Visual art is a complex stimulus. Drawing on extant theory that the interplay of affect and cognition evoked by a stimulus drives evaluations, we develop a generalizable model for the perception and evaluation of visual art. In three stages, we develop scaled measurements for the affective and cognitive components involved in the perception of visual art and present a structural equation model that integrates these components in art evaluation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndradeE. B., & CohenJ. B. (2007). On the consumption of negative feelings. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 283–300.
2.
ArnheimR. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3.
BaltissenR. D., & OstermannB.-M. (1998). Are the dimensions underlying aesthetic and affective judgment the same?Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16(2), 97–113.
4.
BerkowitzL. (1993). Towards a general theory of anger and emotional aggression: Implications of the Cognitive-Neoassociationistic Perspective for the analysis of anger and other emotions. In WyerR. S. & SrullT. K. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 6, pp. 1–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
BerlyneD. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
6.
BerlyneD. E. (Ed.). (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
7.
BezruczkoN., & SchroederD. H. (1994). Differences in visual preferences and cognitive aptitudes of professional artists and nonartists. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 12(1), 19–39.
8.
BlessH.CloreG. L.SchwarzN.GolisanoV.RabeC., & WolkM. (1996). Mood and the use of scripts: Does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 665–679.
9.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
10.
BoselieF. (1991). Against prototypicality as a central concept in aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 65–73.
11.
BourdieuP., & DarbelA. (1997). The love of art: European art museums and their public. Oxford: Blackwell.
12.
CohenJ. S., & AreniC. S. (1991). Affect and consumer behavior. In RobertsonT. S. & KassarjianH. H. (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 188–240). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
13.
CupchikG. C. (1988). The legacy of Daniel E. Berlyne. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 6, 171–186.
14.
CupchikG. C., & GebotysR. J. (1990). Interest and pleasure as dimensions of aesthetic response. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8(1), 1–14.
15.
DamasioA. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Penguin.
16.
DeweyJ. (1989). Having an experience. In BoydstonJ. A. (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
17.
DuttonD. (2002). Aesthetic universals. In GautB. & LopesD. M. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to aesthetics. London: Routledge.
18.
EkmanP. (1999). Basic emotions. In DalgleishT. P. (Ed.), Handbook of cognition and emotion. Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
19.
FechnerG. T. (1871). Zur Experimentalen Aesthetik.Leipzig: Hirzel.
20.
ForgasJ. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66.
21.
FunchB. S. (1997). The psychology of art appreciation. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
22.
HagtvedtH., & PatrickV. (2008). Art infusion: The influence of visual art on the perception and evaluation of consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research, forthcoming.
23.
HauserA. (1999). The social history of art. London: Routledge.
24.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
25.
KozbeltA. (2004). Originality and technical skill as components of artistic quality. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(2), 157–170.
26.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
LeDouxJ. E. (1995). In search of an emotional system in the brain: Leaping from fear to emotion and consciousness. In GazzanigaM. S. (Ed.), The cognitive neuroscience (pp. 1049–1061). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
LeDouxJ. E. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster.
29.
LippsT. (1906). Ästhetik: Psychologie des Schönen und der Kunst.Hamburg: Leopold Voss.
30.
MarshH. W.BallaJ. R., & McDonaldR. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391–410.
31.
MartindaleC.MooreK., & BorkumJ. (1990). Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne's Psychobiological Model. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 53–80.
32.
MehrabianA., & RussellJ. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
NorthA. C., & HargreavesD. J. (2000). Collative variables versus prototypicality. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 18, 13–17.
34.
OatleyK., & DuncanE. (1992). Episodes of emotion in daily life. In StrongmanK. T. (Ed.), International review of studies on emotion (Vol. 2, pp. 249–293). Chichester: Wiley.
35.
PhamM. T.CohenJ. B.PracejusJ. W., & HughesG. D. (2001). Affect monitoring and the primacy offeelings in judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 167–188.
36.
PickfordR. W. (1972). Psychology and visual aesthetics. London: Hutchinson Educational.
37.
ReberR.SchwartzN., & WinkielmanP. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382.
38.
ReisenzeinR. (1983). The Schacter theory of emotion: Two decades later. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 239–264.
39.
RussellJ. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.
40.
ShivB., & FedorikhinA. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 278–292.
41.
ShrumW. M. (1996). Fringe and fortune: The role of critics in high and popular art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
SilviaP. J. (2005a). Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of General Psychology, 9(4), 342–357.
43.
SilviaP. J. (2005b). Cognitive appraisals and interest in visual art: Exploring an Appraisal Theory of Aesthetic Emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 119–133.
44.
SilviaP. J. (2006). Artistic training and interest in visual art: Applying the Appraisal Model of Aesthetic Emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 24(2), 139–161.
45.
SonbonmatsuD. M., & KardesF. R. (1988). The effects of physiological arousal on information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 379–385.
46.
TanE. S. (2000). Emotion, art and the humanities. In LewisM. & Haviland-JonesJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 116–136). New York: Guilford Press.
47.
TanseyR. G., & KleinerF. S. (1996). Gardner's art through the ages. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
48.
VandenbergR. J., & ScarpelloV. (1990). The Matching Model: An examination of the processes underlying realistic job previews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 60–67.
49.
WartenbergT. E. (2006). The nature of art: An anthology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
50.
WyerR. S.CloreG. L., & IsbellL. M. (1999). Affect and information processing. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 1–77). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
51.
ZajoncR. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.
