Drawing on the current research in general leadership, we propose that a process ontology is relevant and rewarding for project leadership studies. We argue that project leadership can be studied as the ongoing social production of direction through the construction of actors' space of action, involving continuous construction and reconstruction of (1) past project activities and events; (2) positions and areas of responsibility; (3) discarded, ongoing, and future issues; and (4) intensity, rhythm, and pace. Through an ethnographic case study of an organizational change project, we show how space of action and hence the project direction are in constant flux and becoming.
AlvessonM. (1996). Leadership studies: From procedure and abstraction to reflexivity and situation.The Leadership Quarterly, 7(4), 455–485.
2.
AtkinsonP., & HammersleyM. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248–261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
3.
BarkerR.A. (2001). The nature of leadership.Human Relations, 54(4), 469–494.
4.
BarleyS. R., & KundaG. (2001). Bringing work back in.Organization Science, 12(1), 76–95.
5.
BlomquistT., HällgrenM., NilssonA., & SöderholmA. (2010). Project-as-practice: In search of project management research that matters.Project Management Journal, 41(1), 5–16.
6.
BlomquistT., & PackendorffJ. (1998). Learning from renewal projects: Content, context and embeddedness. In LundinR. A., & MidlerC. (Eds.), Projects as arenas for renewal and learning processes (pp. 37–46). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
7.
CarrollB., LevyL., & RichmondD. (2008). Leadership as practice: Challenging the competency paradigm.Leadership, 4(4), 363–379.
8.
ChiaR. (1995). From modern to postmodern organizational analysis.Organization Studies, 16(4), 579–604.
9.
CicmilS., WilliamsT., ThomasJ., & HodgsonD. (2006). Rethinking project management: Researching the actuality of projects.International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 675–686.
10.
CrevaniL. (2011). Clearing for action: Leadership as a relational phenomenon.Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
11.
CrevaniL., LindgrenM., & PackendorffJ. (2007). Shared leadership: A post-heroic perspective on leadership as a social construction.International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(1), 40–67.
12.
CrevaniL., LindgrenM., & PackendorffJ. (2010). Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interactions.Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(1), 77–86.
13.
DachlerH. P., & HoskingD.M. (1995). The primacy of relations in socially constructing organizational realities. In HoskingD.-M., DachlerH. P., & GergenK. J. (Eds.), Management and organization: Relational alternatives to individualism.Aldershot, England: Avebury.
14.
DenisJ.-L., LangleyA., & RouleauL. (2010). The practice of leadership in the messy world of organizations.Leadership, 6(1), 67–88.
15.
DenisJ.-L., LangleyA., & SergiV. (2012). Leadership in the plural.The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 211–283.
16.
DilleT., & SöderlundJ. (2011) Managing inter-institutional projects: The significance of isochronism, timing norms and temporal misfits.International Journal of Project Management, 29(4), 480–490.
17.
DrathW. H., McCauleyC. D., PalusC. J., Van VelsorE., O'ConnorP.M.G., & McGuireJ.B. (2008). Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership.The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 635–653.
18.
GergenK.J. (2010). Co-constitution, causality, and confluence: Organizing in a world without entities. In HernesT., and MaitlisS. (Eds.), Process, sensemaking and organizing (pp. 1–26). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
19.
GrintK. (2005). Leadership: Limits and possibilities.Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
GrintK., & JacksonB. (2010). Toward “socially constructive” social constructions of leadership.Management Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 348–355.
21.
GronnP. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis.The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423–451.
22.
HernesT. (2008). Understanding organization as process: Theory for a tangled world.Abingdon, Oxon, England: Routledge.
HodgsonD., & BriandL. (2013). Controlling the uncontrollable: ‘Agile’ teams and illusions of autonomy in creative work.Work, Employment and Society, 27(2), 308–325.
25.
HodgsonD., & CicmilS. (2007). The politics of standards in modern management: Making ‘the project’ a reality.Journal of Management Studies, 44, 431–450.
26.
HolmbergI., & TyrstrupM. (2010). Well then—what now? An everyday approach to managerial leadership.Leadership, 6(4), 353–372.
