The increasing projectification of the business world corresponds with a high diversity of theoretical perspectives used in project management research. This diversity is reflected by a variety of influencing factors, which have been the subject of empirical studies. This article aims to systemize the different streams of research on the basis of a literature review and at developing a research framework by integrating multiple theoretical perspectives and influencing factors. We elaborate on the crosslinks between the perspectives and identify fundamental elements of a project management theory. The framework consists of three dimensions: design, context, and goal. Its purpose is to support the combination of different perspectives and the development of strategies for further research.
AndersonD. K., & MernaT. (2003). Project management strategy—Project management represented as a process based set of management domains and the consequences for project management strategy. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 387–393.
2.
AndersonD. K., & MernaA. (2005). Project management is a capital investment process. Journal of Management in Engineering, 21(4), 173–178.
3.
ArttoK., HeinonenR., AreniusM., KovanenV., & NybergT. (1998). Global project business and the dynamics of change.Espoo, Finland: Project Management Association Finland.
4.
Association for Project Management (2006). APM body of knowledge.Buckinghamshire, UK: Author.
5.
AtkinsonR. (1999). Project management: Cost, time, and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17, 337–342.
6.
AtkinsonR., CrawfordL., & WardS. (2006). Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 687–698.
7.
BaccariniD. (1999). The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25–32.
8.
BachrarachS. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 496–521.
9.
BalkundiP., & HarrisonD. A. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure's effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 49–68.
10.
BesnerC., & HobbsB. (2006). The perceived value and potential contribution of project management practices to project success. Project Management Journal, 37(7), 37–48.
11.
BredilletC. N. (2007). Exploring research in project management— Nine schools of project management research (part 1). Project Management Journal, 38(2), 3–4.
12.
BredilletC. N. (2007b). Exploring research in project management— Nine schools of project management research (part 2). Project Management Journal, 38(3), 3–5.
13.
BredilletC. N. (2007). Exploring research in project management— Nine schools of project management research (part 3). Project Management Journal, 38(4), 2–4.
14.
BredilletC. N. (2008). Exploring research in project management— Nine schools of project management research (part 4). Project Management Journal, 39(1), 2–6.
15.
BredilletC. N. (2008b). Exploring research in project management— Nine schools of project management research (part 5). Project Management Journal, 39(2), 2–4.
16.
BredilletC. N. (2008c). Exploring research in project management— Nine schools of project management research (part 6). Project Management Journal, 39(3), 2–5.
17.
BresnenM., GoussevskaiaA., & SwanJ. (2005). Managing projects as complex social settings. Building Research & Information, 33, 487–493.
18.
CicmilS., & HodgsonD. (2006). New possibilities for project management theory: A critical engagement. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 111–122.
19.
CicmilS., WilliamsT., ThomasJ., & HodgsonD. (2006). Rethinking project management: Researching the actuality of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 675–686.
20.
ClelandD. I., & KingW. R. (1968). Systems analysis and project management.New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Cooke-DaviesT. J. (2002). The “real” success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20, 185–190.
22.
CrawfordL. H. (2006). Developing organizational project management capability: Theory and practice. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 74–86.
23.
CrawfordL. H., & Cooke-DaviesT. J. (1999). Enhancing corporate performance through sustainable project management communities.Proceedings of the 30th Annual Project Management Institute 1999 Seminars & Symposium, Sylva, NC. Retrieved from http://www.projectperformance.com.au/downloads/99pmi.pdf
24.
CrawfordL. H., HobbsB., & TurnerJ. R. (2006). Aligning capability with strategy: Categorizing projects to do the right projects and to do them right. Project Management Journal, 37(2), 38–50.
25.
CrawfordL., PollackJ., & EnglandD. (2006). Uncovering the trends in project management: Journal emphases over the last 10 years. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 175–184.
26.
DaiC. X., & WellsW. G. (2004). An exploration of project management office features and their relationship to project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 523–532.
27.
De MeyerA., LochC. H., & PichM. T. (2002). Managing project uncertainty: From variation to chaos. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(2), 60–67.
