Attending to immigrants’ social integration is a complex challenge for adult educators in ordinary times, and the complexity has significantly increased with the COVID–19 pandemic. This exploratory paper begins by outlining four aspects of social integration: forming social networks, developing a sense of belonging, linking social integration to the workplace, and language learning. Working within an intersectionality framework that foregrounds migrants’ experiences of discrimination, this paper reveals ways that migrants have experienced increased discrimination and inequality in their social integration since the COVID–19 pandemic began. Recommendations are made regarding tending to migrants’ physical and psychosocial needs, countering discriminatory attitudes with empathy, addressing the digital divide, and using intersectionality to empirically examine migrant experiences.
AgerA., & StrangA. (2008). Understanding integration: A conceptual framework. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(2), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen016
2.
Balanzá–MartínezV., Atienza–CarbonellB., KapczinskiF., & Brandini De BoniR. (2020). Lifestyle behaviours during the COVID–19 – time to connect. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 141, 399–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13177
3.
BanerjeeD., & RaiM. (2020). Social isolation in COVID–19: The impact of loneliness. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 66(6), 525–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020922269
4.
BeaccoJ.–C., KrummH.–J., & LittleD. (2017). Introduction (English version). In BeaccoJ.–C., KrummH.–J., LittleD., & ThalgottP. (Eds.), The linguistic integration of adult migrants: Some lessons from research (L'intégration linguistique des migrants adultes: Les enseignements de la recherche) (pp. 1–4). De Gruyter.
5.
BednarzF. (2017). Professional and social integration of migrants and language learning: Convergences and challenges at the European level. In BeaccoJ.–C., KrummH.–J., LittleD., & ThalgottP. (Eds.), The linguistic integration of adult migrants: Some lessons from research (L'intégration linguistique des migrants adultes: Les enseignements de la recherche) (pp. 75–81). De Gruyter.
6.
Berg–WegerM., & MorleyJ. E. (2020). Loneliness and social isolation in older adults during the COVID–19 pandemic: Implications for gerontological social work. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 24(5), 456–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603–020–1366–8
7.
BlockD. (2018). The political economy of language education research (or the lack thereof): Nancy Fraser and the case of translanguaging. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 15(4), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2018.1466300
8.
BowlegL. (2008). When black + lesbian + woman ≠ black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199–008–9400–z
9.
BraddellA., & MillerL. (2017). Supporting migrants in low–paid, low–skilled employment in London to improve their English. In BeaccoJ.–C., KrummH.–J., LittleD., & ThalgottP. (Eds.), Settlement, integration and language learning: Possible synergies. A task–based, community–focused program from the region of Durham (Ontario, Canada) (pp. 309–314). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110477498–023
BürknerH.–J. (2011). Intersectionality: How gender studies might inspire the analysis of social inequality among migrants. Population, Space and Place, 18(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.664
12.
CholeraR., FalusiO. O., & LintonJ. M. (2020). Sheltering in place in a xenophobic climate: COVID–19 and children in immigrant families. Pediatrics, 146(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020–1094
13.
ChooH. Y., & FerreeM. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9558.2010.01370.x
14.
ChristensenA.–D. (2009). Belonging and unbelonging from an intersectional perspective. Gender, Technology and Development, 13(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/097185240901300102
15.
ChristensenA.–D., & JensenS. Q. (2012). Doing intersectional analysis: Methodological implications for qualitative research. Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 20(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2012.673505
16.
DavisK. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85. http://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364
FritzT., & DonatD. (2017). What migrant learners need. In BeaccoJ.–C., KrummH.–J., LittleD., & ThalgottP. (Eds.), The linguistic integration of adult migrants: Some lessons from research (L'intégration linguistique des migrants adultes: Les enseignements de la recherche) (pp. 163–168). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110477498–021
20.
GeeJ. P. (2004). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In RogersR. (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 19–50). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
GittellR., & VidalA. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Sage Publications.
JezakM., & CarrascoE. (2017). Integration trajectories of adult (im)migrations in minority and minoritized contexts: Ottawa and Barcelona. In BeaccoJ.–C., KrummH.–J., LittleD., & ThalgottP. (Eds.), The linguistic integration of adult migrants: Some lessons from research (L'intégration linguistique des migrants adultes: Les enseignements de la recherche) (pp. 97–103). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110477498–013
30.
JonesP., & KrzyzanowskiM. (2008). Identity, belonging and migration: Beyond constructing ‘others’. In DelantyG., JonesP., & WodakR. (Eds.), Identity, belonging and migration (pp. 38–53). Liverpool University Press.
LiP. (2003). Deconstructing Canada's discourse of immigrant integration. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 4(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134–003–1024–0
LiuJ., JurkovaS., & MoralesR. (2020, May 26). “We are all in this together,” but who is the “we”? Exploring the impacts of the pandemic on immigrants through an intersectional analysis. Pandemic Pedagogies [Webinar]: Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education. https://www.casae–aceea.ca/webinars/
36.
Losada–BaltarA., Jiménez–GonzaloL., Gallego–AlbertoL., del Sequeros Pedroso–ChaparroM., Fernandes–PiresJ., & Márquez–GonzálezM. (2020). “We are staying at home.” Associations of self–perceptions of aging, personal and family resources, and loneliness with psychological distress during the lockdown period of COVID–19. The Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, e10–e16. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa048
MukhopadhyayS., BoothA. L., CalkinsS. M., DoxtaderE. E., FineS. W., GardnerJ. M., GonzalezR. S., MirzaK. M., & JiangX. S. (2020). Leveraging technology for remote learning in the era of COVID–19 and social distancing: Tips and resources for pathology educators and trainees. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 144(9), 1027–1036. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2020–0201–ED
PeirceB. N. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587803
41.
PenninxR. (2005). Integration of migrants: Economic, social, cultural and political dimensions. In MacuraM., MacdonaldA. L. & HaugW. (Eds.), The new demographic regime: Population challenges and policy responses (pp. 137–151). United Nations.
42.
PutnamR. S. (1995). Bowling alone: Civic disengagement in America. Simon and Schuster.
43.
RamsettyA., & AdamsC. (2020). Impact of the digital divide in the age of COVID–19. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(7), 1147–1148. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa078
SwinneyK. (2017). Networks and super connectors. In BeaccoJ.–C., KrummH.–J., LittleD., & ThalgottP. (Eds.), The Linguistic Integration of Adult Migrants/L'intégration linguistique des migrants adultes (pp. 207–212). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110477498–028
47.
SzreterS. (2002). The state of social capital: Bringing back in power, politics, and history. Theory and Society, 31(5), 573–621.
48.
ThobaniS. (2007). Exalted subjects: Studies in the making of race and nation in Canada. University of Toronto Press.
49.
ToralesJ., O'HigginsM., Mauricio Castaldelli–MaiaJ., & VentriglioA. (2020). The outbreak of COVID–19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 66(4), 317–320. https://doi/org/10.1177/0020764020915212
50.
UsherK., BhullarN., & JacksonD. (2020). Life in the pandemic: Social isolation and mental health. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(15–16), 2756–2757. https://doi/org/10.1111/jocn15290
WodakR. (2008). ‘Us’ and ‘them’: Inclusion and exclusion – discrimination via discourse. In GerardD., WodakR., & JonesP. (Eds.), Identity, belonging and migration (pp. 54–77). University Liverpool Press.
