AngJ. (2007) Discrete choice modeling with PROC MDC.SESUG Proceedings. Available at http://www.sesug.org.
2.
DaganzoC. (1979) Multinomial Probit: The Theory and its Application to Demand Forecasting.New York: Academic Press.
3.
DenstadliJ.M., & LinesR. (2007) Conjoint respondents as adaptive decision makers.International Journal of Market Research, 49, 1, pp. 117–132.
4.
HaaijerR., KamakuraW., & WedelM. (2001) The ‘no-choice’ alternative to conjoint choice experiments.International Journal of Market Research, 43, 1, pp. 93–106.
5.
HoffmanS.D., & DuncanG.J. (1988) Multinomial and conditional logit discrete-choice models in demography.Demography, 25, 3, pp. 415–427.
6.
LouviereJ.J., & WoodworthG. (1983) Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data.Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 4, pp. 350–367.
McFaddenD. (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: ZarembkaP. (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics.New York: Academic Press, pp. 105–142.
9.
MontgomeryM. (2002) A nested logit model of the choice of a graduate business school.Economics of Education Review, 21, 5, pp. 471–480.
10.
SapedeC., & GirodI. (2002) Willingness of adults in Europe to pay for a new vaccine: the application of discrete choice-based conjoint analysis.International Journal of Market Research, 44, 4, pp. 463–491.