27.
Holmer-NadesanM. (1996). Organizational identity and space of action.Organization Studies, 17(1), 49–81.
28.
KaplanS., & OrlikowskiW.J. (2013). Temporal work in strategy making.Organization Science, 24(4), 965–995.
29.
KellyS. (2013). Towards a negative ontology of leadership.Human Relations (forthcoming).
30.
KnightsD., & WillmottH. (1992). Conceptualizing leadership processes: A study of senior managers in a financial services company.Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 761–782.
31.
KoskinenK.U. (2012). Organizational learning in project-based companies: A process thinking approach.Project Management Journal, 43(3), 40–49.
32.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data.Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.
33.
LangleyA., SmallmanC., TsoukasH., & Van de VenA. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity and flow.Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13.
34.
LarssonM., & LundholmS.E. (2010). Leadership as work-embedded influence: A micro-discursive analysis of an everyday interaction in a bank.Leadership, 6(2), 159–184.
35.
LefebvreH. (1992/2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life.London, England: Continuum.
36.
LindgrenM., & PackendorffJ. (2009). Project leadership revisited: Towards distributed leadership perspectives in project research.International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 1(3), 285–308.
37.
LindgrenM., & PackendorffJ. (2011). Issues, responsibilities and identities: A distributed leadership perspective on biotechnology R&D management.Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(3), 157–170.
38.
LindgrenM., PackendorffJ., & SergiV. (2014). Thrilled by the context, suffering through the experience: Emotions in project-based work.Human Relations (forthcoming).
39.
LindgrenM., PackendorffJ., & ThamH. (2011). Relational dysfunctionality: Leadership interactions in a Sarbanes-Oxley Act implementation project.European Journal of International Management, 5(1), 13–29.
40.
LinehanC., & KavanaghD. (2006). From project ontologies to communities of virtue. In HodgsonD., & CicmilS. (Eds.), Making projects critical (pp. 51–67). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
41.
LorinoP., & MoureyD. (2013). The experience of time in the inter-organizing inquiry: A present thickened by dialog and situations.Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(1), 48–62.
42.
Maaninen-OlssonE., & MüllernT. (2009). A contextual understanding of projects: The importance of space and time.Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(3), 327–339.
43.
MaitlisS. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking.Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49.
44.
PackendorffJ., & LindgrenM. (2014). Projectification and its consequences: Narrow and broad conceptualisations.South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17(1), 7–21.
45.
ParryK.W., & BrymanA. (2006). Leadership in organizations. In CleggS.R., HardyC., LawrenceT.B., & NordW.R. (Eds.) The Sage handbook of organization studies.London, England: Sage.
46.
RaelinJ. (2011). From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice.Leadership, 7(2), 195–211.
47.
Samra–FredericksD. (2003). Strategizing as lived experience and strategists' everyday efforts to shape strategic direction.Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 141–174.
48.
SegercrantzB. (2009). Towards a (more) critical and social constructionist approach to new product development.ephemera: theory & politics in organization, 9(2), 182–194.
49.
SergiV. (2012). Bounded becoming: Insights from understanding projects in situation.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(3), 345–363.
50.
SpillaneJ. P., HalversonR., & DiamondJ.B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34.
51.
SöderlundJ., VaagaasarA., & AndersenE. (2008). Relating, reflecting and routinizing: Developing project competence in cooperation with others.International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 517–526.
TurnerR., & MüllerR. (2005). The project manager's leadership style as a success factor on projects: A literature review.Project Management Journal, 36, 49–61.
54.
TurnerR., & MüllerR. (2006). Choosing appropriate project managers: Matching their leadership style to type of project.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
55.
TyssenA. K., WaldA., & SpiethP. (2013). Leadership in temporary organizations: A review of leadership theories and a research agenda.Project Management Journal, 44(6), 52–67.
56.
Uhl-BienM. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing.The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654–676.
57.
VaagaasarA. L., & AndersenE.S. (2007). On task evolvement in renewal projects.International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), 346–355.
58.
Van MaanenJ. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
