This article presents empirical results on different managers' viewpoints regarding the sources and management of project portfolio uncertainty. As a key result, this study demonstrates the versatility of uncertainties experienced by managers, the limited degree of perceived control over them, the use of an almost complete management control package in managing uncertainties, and the necessity of managers' cooperation in the skilled use of the management control package when managing uncertainties. In addition, a further research agenda is proposed.
AbernethyM. A., & BrownellP. (1999). The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: An exploratory study.Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(3), 189–204.
2.
AdlerP. S., & ChenC.X. (2011). Understanding individual motivation in large-scale collaborative creativity.Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(2), 63–85.
3.
AhrensT., & ChapmanC.S. (2007). Management accounting as practice.Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1-2), 1–27.
4.
BeringerC., JonasD., & KockA. (2013). Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success.International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 830–846.
5.
BiedenbachT., & MüllerR. (2012). Absorptive, innovative and adaptive capabilities and their impact on project and project portfolio performance.International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 621–635.
6.
BlichfeldtB. S., & EskerodP. (2008). Project portfolio management—There's more to it than what management enacts.International Journal of Project Management, 26(4), 357–365.
7.
BlomquistT., & MüllerR. (2006). Practices, roles, and responsibilities of middle managers in program and portfolio management.Project Management Journal, 37(1), 52–66.
8.
BurchellS., ClubbC., HopwoodA., HughesJ., & NahapietJ. (1980). The roles of accounting in organizations and society.Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(1), 5–27.
9.
ChapmanC.S. (1998). Accountants in organisational networks.Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(8), 737–766.
10.
ChenhallR.H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future.Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3), 127–168.
11.
ChiaR., & HoltR. (2006). Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective.Organization Studies, 27(5), 635–655.
12.
ChristiansenJ. K., & VarnesC. (2008). From models to practice: Decision making at portfolio meetings.International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 25(1), 87–101.
13.
CooperR., EdgettS., & KleinschmidtE. (1997). Portfolio management in new product development: Lessons from the leaders I.Research Technology Management, 40(5), 16–28.
14.
DavilaT., FosterG., & LiM. (2009). Reasons for management control systems adoption: Insights from product development systems choice by early-stage entrepreneurial companies.Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3-4), 322–347.
15.
DavilaT. (2000). An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems' design in new product development.Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(4-5), 383–409.
16.
DitilloA. (2012). Designing management control systems to foster knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive firms: A network-based approach.European Accounting Review, 21(3), 425–450.
17.
DuncanR.B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313–327.
18.
DvirD., & LechlerT. (2004). Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: The impact of changes on project success.Research Policy, 33(1), 1–15.
GeraldiJ.G. (2008). The balance between order and chaos in multi-project firms: A conceptual model.International Journal of Project Management, 26(4), 348–356.
21.
HällgrenM., & SöderholmA. (2010). Orchestrating deviations in global projects: Projects-as-practice observations.Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(4), 352–367.
22.
HenriJ.-F. (2010). The periodic review of performance indicators: An empirical study of the dynamism of performance measurement systems.European Accounting Review, 19(1), 73–96.
23.
JerbrantA., & GustavssonT. (2013). Managing project portfolios: Balancing flexibility and structure by improvising.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(1), 152–172.
24.
JonasD. (2010). Empowering project portfolio managers: How management involvement impacts project portfolio management performance.International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 818–831.
25.
JørgensenB., & MessnerM. (2009). Management control in new product development: The dynamics of managing flexibility and efficiency.Journal of Management Accounting Research, 21, 99–124.
26.
KillenC. P., & HuntR.A. (2010). Dynamic capability through project portfolio management in service and manufacturing industries.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3(1), 157–169.
27.
KillenC. P., HuntR. A., & KleinschmidtE.J. (2008). Learning investments and organizational capabilities. Case studies on the development of project portfolio management capabilities.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1(3), 334–351.
28.
KnightF.H. (2006). Risk, uncertainty and profit.New York, NY: Cosimo, Inc.
29.
KorhonenT., LaineT., & SuomalaP. (2013). Understanding performance measurement dynamism: A case study.Journal of Management & Governance, 17(1), 35–58.
30.
LawrenceP. R., & LorschJ.W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1–47.
LochC. (2000). Tailoring product development to strategy: Case of a European technology manufacturer.European Management Journal, 18(3), 246–258.
33.
MalmiT., & BrownD.A. (2008). Management control systems as a package: Opportunities, challenges and research directions.Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287–300.
34.
MartinsuoM. (2013). Project portfolio management in practice and in context.International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 794–803.
35.
McNallyR. C., DurmusogluS. S., CalantoneR. J., & HarmanciogluN. (2009). Exploring new product portfolio management decisions: The role of managers' dispositional traits.Industrial Marketing Management, 38(1), 127–143.
36.
MerchantK.A. (1982). The control function of management.Sloan Management Review, 23(4), 43–55.
37.
MiaL., & ChenhallR.H. (1994). The usefulness of management accounting systems, functional differentiation and managerial effectiveness.Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(1), 1–13.
38.
MillerR., & LessardD. (2001). Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects.International Journal of Project Management, 19(8), 437–443.
39.
OlssonR. (2008). Risk management in a multi-project environment.International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 25(1), 60–71.
40.
OuchiW.G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms.Management Science, 25(9), 833–848.
41.
OuchiW.G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans.Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 129–141.
42.
PetitY. (2012). Project portfolios in dynamic environments: Organizing for uncertainty.International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 539–553.
43.
PetitY., & HobbsB. (2010). Project portfolios in dynamic environments: Sources of uncertainty and sensing mechanisms.Project Management Journal, 41(4), 46–58.
44.
RabinoS. (2001). The accountant's contribution to product development teams and a case study.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18(1), 73–90.
45.
SimonsR. (1991). Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems.Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 49–62.
46.
SimonsR. (1994). How new top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal.Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 169–189.
47.
SimonsR. (1995). Levers of control.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
48.
TellerJ. (2013). Portfolio risk management and its contribution to project portfolio success: An investigation of organization, process, and culture.Project Management Journal.44(2), 36–51.
49.
TellerJ., UngerB., KockA., & GemündenH.G. (2012). Formalization of project portfolio management: The moderating role of project portfolio complexity.International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 596–607.
50.
TessierS., & OtleyD. (2012). A conceptual development of Simons' levers of control framework.Accounting Organizations and Society, 23(3), 171–185.
51.
ThompsonJ. D., & TudenA. (1959). Strategies, structures and processes of organizational decision. In ThompsonJ. D., HammondP. B., HawkesR. W., JunkerB. H., & TudenA. (Eds.), Comparative studies in administration (pp. 195–216). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
52.
UngerB. N., KockA., GemündenH. G., & JonasD. (2012). Enforcing strategic fit of project portfolios by project termination: An empirical study on senior management involvement.International Journal of Project Management, 30(6), 675–685.
53.
VossM., & KockA. (2013). Impact of relationship value on project portfolio success: Investigating the moderating effects of portfolio characteristics and external turbulence.International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 847–861.
54.
YlinenM., & GullkvistB.M. (2012). The effects of tolerance for ambiguity and task uncertainty on the balanced and combined use of project controls.European Accounting Review, 21(2), 395–415.
55.
YlinenM., & GullkvistB.M. (in press). The effects of organic and mechanistic control in exploratory and exploitative innovations.Management Accounting Research, Forthcoming.
56.
Zika-ViktorssonA., SundströmP., & EngwallM. (2006). Project overload: An exploratory study of work and management in multi-project settings.International Journal of Project Management, 24(5), 385–394.
