When single-subject design is the method used to evaluate clinical work, the same person simultaneously conducts counseling and evaluation. The author describes situations in which the roles of clinician and evaluator are compatible as well as circumstances in which difficulties in exercising the demands of both roles occur. The various phases of the treatment/evaluation process are followed, and suggestions are given regarding ways to resolve differences between the clinician's and the evaluator's perspectives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ApplegateJ. S. (1991). Measurement as treatment: Are subjective self-ratings reactive?Journal of Social Service Research, 14(3-4), 45–62.
2.
ApplegateJ. S. (1992). The impact of subjective measures on nonbehavioral practice research: Outcome vs. process. Families in Society, 73, 100–108.
3.
BenbenishtyR. (1988). Assessment of task-centered interventions with families in Israel. Journal of Social Service Research, 11(4), 19–43.
4.
BerlinS. B. (1983). Single-case evaluation. Another version. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 19(1), 3–11.
5.
BloomM., FischerJ., & OrmeJ. G. (1995). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
BlytheB. J., & BriarS. (1985). Developing empirically based models of practice. Social Work, 30, 483–488.
7.
BriarS., & BlytheB. J. (1985). Agency support for evaluating the outcomes of social work services. Administration in Social Work, 9(2), 25–36.
8.
CasementP. (1985). On learning from the patient.London, England: Tavistock Publications.
9.
CookT. D., & CampbellD. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field setting.Chicago: Rand McNally.
10.
CooperM. (1990). Treatment of a client with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 26(2), 26–32.
DeanR. G., & ReinherzH. (1986). Psychodynamic practice and single-system designs: The odd couple. Journal of Social Work Education, 22(2), 71–81.
13.
DoueckH. J., & BondanzaA. B. (1990). Training social work staff to evaluate practice. A pre/post/then comparison. Administration in Social Work, 14(1), 119–133.
14.
FischR., WeaklandJ. H., & SegalL. (1986). The tactics of change: Doing therapy briefly.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
FisherS. G. (1980). The use of time limits in brief psychotherapy: A comparison of six-sessions, twelve-sessions, and unlimited treatment with families. Family Process, 19, 377–392.
16.
GaborP. (1989). Increasing accountability in child care practice through the use of single case evaluation. Child and Youth Care Quarterly, 18, 93–109.
17.
GingerichW. J. (1983). Significant testing in single-case research. In RosenblattA., & WaldfogelD. (Eds.), Handbook of clinical social work (pp. 694–720). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
GingerichW. J. (1990). Rethinking single-case evaluation. In Videka-ShermanL., & ReidW. (Eds.), Advances in clinical social work research (pp. 11–24). Silver Spring, MD: NASW Press.
19.
HayesS. C. (1981). Single case experimental designs and empirical practice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 193–211.
20.
HudsonW. W. (1982). The clinical measurement package: A field manual.Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
21.
KagleJ. D. (1982, spring). Using single-case measures in practice decisions: Systemic documentation or distortion?Arete, 7, 1–9.
22.
KagleJ. D., & CowgerC. D. (1984). Blaming the client: Implicit agenda in practice research?Social Work, 29, 347–351.
23.
LevyR. L., & OlsonD. G. (1979). The single-case methodology in clinical practice: An overview. Journal of Social Service Research, 3, 25–49.
24.
McMullinR. E. (1986). Handbook of cognitive therapy techniques.New York: W. W. Norton.
25.
MutschlerE. (1979). Using single-case evaluation procedures in a family and children's service agency. Journal of Social Service Research, 3(1), 115–134.
26.
NuehringE. M., & PasconeA. B. (1986). Single-case evaluation: A tool for quality assurance. Social Work, 31, 359–365.
27.
PenkaE. P., & KirkS. A. (1991). Practitioner involvement in clinical evaluation. Social Work, 36, 513–518.
28.
PinkstonE. M., BuddK. S., & BaerD. M. (1989). Evaluation of modeling as a parent training procedure. In ThyerB. A. (Ed.), Behavioral family therapy (pp. 55–77). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
29.
ProctorE. K. (1990). Evaluating clinical practice: Issues of purpose and design. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 26(2), 32–40.
30.
RabinC. (1981). The single-case design in family therapy evaluation research. Family Process, 20, 351–363.
31.
RicheyC. A., BlytheB. J., & BerlinS. A. (1987). Do social workers evaluate practice?Social Work Research and Abstracts, 23(2), 14–20
32.
RobinsonE. A. R., BronsonD. E., & BlytheB. J. (1988). An analysis of the implementation for single-case evaluation by practitioners. Social Service Review, 62, 285–301.
33.
RosenA. (1993). Systemic planned practice. Social Service Review, 67, 84–100.
34.
RubinA., & KnoxK. (1996). Data analysis problems in single-case evaluation: Issues for research on social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 6, 40–65.
35.
RuckdeschelR. A., & FerrisB. E. (1981). Assessing practice: A critical look at the single-case design. Social Casework, 62, 413–419.
36.
Slonim-NevoV., & VoslerN. R. (1991). The use of single-system design with systemic brief problem-solving therapy. Families in Society, 72, 38–44.
37.
ThomasE. J. (1978). Research and service in single-case experimentation: Conflicts and choices. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 14(4), 20–31.
38.
ThomasE. J. (1983). Problems and issues in single-case experiments. In RosenblattA., & WaldfogelD. (Eds.), Handbook of clinical social work (pp. 603–622). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
TripodiT. (1996). A primer on single-subject design for clinical social workers.Washington, DC: NASW Press.
