In light of current work toward the development of global standards for project management, this paper analyzes differences between a selection of various countries’ existing project management standards. The analysis is conducted using computational corpus linguistics techniques, resulting in the identification of similarities and differences between the standards of five countries.
Al-ArjaniA. H. (1995). Impact of cultural issues on the scheduling of housing maintenance in a Saudi Arabian urban project. International Journal of Project Management, 13(6), 373–382.
2.
AndersenE. S., DyrhaugQ. X., & JessenS.A. (2002). Evaluation of Chinese projects and comparison with Norwegian projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(8), 601–609.
3.
AshenF. (1978). Statistics for linguistics.Reading, MA: Newbury House.
4.
Association of Project Managers (APM). (1996). Body of knowledge: Version 3.High Wycombe, UK: Author.
5.
BettsM., & LansleyP. (1995). International Journal of Project Management: A review of the first ten years. International Journal of Project Management, 13(4), 207–217.
6.
BredilletC. (2003). Genesis and role of standards: theoretical foundations and socio-economical model for the construction and use of standards. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 463–470.
7.
BubshaitA., & SelenW. (1992). Project characteristics that influence the implementation of project management techniques: A survey. Project Management Journal, 23(2), 43–47.
8.
Business Services Training Australia. (2004). National competency standards for project management.Brisbane, Australia: Australian National Training Authority.
9.
ButterfieldJ., & PendegraftN. (1996). Cultural analysis in IS planning & management. Journal of Systems Management, 47(2), 14–17.
10.
ChanW. K. L., WongF. K. W., & ScottD. (1999). Managing construction projects in China—The transitional period in the millennium. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 257–263.
11.
CheungC. C., & ChuahK. B. (1999). Conflict management styles in Hong Kong industries. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 393–399.
12.
ClelandD. I., & KingW. R. (1968). Systems analysis and project management.New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
CrawfordL. (2001). Project management competence: The value of standards. Unpublished DBA thesis, Henley Management College, Brunel University.
14.
CrawfordL. (2004a, May). Towards a global framework for project management standards. In Proceedings of PMSA Conference (pp. 1–14). Johannesburg: PMSA.
15.
CrawfordL. (2004b). Global body of project management knowledge and standards. In PintoJ. & MorrisG. (Eds.), The Wiley guide to managing projects (pp. 1150–1196). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
16.
CrawfordL. (2004c). Professional associations and global initiatives. PintoIn J. & MorrisG. (Eds.), The Wiley guide to managing projects (pp. 1389–1402). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
17.
CrawfordL., & EnglandD. (2004). Mapping the links between project management and systems. Paper presented at the International Research Network on Organizing by Projects (IRNOP VI), Turku, Finland.
18.
CrawfordL., HobbsB., & TurnerR. (2002, July). Investigation of potential classification systems for projects. In SlevinD. P., ClelandD. I. & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), Project management research at the turn of the millennium: Proceedings of PMI Research Conference.Seattle, WA: PMI.
19.
CrawfordL., HobbsB., & TurnerR. (2005). Project categorization systems: Aligning capability with strategy for better results.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
20.
CrawfordL., & PannenbackerO. (Eds.). (1999). Towards a global body of project management knowledge. Retrieved March 28, 2000, from http://www.aipm.com/OLC/
21.
DvirD., LipovetskyS., ShenharA., & TishlerA. (1998). In search of project classification: A non-universal approach to project success factors. Research Policy, 27(9), 915–935.
22.
Engineering Advancement Association of Japan (ENAA). (2002). P2M: A guidebook of project & program management for enterprise innovation: Summary translation. Revision 1.Tokyo, Japan: Project Management Professionals Certification Centre.
23.
Engineering Construction Industry Training Board (ECITB). (2002).National occupational standards for project management: Pre-launch version.Kings Langley, UK: Author.
24.
FloricelS., & MillerR. (2001). Strategizing for anticipated risks and turbulence in large-scale engineering projects. International Journal of Project Management, 19(8), 445–455.
25.
GrayR. J. (2001). Organizational climate and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 19(2), 103–109.
26.
HartmanF., AshrafiR., & JergeasG. (1998). Project management in the live entertainment industry: What is different?International Journal of Project Management, 16(5), 269–281.
27.
HastingsC. (1995). Building the culture of organizational networking. International Journal of Project Management, 13(4), 259–263.
28.
HooleC., & du PlessisY. (2002). The development of a project management culture assessment framework. Proceedings of the PMI Research Conference (pp. 255–265).
29.
International Project Management Association (IPMA). (1999). ICB: IPMA competence baseline, Version 2. (CaupinG., KnopfelH., MorrisP., MotzelE. & PannenbackerO., Eds.). Frankfurt, Germany: Author.
30.
JEDEC. (2004). White paper: The vital role of standard-setting organizations and the necessity of good faith and fair play among participants. JEDEC 2004 Symposium: The future of standards setting, legal, marketplace and consumer implications. Retrieved November 1, 2004, from http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:9tJZftZJxO8J:standardsconference.org
31.
KendraK., & TaplinL. (2004). Project success: A cultural framework. Project Management Journal, 35(1), 30–45.
32.
KilgarriffA. (2001). Comparing corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 6(1), 97–133.