28.
De WitA. (1988). Measurement of project success. Project Management, 6(3), 164–170.
29.
DorfR. C., & BishopR. H. (2007). Modern control systems.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
DvirD., & LechlerT. (2004). Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: The impact of changes on project success. Research Policy, 33(1), 1–15.
31.
EnglundR. L., & GrahamR. J. (1999). From experience: Linking projects to strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(11), 52–64.
32.
EngwallM. (2003). No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context. Research Policy, 32, 789–808.
FrameJ. D. (1994). The new project management—Tools for an age of rapid change, corporate reengineering, and other business realities.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35.
GeraldiJ. G., & AdlbrechtG. (2007). On faith, fact, and interaction in projects. Project Management Journal, 38(1), 32–43.
36.
GibbonsM., LimogesC., NowotnyH., SchwartzmanS., ScottP., & TrowM. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies.London: Sage.
37.
GillardS., & JoharisenJ. (2004). Project management communication: A systems approach. Journal of Information Science, 30(1), 23–29.
38.
GoodmanR. A., & GoodmanL. P. (1976). Some management issues in temporary systems: A study of professional development and manpower— The theater case. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 494–501.
39.
GrantR. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organizational Science, 7, 375–387.
40.
GrundyT. (1998). Strategy implementation and project management. International Journal of Project Management, 16(1), 43–50.
41.
HarkemaS. (2003). A complex adaptive perspective on learning within innovation projects. The Learning Organization, 10, 340–346.
42.
HenrieM., & Sousa-PozaA. (2005). Project management: A cultural liter-ary review. Project Management Journal, 36(2), 5–14.
43.
HobbsB., AubryM., & ThuillierD. (2008). The project management office as an organisational innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 547–555.
44.
HoeglM., & GemuendenH. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12, 435–449.
45.
HuangJ. C., & NewellS. (2003). Knowledge integration processes and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 167–176.
46.
JalkalaA., CovaB., SalleR., & SalminenR. T. (2009). Changing project business orientations: Toward a new logic of project marketing. European Management Journal, 28, 124–138.
JugdevK. (2004). Research issues: A conceptual look at project management as a source of competitive advantage. Paper presented at the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, June 5-8, 2004, Quebec City, Quebec.
49.
JugdevK. (2005). Project management as a strategic asset: What does it look like and how do companies get there? In IP SlevinD., ClelandD. I., & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), Innovations: Project Management Research Conference 2004 (pp. 161–174). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
50.
KendraK., & TaplinL. J. (2004). Project success: A cultural framework. Project Management Journal, 35(1), 30–45.
51.
KennyJ. (2003). Effective project management for strategic innovation and change in an organizational context. Project Management Journal, 34(1), 43–53.
52.
KerznerH. (1979). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling.New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
53.
KerznerH. (2003). Strategic planning for a project office. Project Management Journal, 34(2), 13–25.
54.
KerznerH. (2006). Project management. A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
55.
KhazanchiS., LewisM. W., & BoyerK. K. (2007). Innovation-supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 871–884.
56.
KloppenborgT. J., & OpferW. A. (2002). The current state of project management research: Trends, interpretations, and predictions. Project Management Journal, 33(2), 5–18.
57.
LechlerT. (2010). Project value mindset of project managers. Proceedings of the PMI Research Conference2010, 11–14 July, Washington, DC.
58.
LeungM. Y., & LiuA. M. M. (2003). Analysis of value and project goal specificity in value management. Construction Management & Economics, 21(1), 11–19.
59.
LewisM. W., & GrimesA. J. (1999). Metatriangulation. Building theory from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Review, 24, 672–692.
60.
LiuA. M. M. (1999). A research model of project complexity and goal com-mitment effects on project outcome. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management, 6(2), 105–111.
61.
LockD. L. (1968). Project management.London: Gower.
62.
LuhmannN. (1996). Social systems.Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
63.
LundinR.A., & SöderholmA. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11, 437–455.
64.
