualitative and two used both quantitative and qualitative methods, but none explicitly stated that the studies were originally designed to capture or to assess health system effects (positive or negative). Only seemingly anecdotal evidence or authors’ perceptions/interpretations of circumstances could be extracted from the included studies.
Conclusions
This study shows that much of the currently available evidence generated between 2002 and 2009 on GHIs potential negative health system effects is not of the quality expected or needed to best serve the academic or broader community. The majority of the reviewed research did not fulfil the requirements of rigorous scientific evidence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
UngerJP, De PaepeP, GreenA.A code of best practice for disease control programmes to avoid damaging health care services in developing countries.Int J Health Plann Manage2003; 18 (Suppl. 1): S27–39.
2.
MillsA.Mass campaigns versus general health services: what have we learnt in 40 years about vertical versus horizontal approaches?Bull World Health Organ2005; 83: 315–16.
3.
UplekarM, RaviglioneMC.The ‘vertical-horizontal’ debates: time for the pendulum to rest (in peace)?Bull World Health Organ2007; 85: 413–17.
4.
ShiffmanJ.Has donor prioritization of HIV/AIDS displaced aid for other health issues?Health Policy Plan2008; 23: 95–100.
5.
BiesmaRG, BurghaR, HarmerA.The effects of global health initiatives on country health systems: a review of the evidence from HIV/AIDS control.Health Policy Plan2009; 24: 239–52.
6.
BuseK, HarmerAM.Seven habits of highly effective global public-private health partnerships: practise and potential.Soc Sci Med2007; 64: 259–71.
7.
HanefeldJ, MushekeM.What impact do Global Health Initiatives have on human resources for antiretroviral treatment roll-out? A qualitative policy analysis of implementation processes in Zambia.Hum Resour Health2009; 7: 8. DOI:10.1186/1478-4491-7-8
8.
ReichMR, TakemiK.G8 and strengthening of health systems: follow-up to the Toyako summit.Lancet2009; 373: 508–15.
9.
SambB, EvansT, AtunR.World Health Organization maximising positive synergies collaborative group: an assessment of interactions between global health initiatives and country health systems.Lancet2009; 373: 2137–69.
10.
YuD, SouteyrandY, BandaMA, KaufmanJ, PerriensJH.Investment in HIV/AIDS programs: does it help strengthen health systems in developing countries?Global Health2008; 4: 8. DOI:10.1186/1744-8603-4-8
11.
BrughaR, DonoghueM, StarlingM.The Global Fund: managing great expectations.Lancet2004; 364: 95–100.
12.
FeachemR, SabotO.The Global Fund 2001-2006: a review of the evidence.Glob Public Health2007; 2: 325–41.
13.
HaffertyFW.Physician oversupply as a socially constructed reality.J Health Soc Behav1986; 27: 358–69.
14.
MosseD.Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice (Anthropology, Culture and Society).London: Pluto Press, 2004
15.
WHO: Everybody's Business: Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes: WHO's Framework for Action. World Health Organization, Geneva2007
CASP, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme:Making Sense of Evidence. 10 Questions to Help You Make Sense of Qualitative Research. Public Health Resources Unit2006. See http://www.phru.nhs.uk/Doc_Links/S.Reviews%20Appraisal%20Tool.pdf (last accessed 13 August 2012)
MaysN, PopeC, PopayJ.Systematically reviewing qualitative and qualtitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field.J Health Ser Res Policy2005; 10: 6–20.
23.
JahnA, FloydS, CrampinAC.Population-level effect of HIVon adult mortality and early evidence of reversal after introduction of antiretroviral therapy in Malawi.Lancet2008; 371: 1603–11.
24.
BegovacJ, GedikeK, LukasD, LepejSZ.Late presentation to care for HIV infection in Croatia and the effect of interventions during the Croatian Global Fund project.AIDS Behav2008; 12 (Suppl. 4): S48–53.
25.
CeesaySJ, Casals-PascualC, ErskineJ.Changes in malaria indices between 1999 and 2007 in the Gambia: a retrospective analysis.Lancet2008; 372: 1545–54.
26.
SevereP, LegerP, CharlesM.Antiretroviral therapy in a thousand patients with AIDS in Haiti.N Engl J Med2005; 353: 2325–34.
27.
GeorgeE, NoelF, BoisG.Antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1-infected children in Haiti.J Infect Dis2007; 195: 1411–8.
28.
FernandoSD, AbeyasingheRR, GalappaththyGN, GunawardenaN, RajapakseLC.Community factors affecting long-lasting impregnated mosquito net use for malaria control in Sri Lanka.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg2008; 102: 1081–88.
29.
GalarragaO, BertozziSM.Stakeholders’ opinions and expectations of the Global Fund and their potential economic implications.AIDS2008; 22 (Suppl. 1): S7–15.
30.
LuC, MichaudC, KhanK, MurrayC.Absorptive capacity and disbursements by the Global Fund to fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria: analysis of grant implementation.Lancet2006; 368: 483–8.
