Leadership, personality, and organizational factors were analyzed to measure their combined effect on virtual-based product development time and scope-quality performance. Over 1,000 team members were surveyed. MANCOVA was used to test if leadership, personality project, and/or organizational factors impacted performance. All realistic factors were included to detect leadership substitutes moderation, mediation, and prediction. Bias was reduced by not surveying leaders, by using reverse item coding, and by checking social desirability. Experimental control and common method variance were managed by including multilevel and multisource data. Performance was objectively computed from organizational data. The findings were that transactional leadership (not transformational) and some personality attributes (leader substitutes) were significant factors, increasing project scope quality and time performance.
AmabileT. M., HadleyC. N., & KramerS. J. (2002). Creativity under the gun. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 52–61.
3.
AronsonZ. H., ReillyR. R., & LynnG. S. (2006). The impact of leader personality on new product development teamwork and performance: The moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23, 221–247.
4.
AshwinW. J., & SanjayS. (2004). Customer knowledge development: Antecedents and impact on new product performance. Journal of Marketing, 68, 47–59.
5.
AvolioB., BassB., & JungD. I. (1995). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire: Technical report.Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
6.
AvolioB. J., BassB. M., & JungD. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441–462.
7.
BalthazardP. A., WaldmanD. A., & WarrenJ. E. (2009). Predictors of the emergence of transformational leadership in virtual decision teams. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 651–663.
8.
BarczakG., GriffinA., & KahnK. B. (2009). Trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 3–23.
9.
BarczakG., & McDonoughE. F. (2003). Leading global product development teams. Research Technology Management, 46(6), 14–18.
10.
BarczakG., McDonoughE. F., & AthanassiouN. (2006). So you want to be a global project leader?Research Technology Management, 49(3), 28–35.
11.
BarrickM. R., & MountM. K. (1999). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
12.
BassB., & AvolioB. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Mind-Garden.
13.
BassB. M., & AvolioB. J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 231–272.
14.
BeaumeR., ManiakR., & MidlerC. (2009). Crossing innovation and product projects management: A comparative analysis in the automotive industry. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 166–174.
15.
BelassiW., KondraA. Z., & TukelO. I. (2007). New product development projects: The effects of organizational culture. Project Management Journal, 38(4), 12–24.
16.
BuchananT., JohnsonJ. A., & GoldbergL. R. (2005). Implementing a five-factor personality inventory for use on the Internet. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(2), 115–127.
17.
ButlerJ. K., & ReeseR. M. (1991). Leadership style & sales performance test of situational leadership. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 11(3), 37–46.
18.
CabreraA., CollinsW. C., & SalgadoJ. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 245–264.
19.
CapraroR. M., & CapraroM. M. (2002). Myers-Briggs type indicator score reliability across studies: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 590–602.
20.
ChangD. R., & ChoH. (2008). Organizational memory influences new product success. Journal of Business Research, 61(1), 13–23.
21.
ChenJ., & AskinR. G. (2009). Project selection, scheduling and resource allocation with time dependent returns. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(1), 23–34.
22.
CohenJ. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scale disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213–220.
23.
CohenJ., CohenP., WestS. G., & AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
CongerJ. A., & KanungoR. (1988). Charismatic leadership in organizations.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
CooperR. G., & EdgettS. J. (2008). Maximizing productivity in product development. Research Technology Management, 51(2), 47–59.
26.
CronbachL. J., & SnowR. E. (1981). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions (2nd ed.). New York: Irvington.
27.
CrowneD. P., & MarloweD. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
28.
DavisD. (1995). Business research for decision making.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
29.
DeVellisR. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and application.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
DionneS. D., YammarinoF. J., AtwaterL. E., & JamesL. R. (2002). Neutralizing substitutes for leadership theory: Leadership effects and common-source bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 454–464.
31.
DionneS. D., YammarinoF. J., HowellJ. P., & VillaJ. (2005). Substitutes for leadership, or not. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 169–193.
32.