LundinR. A., & SöderholmA. (1998). Conceptualizing a projectified society: Discussion of an eco-institutional approach to a theory on temporary organizations. In LundinR., & MidlerC. (Eds.), Projects as arenas for renewal and learning processes (pp. 13–24). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
65.
LyneisJ. M., CooperK. G., & ElsS. A. (2001). Strategic management of complex projects: A case study using system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 17, 237–260.
66.
MathieA., & GreeneJ. C. (1997). Stakeholder participation in evaluation: How important is diversity?Evaluation and Program Planning, 20, 279–285.
67.
MeadS. P. (2001). Using social network analysis to visualize project teams. Project Management Journal, 32(4), 32–38.
68.
MecklR. (2004). Organising and leading M&A projects. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 455–462.
69.
MeredithJ. R., & MantelS. J. (2006). Project management: A managerial approach.Hoboken: Wiley.
70.
MilosevicD. Z., InmanL., & OzbayA. (2001). Impact of project management standardization on project effectiveness. Engineering Management Journal, 13(4), 9–16.
71.
MilosevicD. Z., & SrivannaboonS. (2006). A theoretical framework for aligning project management with business strategy. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 98–110.
72.
ModigN. (2007). A continuum of organizations formed to carry out proj-ects: Temporary and stationary organization forms. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 807–814.
73.
MorrisP. W. G., & HoughG. H. (1987). The anatomy of major projects: A study of the reality of project management.New York: Wiley.
74.
MorrisP. W. G., & JamiesonA. (2005). Moving from corporate strategy to project strategy. Project Management Journal, 36(4), 5–18.
75.
MorrisonJ. M., BrownC. J., & SmitE.V. D. M. (2006). A supportive organi-sational culture for project management in matrix organisations: A theo-retical perspective. South African Journal of Business Management, 37(4), 39–54.
76.
NonakaI. (1994). A dynamic theory of the organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.
77.
PackendorffJ. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11, 319–333.
78.
PetersonT. M. (2007). Motivation: How to increase project team performance. Project Management Journal, 38(4), 60–69.
79.
PichM. T., LochC. H., & De MeyerA. (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48, 1008–1023.
80.
PintoJ. K., & MantelS. J. (1990). The causes of project failure. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37, 269–276.
81.
PopperK. (1974). Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach.Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
82.
PrencipeA., & TellF. (2001). Interproject learning: Processes and out-comes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Research Policy, 30, 1373–1394.
83.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide; 4th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author.
84.
RadP. F. (2003). Project success attributes. Cost Engineering, 45(4), 23–29.
RahmandadH. (2008). Effect of delays on complexity of organizational learning. Management Science, 54, 1297–1312.
87.
ReveT. (1990). The firm as a nexus of internal and external contracts. In AokiM. (Ed.), The firm as a nexus of treaties (pp. 133–161). London: Sage.
88.
RoperS., DuJ., & LoveJ. H. (2008). Modelling the innovation value chain. Research Policy, 37, 961–977.
89.
SauerC., & ReichB. (2007). What do we want from a theory of project management? A response to Rodney Turner. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 1–2.
90.
SaynischM. (2010). Beyond frontiers of traditional project management: An approach to evolutionary, self-organizational principles and the complexity theory-results of the research program. Project Management Journal, 41(2), 21–37.
91.
SchindlerM., & EpplerM. J. (2003). Harvesting project knowledge: A review of project learning methods and success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 219–228.
92.
SenseA. J. (2003a). Learning generators: Project teams re-conceptualized. Project Management Journal, 34(3), 4–12.
93.
SenseA. J. (2003b). A model of the politics of project leader learning. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 107–114.
94.
ShenharA. J. (2001). Contingent management in temporary, dynamic organizations: The comparative analysis of projects. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12, 239–271.
95.
ShenharA. J. (2004). Strategic project leadership toward a strategic approach to project management. R&D Management, 34, 569–578.
96.
ShenharA. J., AaronJ., & LevyO. (1997). Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project Management Journal, 28(2), 5–13.
97.
ShenharA. J., & DvirD. (1996). Toward a typological theory of project management. Research Policy, 25, 607–632.
