Yanchar, Slife, and Warne (2008) recently contrasted core assumptions of the method-centered, scientific analytic reasoning approach to critical thinking that is dominant in psychology with their own alternative approach emphasizing integration of information from multiple perspectives. They contended that emphasis on the scientific analytic approach is associated with justification and neglects other strategies such as more open-minded and respectful dialogue that could promote innovation and theory development. This commentary on their article examines these claims in light of research on critical-thinking dispositions and scientific discovery. Their claims received mixed support, prompting recommendations for additional research and using the research evidence to revise the psychological claims of their alternative approach.
BaerJ. (2003). Evaluative thinking, creativity, and task specificity: Separating wheat from chaff is not the same as finding needles in haystacks. In RuncoM. A., Critical creative processes (pp. 129–151). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
2.
BailinS. (1987). Critical and creative thinking. Informal Logic, 9, 23–29.
3.
BailinS. (1992). Discovery, justification, and the generalizability question. In NorrisS. P., The generalizability of critical thinking (pp. 87–96). New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
BenjafieldJ. G. (1994). Thinking critically about research methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
BensleyD. A. (1998). Critical thinking in psychology: A unified skills approach. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
6.
BensleyD. A. (2006). Why great thinkers sometimes fail to think critically. Skeptical Inquirer, 30, 47–52.
7.
BensleyD. A. & BatesA. (2005). The inventory of thinking dispositions in psychology. Unpublished test.
8.
CacioppoJ. T., & PettyR. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.
9.
ClarkR. E. (2004). The classical origins of Pavlov's conditioning. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science, 39, 279–294.
10.
DickR. D. (1991). An empirical taxonomy of critical thinking. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 18, 79–92.
11.
DunbarK. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In SternbergR. J. & DavidsonJ., The nature of insight (pp. 365–395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
EnnisR. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In BaronJ. B. & SternbergR. F., Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). New York: Freeman.
13.
FacioneP. A., & FacioneN. (1992). The California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory. Millbrae: California Academic.
14.
HalpernD. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and meta-cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53, 449–455.
15.
HalpernD. F. (2003). Thinking critically about creative thinking. In RuncoM. A., Critical creative processes (pp. 189–207). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
16.
LearyM. L., SheppardJ. A., McNeilM. S., JenkinsT. B., & BarnesB. D. (1986). Objectivism in information utilization: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 32–43.
17.
LeongF., & ZacharP. (1993). Presenting two brief forms of the Scientist–Practitioner Inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 1, 162–170.
18.
LeshowitzB. L., DiCerboK. E., & OkunM. A. (2002). Effects of instruction in methodological reasoning on information evaluation. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 5–10.
19.
MahoneyM. J. (1977). Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 161–175.
20.
McPeckJ. E. (1981). Thinking and education. New York: St Martin's.
21.
PaulR. (1993). The logic of creative and critical thinking. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 21–39.
22.
PerkinsD. N., JayE., TishmanS., RitchbartR., DonisK., & AndradeA. (2000). Intelligence in the wild: A dispositional view of intellectual traits. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 269–293.
23.
RowanV., & BensleyD. A. (2007, March). Cognitive style and interest in psychology: How are they related?Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia.
24.
RuncoM. A., & ChandI. (1994). Problem finding, evaluative thinking, and creativity. In RuncoM. A., Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 40–76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25.
StanovichK. E. (2004). How to think straight about psychology (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
26.
StanovichK. E., & WestR. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161–188.
27.
SternbergR. J. (1985). Critical thinking: Its nature, measurement, and improvement. In LinkF. R., Essays on the intellect (pp. 45–65). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
28.
WeisbergR. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.
29.
YancharS. C., SlifeB. D., & WarneR. (2008). Critical thinking as disciplinary practice. Review of General Psychology, 12, 266–281.