DobbinsG. H., LongW. S., DedrickE. J., & ClemonsT. C. (1990). The role of self-monitoring and gender on leader emergence: A laboratory and field study. Journal of Management, 16, 609–618.
33.
DumdumU. R., LoweK. B., & AvolioB. J. (2002). A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. In AvolioB. J., & YammarinoF. J. (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead (pp. 35–66). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
34.
DurmusogluS. S., CalantoneR. J., & SambamurthyV. (2006). Is more information technology better for new product development?Journal of Product and Brand Management, 15, 435–441.
35.
DvirT., EdenD., AvolioB. J., & ShamirB. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735–744.
36.
EisenbeissS. A., KnippenbergD. V., & BoernerS. (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1438–1446.
37.
FisherR. J., & KatzJ. E. (2000). Social-desirability bias and the validity of self-reported values. Psychology and Marketing, 17(2), 105–120.
38.
FurnhamA. (1996). The big five versus the big four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs type indicator (MBTI) and neo-pi five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 303–307.
39.
GassmannO., & ZedtwitzM.V. (2003). Trends and determinants of managing virtual R&D teams. R&D Management, 33, 243–262.
40.
GibsonC. B., CooperC.D., & CongerJ. A. (2009). Do you see what we see? The complex effects of perceptual distance between leaders and teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 62–76.
41.
GonzálezM. E., MuellerR. D., & MackR.W. (2008). An alternative approach in service quality: An e-banking case study. Quality Management Journal, 15(1), 41–60.
42.
GriffithD. A., HarmanciogluN., & DrogeC. (2009). Governance decisions for the offshore outsourcing of new product development in technology intensive markets. Journal of World Business, 44, 217–224.
43.
HairJ. F., BlackW. C., BabinB. J., AndersonR. E., & TathamR. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44.
HemetsbergerA., & GodulaG. (2007). Integrating expert customers in new product development in industrial business: Virtual routes to success. Innovative Marketing, 3(3), 28–39.
45.
HinkinT. R., & TraceyJ. B. (1999). The relevance of charisma for transformational leadership in stable organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(2), 105–115.
46.
HoughtonA. (2000, June). Using the Myers-Briggs type indicator for career development. Business Management Journal, pp. 2–3.
47.
HowellJ. M., NeufeldD. J., & AvolioB. J. (2005). Examining the relationship of leadership and physical distance with business unit performance. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 273–285.
48.
HowellJ. P., & DorfmanP. W. (1981). Substitutes for leaderships: Test of a construct. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 714–827.
49.
HowellJ. P., DorfmanP. W., & KerrS. (1986). Moderator variables in leadership research. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 88–102.
50.
HoytC. L., & BlascovichJ. (2003). Transformational and transactional leadership in virtual and physical environments. Small Group Research, 34, 678–715.
51.
ImS., & NakataC. (2008). Crafting an environment to foster integration in new product teams. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 164–172.
52.
JassawallaA. R., & SashittalH. C. (2000). Strategies of effective new product team leaders. California Management Review, 42(2), 34–51.
JudgeT. A., & BonoJ. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 751–765.
55.
JudgeT. A., BonoJ. E., IliesR., & GerhardtM. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780.
56.
JudgeT. A., & PiccoloR. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative value. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768.
57.
KahaiS., FjermestadJ., ZhangS., & AvolioB. J. (2007). Leadership in virtual teams: Past, present, and future. Leadership Quarterly, 18, i–x.
58.
KankanhalliA., TanB., & WeiK. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29, 113–143.
59.
KayworthT. R., & LeidnerD. E. (2002). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 7–40.
60.
KeeganA. E., & HartogD. N. D. (2004). Transformational leadership in a project-based environment: A comparative study of the leadership styles of project managers and line managers. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 609–617.
61.
KellerR. T. (2006). Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 202–210.
62.
KellowayE. E. K., BarlingJ., KelleyE., ComtoisJ., & GatienB. (2003). Remote transformational leadership. Learning & Organizational Development Journal, 23(3), 163–171.
63.
KerrS., & JermierJ. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375–403.
64.