33.
KloppenborgT. J., & OpferW. A. (2000). Forty years of project management research: Trends, interpretations, and predictions. Proceedings of the PMI Research Conference (pp. 41–59).
34.
KrechmerK. (2004). Standardization and innovation policies in the information age. International Journal of IT Standards & Standardization Research, 2(2), 49–60.
35.
LennM. (1997). Introduction. In LennM. & CamposL. (Eds.), Globalization of the professions and the quality imperative: Professional accreditation, certification and licensure. Madison, WI: Magna Publications, Inc.
36.
LinB.-W., & BergD. (2001). Effects of cultural difference on technology transfer projects: An empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturing companies. International Journal of Project Management, 19(5), 287–293.
37.
LoosemoreM., & Al MuslmaniH. S. (1999). Construction project management in the Persian Gulf: Inter-cultural communication. International Journal of Project Management, 17(2), 95–100.
38.
MorrisP. W. G., PatelM. B., & WearneS. H. (2000). Research into revising the APM project management body of knowledge. International Journal of Project Management, 18(3), 155–164.
39.
MunnsA. K., AloquiliO., & RamsayB. (2000). Joint venture negotiation and managerial practices in the new countries of the former Soviet Union. International Journal of Project Management, 18(6), 403–413.
40.
MuriithiN., & CrawfordL. (2003). Approaches to project management in Africa: Implications for international development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 21(5), 309–319.
41.
Occupational Standards Council for Engineering (OSCEng). (1996). OSCEng Level 4. NVQ/SVQ in project controls.Farnborough, Hampshire, England: Author.
42.
Occupational Standards Council for Engineering (OSCEng). (1997). OSCEng Level 4 and 5. NVQ/SVQ in (generic) project management.Farnborough, Hampshire, England: Author.
43.
Office of Government Commerce (OGC). (2002). Successful delivery skills programme: Skills framework.Norwich, Norfolk, UK: The Stationary Office Books.
44.
Oxford University Computing Services. (2002). British national corpus. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Computing Services.
45.
PayneJ. H., & TurnerJ. R. (1999). Company-wide project management: The planning and control of programmes of projects of different type. International Journal of Project Management, 17(1), 55–59.
46.
PellsD. L. (1996). Introduction. In PennypackerJ. S. (Ed.), The global status of the project management profession(pp. ix-xii). Sylva, NC: PMI Communications.
47.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2000). A guide to the project management body of knowledge.Newtown Square, PA: Author.
48.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2002). Project manager competency development framework.Newtown Square, PA: Author.
49.
Project Management Standards Generating Body (PMSGB). (2002). South African qualifications authority project management competency standards: Levels 3 and 4. South Africa.Newtown Square PA: South African Qualifications Authority.
50.
Public Service Sector Education and Training Authority (PSETA). (2000). Project management competency standards.Melbourne, Australia: Mercury Printeam.
51.
RaysonP., & GarsideR. (2000). Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. In Proceedings of the workshop on comparing corpora, held in conjunction with the 38th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 1–6).
52.
SauerC., LiuL., & JohnstonK. (2001). Where project managers are kings. Project Management Journal, 32(4), 39–49.
53.
ScottM. (1997). PC analysis of key words—and key key words. System, 25(2), 233–245.
54.
ScottM. (2004). WordSmith Tools Version 4.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55.
ShenharA. (1996). Project management theory: The road to better practice. In Proceedings of the Project Management Institute 27th Annual Seminar/Symposium (pp. 704–709). Newtown Square, PA: PMI.
56.
ShenharA. (1998). From theory to practice: Toward a typology of project management styles. IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management, 25(1), 33–48.
57.
ShenharA., & WidemanR. (1996). Improving PM: Linking success criteria to project type. Southern Alberta Chapter, Project Management Institute, Symposium Creating Canadian Advantage through Project Management.Newtown Square, PA: PMI.
58.
ThemistocleousG., & WearneS. H. (2000). Project management topic coverage in journals. International Journal of Project Management, 18(1), 7–11.
59.
TurnerJ. R., & CochraneR. A. (1993). Goals-and-methods matrix: Coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them. International Journal of Project Management, 11(2), 93–101.
60.
UrliB., & UrliD. (2000). Project management in North America, stability of the concepts. Project Management Journal, 31(3), 33–43.
61.
van Wegberg, M. (2004). Standardization and competing consortia: The trade-off between speed and compatibility. International Journal of IT Standards & Standardization Research, 2(2), 18–33.
62.
WangX. (2001). Dimensions and current status of project management culture. Project Management Journal, 32(4), 4–17.
63.
YangM., ChuahK., TummalaV., & ChenE. (1997). Project management practices in Pudong, a new economic development area of Shanghai, China. International Journal of Project Management, 15(5), 313–319.
64.
YeoK. T. (1993). Systems thinking and project management—Time to reunite. International Journal of Project Management, 11(2), 111–117.
65.
YoukerR. (1999). The difference between different types of projects. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Project Management Institute Conference.Newtown Square, PA: PMI.
66.
ZobelA. M., & WearneS. H. (2000). Project management topic coverage in recent conferences. Project Management Journal, 31(2), 32–37.