Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present study examined students' reactions to a psychological experiment involving deception and forewarning. A 2 × 2 factorial design consisted of two levels of deception (deception present versus deception absent) and two levels of forewarning (presence of deception suggested versus presence of deception absent). 48 subjects participated in a two-person Prisoner's Dilemma cooperation game, 12 in each experimental condition. The present study showed (a) deceived subjects performed more competitively than did nondeceived subjects, (b) forewarned subjects recalled the forewarning, and (c) only deceived subjects rated the experiment as worthless, were annoyed with the experiment, and would not recommend the experiment to a friend. It was concluded that it is possible to inform subjects that deceptions are sometimes used in experiments without necessarily eliminating the possibility that the subjects can subsequently be deceived.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baumrind

Nature and definition of informed consent in research involving deception. Paper prepared for the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, U.S. Department of H.E.W., Bethesda, MD, 1976, 2, (OS) 78–0014.

Berkowitz

Some complexities and uncertainties regarding the ethicality of deception in research with human subjects. Paper prepared for the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, U.S. Department of H.E.W., Bethesda, MD, 1976, 1, (OS) 78–0013.

Dalglish

Protecting human subjects in social and behavioral research: ethics, law, and the DHEW rules: a critique. Berkeley: Center for Research in Management Science, 1976.

Diener

Crandall

Ethics in social and behavioral research. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1978.

Gallo

Smith

Mumford

Effects of deceiving subjects upon experimental results. Journal of Social Psychology, 1973, 89, 99–107.

Hollander

Effects of forewarning factors on pre- and post-communication attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 272–278.

Holmes

Bennett

Experiments to answer questions raised by the use of deception in psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 358–367.

Holt

Watt

Immediate and delayed effects of distraction and fore warning of persuasive intent. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1974, 1, 127–129.

Katz

Experimentation with human beings—values in conflict. Connecticut Medical Journal, 1975, 39, 375–376.

10.

Kelman

Human use of human subjects: the problem of deception in social psychology experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67, 1–11.

11.

Kiesler

Role of forewarning in persuasive communication. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1964, 68, 547–549.

12.

London

Experiments on humans: where to draw the line?

Psychology Today, 1977, 11 (6), 22–23.

13.

Milgram

Obedience to authority: an experimental view. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.

14.

Miller

(Ed.) The social psychology of psychological research. New York: Free Press, 1972.

15.

Papageorgis

Warning and persuasion. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 78, 271–282.

16.

Petty

Cacioppo

Forewarning, cognitive responding and resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 645–655.

17.

Reynolds

Ethical dilemmas and social science research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979.

18.

West

Gunn

Some issue of ethics and social psychology. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 30–38.

Follow-up Analysis of Use of Forewarning and Deception in Psychological Experiments

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References