KimB., & KimJ. (2009). Structural factors of NPD (new product development) team for manufacturability. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 690–702.
65.
KimS. H., KimM., & WooJ.Y. (2008). Organizational characteristics and the CRM adoption process. Journal of Business Research, 61, 65–74.
66.
KinderA., & RobertsonI. T. (1994). Do you have the personality to be a leader? The importance of personality dimensions for successful managers and leaders. Leadership and Organisation Development Journal, 15(1), 3–12.
67.
KodamaM. (2005). How two Japanese high-tech companies achieved rapid innovation via strategic community networks. Strategy & Leadership, 33(6), 39–47.
68.
LampelJ., ScarbroughH., & MacmillanS. (2008). Managing through projects in knowledge-based environments: Special issue introduction by the guest editors. Long Range Planning, 41(1), 7–16.
69.
LandersR. N., & LounsburyJ. W. (2006). An investigation of big five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 283–293.
70.
LevineD. M., StephanD., KrehbielT. C., & BerensonM. L. (2005). Statistics for managers using Microsoft Excel (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
71.
LiaoH., & ChuangA. (2004). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 41–58.
72.
LimB., & PloyhartR. E. (2004). Transformational leadership: Relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 610–621.
73.
LimL., RamanK. S., & WeiK. (1994). Interacting effects of GSS and leadership. Decision Support Systems, 12, 199–211.
74.
LinJ., ChaiK. H., WongY. S., & BrombacherA. C. (2008). A dynamic model for managing overlapped iterative product development. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 378–392.
75.
LokP., & CrawfordJ. (2004). The effect of organisational culture and leadership style on job satisfaction and organisational commitment: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Management Development, 23, 321–338.
76.
ManningT. T. (2003). Leadership across cultures: Attachment style influences. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(3), 20–30.
77.
ManzC. C., & SimmsH. P. (1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 5, 351–367.
78.
MarionT. J., & SimpsonT.W. (2009). New product development practice application to an early-stage firm: The case of the PaperPro® Stackmaster™. Design Studies, 30, 561–587.
79.
McCraeR. R., & CostaP. T. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.
80.
McCraeR. R., & CostaP. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.
81.
McKennaM. K., SheltonC. D., & DarlingJ. R. (2002). The impact of behavioral style assessment on organizational effectiveness: A call for action. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23, 314–322.
82.
MichaelJ. (2003). Using the Myers-Briggs type indicator as a tool for leadership development? Apply with caution. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(1), 68–81.
83.
MishraA. A., & ShahR. (2009). In union lies strength: Collaborative competence in new product development and its performance effects. Journal of Operations Management, 27, 324–338.
84.
Montoya-WeissM., & CalantoneR. (1994). Determinants of new product performance: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 397–417.
85.
MumfordM. D., ScottG. M., GaddisB., & StrangeJ. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705–750.
86.
NgK.-Y., AngS., & ChanK.-Y. (2008). Personality and leader effectiveness: A moderated mediation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 733–743.
87.
NgaiE.W. T., LawC. C. H., & WatF. K. T. (2008). Examining the critical success factors in the adoption of enterprise resource planning. Computers in Industry, 59, 548–564.
OkeA., Idiagbon-OkeM., & WalumbwaF. (2008). The relationship between brokers’ influence, strength of ties and NPD project outcomes in innovation-driven horizontal networks. Journal of Operations Management, 26, 571–589.
90.
ParkM. H.-J., LimJ.W., & Birnbaum-MoreP. H. (2009). The effect of multiknowledge individuals on performance in cross-functional new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 86–96.
91.
PatanakulP., & MilosevicD. (2006). Assigning new product projects to multiple-project managers: What market leaders do. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 17(1), 53–69.
92.
PatanakulP., & MilosevicD. (2008). A competency model for effectiveness in managing multiple projects. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 18(2), 118–131.
93.
PentinaI., & StruttonD. (2007). Information processing and new product success: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(2), 149–175.
94.
PinningtonA., & HaslopD. (1995). Team leader autonomy in new product development. Management Decision, 33(9), 5–11.
95.