ShenharA. J., & DvirD. (2007b). Reinventing project management.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
100.
ShoreB., & CrossB. J. (2005). Exploring the role of national culture in the management of large-scale international science projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23, 55–64.
101.
SmithG. R. (1999). Project leadership: Why project management alone doesn't work. Hospital Material Management Quarterly, 21(1), 88–92.
102.
SöderlundJ. (2004a). Building theories of project management: Past research, questions for the future. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 183–191.
103.
SöderlundJ. (2004b). On the broadening scope of the research on projects: A review and a model for analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 655–667.
104.
SteffensW., MartinsuoM., & ArttoK. (2007). Change decisions in product development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 702–713.
105.
SuttonR. I., & StawB. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371–384.
106.
SydowJ., LindkvistL., & DeFillippiR. (2004). Project-based organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge. Organization Studies, 25, 1475–1489.
107.
TansleyC., & NewellS. (2007). Project social capital, leadership and trust: A study of human resource information systems development. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 350–368.
108.
ThiryM. (2002). Combining value and project management into an effective programme management model. International Journal of Project Management, 20, 221–227.
109.
ThiryM., & DeguireM. (2007). Recent developments in project-based organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 649–658.
110.
ThomasJ., & MullalyM. (2007). Understanding the value of project management: First steps on an international investigation in search of value. Project Management Journal, 38(3), 74–89.
111.
TurnerJ. R. (1993). The handbook of project based management.London: McGraw-Hill.
112.
TurnerJ. R. (2006). Editorial: Towards a theory of project management: The functions of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 187–189.
113.
TurnerJ. R. (2006b). Editorial: Towards a theory of project management: The nature of the functions of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 277–279.
114.
TurnerJ. R. (2006c). Editorial: Towards a theory of project management: The nature of the project. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 1–3.
115.
TurnerJ. R. (2006d). Editorial: Towards a theory of project management: The nature of the project governance and project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 93–95.
116.
TurnerJ. R. (2009). The handbook of project-based management (3rd ed.). London: McGraw-Hill.
117.
TurnerJ. R., HuemannM., AnbariF. T., & BredilletC. N. (2010). Perspectives on projects.Milton, UK: Routledge.
118.
TurnerJ. R., & MüllerR. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 1–8.
119.
Van den EndeJ., WijnbergN., VogelsR., & KerstensM. (2003). Organizing innovative projects to interact with market dynamics: A coevolutionary approach. European Management Journal, 21, 273–284.
120.
van DonkD. P., & MolloyE. (2008). From organising as projects to projects as organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 129–137.
121.
von FoersterH. (1981). On cybernetics of cybernetics and social theory. In RothG., & SchweglerH. (Eds.), Self-organizing systems (pp. 102–105). Frankfurt: Campus.
122.
WangX. (2001). Dimensions and current status of project management culture. Project Management Journal, 32(4), 4–17.
123.
WardS., & ChapmanC. (2003). Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 97–105.
124.
WateridgeJ. (1995). IT projects: A basis for success. International Journal of Project Management, 13, 169–172.
125.
WeickK. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 385–390.
WhettenD. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution. Academy of Management Review, 14, 490–495.
128.
WhitleyR. (2006). Project-based firms: New organizational form or variations on a theme?Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), 77–99.
129.
WinchG. M. (2000). The management of projects as a generic business process. In LundinR. A., & HartmanF. (Eds.), Projects as business constituents and guiding motives (pp. 117–130). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
130.
WinchG. M. (2007). Managing project stakeholders. In MorrisP., & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), The Wiley guide to project, program, and portfolio management (pp. 271–289). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
131.
WinterM., AndersenE. S., ElvinR., & LeveneR. (2006). Focusing on business projects as an area for future research: An exploratory discussion of four different perspectives. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 699–709.
132.
WinterM., SmithC., MorrisP., & CicmilS. (2006). Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 638–649.
133.
YuA. G., FlettP. D., & BowersJ. A. (2005). Developing a value-centred proposal for assessing project success. International Journal of Project Management, 23, 428–436.