31.
MulliganJA, YukichJ, HansonK.Costs and effects of the Tanzanian national voucher scheme for insecticide-treated nets.Malar J2008; 7: 32. DOI:10.1186/1475-2875-7-32
32.
PlamondonKM, HansonL, LabonteR, AbonyiS.The Global Fund and tuberculosis in Nicaragua: building sustainable capacity?Can J Public Health2008; 99: 355–8.
33.
NtataPR.Equity in access to ARV drugs in Malawi.SAHARA J2007; 4: 564–74.
34.
SwidlerA, WatkinsSC.‘Teach a man to fish’: the sustainability doctrine and its social consequences.World Dev2009; 37: 1182–96.
35.
AminAA, ZurovacD, KangwanaBB.The challenges of changing national malaria drug policy to artemisinin-based combinations in Kenya.Malar J2007; 6: 72. DOI:10.1186/1475-2875-6-72
36.
HillPS, Tan EangM.Resistance and renewal: health sector reform and Cambodia's national tuberculosis programme.Bull World Health Organ2007; 85: 631–6.
37.
CassimonD, RenardR, VerbekeK.Assessing debt-to-health swaps: a case study on the Global Fund Debt2Health Conversion Scheme.Trop Med Int Health2008; 13: 1188–95.
38.
MukherjeeJS, EustacheFE.Community health workers as a cornerstone for integrating HIV and primary healthcare.AIDS Care2007; 19 (Suppl. 1): S73–82.
39.
MathewTA, YanovSA, MazitovR.Integration of alcohol use disorders identification and management in the tuberculosis programme in Tomsk Oblast, Russia.Eur J Public Health2009; 19: 16–8.
40.
Low-BeerD, AfkhamiH, KomatsuR.Making performance-based funding work for health.PLoS Med2007; 4: e219. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040219
41.
KomatsuR, Low-BeerD, SchwartlanderB.Global Fund-supported programmes’ contribution to international targets and the Millennium Development Goals: an initial analysis.Bull World Health Organ2007; 85: 805–11.
42.
LibambaE, MakombeSD, HarriesAD.Malawi's contribution to “3 by 5”: achievements and challenges.Bull World Health Organ2007; 85: 156–60.
43.
AnimutA, Gebre-MichaelT, MedhinG.Assessment of distribution, knowledge and utilization of insecticide treated nets in selected malaria prone areas of Ethiopia.Ethiop J Health Dev2008; 22: 268–74.
44.
Van OosterhoutJJ, KumwendaJK, HartungT, MhangoB, ZijlstraEE.Can the initial success of the Malawi ART scale-up programme be sustained? The example of Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre.AIDS Care2007; 19: 1241–6.
45.
VasanA, HoosD, MukherjeeJS.The pricing and procurement of antiretroviral drugs: an observational study of data from the Global Fund.Bull World Health Organ2006; 84: 393–8.
46.
SoltanV, HenryAK, CruduV, ZatusevskiI.Increasing tuberculosis case detection: lessons from the Republic of Moldova.Bull World Health Organ2008; 86: 71–6.
47.
DesaiM, RudgeJW, AdisasmitoW.Critical interactions between Global Fund-supported programmes and health systems: a case study in Indonesia.Health Policy and Planning2010; 25: i43–7. doi:10.1093/heapol/czq057
48.
Mounier-JackS, RudgeJW, PhetsouvanhR.Critical interactions between Global Fund-supported programmes and health systems: a case study in Lao People's Democratic Republic.Health Policy and Planning2010; 25: i37–42. doi:10.1093/heapol/czq056
49.
RudgeJW, PhuanakoononS, NemaKH.Critical interactions between Global Fund-supported programmes and health systems: a case study in Papua New Guinea.Health Policy and Planning2010; 25: i48–52. doi:10.1093/heapol/czq058
50.
HanvoravongchaiP, WarakaminB, CokerR.Critical interactions between Global Fund-supported programmes and health systems: a case study in Thailand.Health Policy and Planning2010; 25: i53–7. doi:10.1093/heapol/czq059
51.
TrägårdA, Bahadur ShresthaI.System-wide effects of Global Fund investments in Nepal.Health Policy and Planning2010; 25: i58–62. doi:10.1093/heapol/czq061
52.
BriggsCJ, GarnerP.Strategies for integrating primary health services in middle- and low-income countries at the point of delivery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2006; 2: CD003318. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003318.pub2
53.
LewinS, LavisJN, OxmanAD.Supporting the delivery of cost-effective interventions in primary healthcare systems in low-income and middle-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.Lancet2008; 372: 928–39.
54.
Global Fund: Final Report, Global Fund five-year evaluation: Study area 3. The Impact of Collective Efforts on the Reduction of the Disease Burden of AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria.Geneva, May 2009. See http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/terg/evaluations/5year/ (last accessed 13 August 2012)
