The authors provide a description of the transition process for visual analytic tools and contrast this with the transition process for more traditional software tools. This paper takes this difference into account and describes a user-oriented approach to technology transition including a discussion of key factors that should be considered and adapted to each situation. The progress made in transitioning visual analytic tools in the past 5 years is described and challenges that remain are enumerated.
National Research Council. (2004) Accelerating Technology Transition: Bridging the Valley of Death for Materials and Processes in Defense Systems. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, p. 2.
2.
RogersE.M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations. 4th edn, New York: The Free Press.
3.
MooreG.A. (1999) Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling Hightech Products to Mainstream Customers. New York: Harper Business.
4.
ChristensenC.M. (2003) The Innovator's Dilemma: The Revolutionary Book that will Change the Way You do Business. New York: Harper Collins.
5.
DavisF.D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
6.
BriggsR.O.NunamakerJ.F.JrTobeyD. (2001) The technology transition model: A key to self-sustaining and growing communities of GSS users. In: DennisE. (ed.) Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS–34), 3–6 January, Maui, HI. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, p. 9.
7.
FowlerP.J.LevineL. (1994) From theory to practice: Technology transition at the SE. In: MudgeT. N.ShiverB. D. (eds.). Proceedings of the 27th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS–27), Vol. IV: Information Systems: Collaboration Technology Organizational Systems and Technology; 4–7 January, Wailea, HI. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 483–497.
8.
MayhewD.J. (1999) The Usability Engineering Lifecycle: A Practitioner's Handbook for User Interface Design. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
9.
RedishJ. (2007) Expanding usability testing to evaluate complex systems. Journal of Usability Studies2(3): 102–111.
10.
BierE.CardS. K.BodnarJ. W. (2007) Entity-based collaboration tools for intelligence analysis. In: RibarskyW.KeimO. (eds.), IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology: VAST 1907; 30 October–1 November. Sacramento, CA. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 99–106.
11.
MaciejewskiR. (2008) Understanding syndromic hotspots–A visual analytics approach. In: EbertD.ErtlT. (eds.), IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology: VAST1908; 21–23 October, Columbus, OH. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. pp. 35–42.
12.
GrinsteinG.O'ConnellT.LaskowskiS.PlaisantC.ScholtzJ.WhitingM. (2006) The VAST 2006 contest: A tale of alderwood. In: WongP.C.KeimO. (eds.), IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology: VAST 1906; 31 October–2 November, Baltimore, MD. New York: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 215–216.
13.
GrinsteinG.PlaisantC.LaskowskiS.O'ConnellT.ScholtzJ.WhitingM. (2007) VAST 2007 Contest: Blue Iguanodon. In: RibarskyW.KeimO. (eds.), IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology: VAST 1907; 30 October–1 November, Sacramento, CA. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 231–232.
14.
GrinsteinG.PlaisantC.LaskowskiS.O'ConnellT.ScholtzJ.WhitingM. (2008) VAST 2008 Challenge: Introducing mini-challenges. In: EbertD.ErtlT. (eds.), IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology: VAST 1908; 21–23 October, Columbus, OH. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 195–196.
15.
WhitingM. A.HaackJ.VarleyC. (2008). Creating realistic, scenario-based synthetic data for test and evaluation of information analytics software. In: BertiniE.PererA.PlaisantC.SantucciG. (eds). Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Information Visualization (BELIV 2008); 5 April, Florence, Italy. New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press, Article No. 8.
16.
ThomasJ. J.CookK. A., (eds.) (2005) Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, p. 172.
17.
VonHippelE. (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science32(7): 791–805.
18.
JeongD.DouW.StukesF.RibarskyW. (2008) Evaluating the relationship between user interaction and financial visual analysis. In: EbertD.ErtlT. (eds.) IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology: VAST 1908; 21–23 October, Columbus, OH. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. pp. 83–90.
19.
PikeW. (2008) The scalable reasoning system: Lightweight visualization for distributed analytics. In: EbertD.ErtlT. (eds.), IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology: VAST 1908; 21–23 October, Columbus, OH. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. pp. 131–138.
20.
McCarthyJ. (1995) Dynamics of Software Development. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.
21.
GladwellM. (2000) The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. New York: Little Brown.