PodsakoffP. M., BommerW. H., PodsakoffN. P., & MacKenzieS. B. (2006). Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 113–142.
96.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., & BommerW. H. (1996). Meta-analysis of the relationships between Kerr and Jermier's substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 380–399.
97.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., LeeJ. Y., & PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
98.
PonsD. (2008). Project management for new product development. Project Management Journal, 39(2), 82–97.
99.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (4th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author.
100.
ReynoldsW. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125.
101.
SankarY. (2003). Character not charisma is the critical measure of leadership excellence. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(4), 45–55.
102.
SarinS., & McDermottC. (2003). The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences, 34, 707–739.
103.
SchmicklC., & KieserA. (2008). How much do specialists have to learn from each other when they jointly develop radical product innovations?Research Policy, 37, 473–491.
104.
SheardA. G., & KakabadseA. P. (2004). A process perspective on leadership and team development. Journal of Management Development, 23(1), 97–106.
105.
ShermanJ. D., BerkowitzD., & SounderW. E. (2005). New product development performance and the interaction of cross-functional integration and knowledge management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 399–411.
106.
SizooS. L., MalhotraN., & BearsonJ. (2003). A gender-based comparison of the learning strategies of adult business students. College Student Journal, 37(1), 103–111.
107.
SongM., & NohJ. (2006). Best new product development and management practices in the Korean high-tech industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 262–278.
108.
SosikJ. J. (2005). The role of personal values in the charismatic leadership of corporate managers: A model and preliminary field study. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 221–244.
109.
StemlerS. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(4). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=4
110.
StewartD.W. (2009). Role of method: Some parting comments from a departing editor. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 381–383.
111.
StrangK. D. (2005). Examining effective and ineffective transformational project leadership. Team Performance Management Journal, 11(3/4), 68–103.
112.
StrangK. D. (2007). Examining effective technology project leadership traits and behaviours. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 424–462.
113.
StrangK. D. (2008). Collaborative synergy and leadership in e-business. In SalmonsJ., & WilsonL. (Eds.), Handbook of research on electronic collaboration and organizational synergy (pp. 409–434). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
114.
StrangK. D. (2009a). Assessing team member interpersonal competencies in new product development e-projects. International Journal of Project & Organisation Management, 4, 335–357.
115.
StrangK. D. (2009b). Using recursive regression to explore nonlinear relationships and interactions: A tutorial applied to a multicultural education study. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(3), 1–13.
116.
SwinkM., TalluriS., & PandejpongT. (2006). Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 542–562.
117.
TanJ., TylerK., & ManicaA. (2008). Business-to-business adoption of ecommerce in China. Information & Management, 44, 332–351.
118.
TaylorE. Z. (2006). The effect of incentives on knowledge sharing in computer-mediated communication: An experimental investigation. Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 103–116.
119.
TsaiM.-T., & HuangY.-C. (2008). Exploratory learning and new product performance: The moderating role of cognitive skills and environmental uncertainty. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 19(2), 83–93.
ValleS., & AvellaL. (2003). Cross-functionality and leadership of the new product development teams. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 32–47.
122.
WangC. C., & LaiC.Y. (2006). Knowledge contribution in the online virtual community: Capability and motivation. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 4092, 442–453.
123.
WaskoM. M., & FarajS. (2006). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29, 35–57.
124.
WerthL., MarkelP., & FösterJ. (2006). The role of subjective theories for leadership evaluation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 102–127.
125.
WoutersM., AndersonJ. C., NarusJ. A., & WynstraF. (2009). Improving sourcing decisions in NPD projects: Monetary quantification of points of difference. Journal of Operations Management, 27(1), 64–77.
126.
YammarinoF. J., DionneS. D., ChunJ. U., & DanserauF. (2005). Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 879–919.
127.
YooY., & AlaviM. (2004). Emergent leadership in virtual teams: What do emergent leaders do?Information and Organization, 14(1), 27–58.
128.
YuklG. A. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
129.
YuklG. A., GordonA., & TaberT. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a halfcentury of behavior research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 15–33.
