Visualisations of complex interrelationships have the potential to be complex and require a lot of cognitive input. We have drawn analogues from natural systems to create new visualisation approaches that are more intutive and easier to work with. We use nature-inspired concepts to provide cognitive amplification, moving the load from the user's cognitive to their perceptual systems and thus allowing them to focus their cognitive resources where they are most appropriate. Two systems are presented: one uses a physical-based model to construct the visualisation, while the other uses a biological inspiration. Their application to four visualisation tasks is discussed: the structure of information browsing on the internet; the structure of parts of the web itself; to aid the refinement of queries to a digital library; and to compare different documents for similar content.
NardiBASchianoDJGumbrechtM. Blogging as social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary? In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM Press: Chicago IL, 2004; 222–231.
CardSKMackinlayJDShneidermanB, (Eds). Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think, 1st edn.Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1999.
4.
WünscheB. A survey classification and analysis of perceptual concepts and their application for the effective visualisation of complex information. In: ChurcherNChurcherC (Eds). Australasian Symposium on Information Visualisation, vol. 35. Australian Computer Society: Christchurch, New Zealand, 2004; 17–24.
5.
SchnierTYaoXBealeRHendleyB. Nature inspired creative design – bringing, together ideas from nature, computer science, engineering, art, design. In: ParmeeIC (Ed). Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference (ACDM 2006), The Institute for People Centred Computation, Bristol: UK, 2006; 237–240.
6.
LeeMDReillyREButaviciusMA. An empirical evaluation of Chernoff faces, star glyphs, and spatial visualizations for binary data. In: PattisonTThomasB (Eds). Australian Symposium on Information Visualisation, vol. 24 – ACS Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology.Australian Computer Society: Adelaide, Australia, 2003; 1–10.
7.
MorrisCJEbertDSRhengansP. Experimental Analysis of the Effectiveness of Features in Chernoff Faces. Proceedings of the International Society of Optimal Engineering, SPIE-3905, 2000; 12–17.
8.
BaldonadoMQWWoodruffAKuchinskyA. Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualizations. In: ACM AVI.ACM Press: Palermo, Italy, 2000; 110–119.
9.
CraigPKennedyJ. Coordinated graph and scatter-plot views for the visual exploration of microarray time-series data. In: IEEE InfoVis.IEEE Computer Society Press: Seattle, WA, 2003; 173–180.
10.
KleinPMüllerFReitererHEiblM. Visual information retrieval with the SuperTable + Scatterplot. In: BanissiE (Ed). IEEE Conference on Information Visualisation.IEEE Computer Society Press: London, UK, 2002; 70–75.
11.
RobertsJC. On encouraging multiple views for visualization. In: BanissiEKhosrowshahiFSarfrazM (Eds). IEEE Conference on Information Visualization.IEEE Computer Society Press: London, UK, 1998; 8–14.
12.
RobertsJC. Multiple-view and multiform visualization. In: ErbacherRPangAWittenbrinkCRobertsJ (Eds). Visual Data Exploration and Analysis VII, vol. 3960. SPIE: San Jose, CA, 2000; 176–185.
13.
RossGChalmersM. A visual workspace for hybrid multidimensional scaling algorithms. In: IEEE InfoVis.IEEE Computer Society Press: Seattle, Washington, 2003; 85–90.
14.
SiirtolaH. Combining parallel coordinates with the reorderable matrix. In: Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization.IEEE Computer Society Press: London, UK, 2003; 63–74.
15.
AndrewsKHeideggerH. Information slices: Visualising and exploring large hierarchies using cascading, semi-circular discs. In: IEEE InfoVis, Late Breaking Hot Topics.IEEE Computer Society Press: Research Triangle, NC, 1998; 9–12.
16.
AndrewsKPichlerMWolteJ. Information pyramids: A new approach to visualising large hierarchies. In: Late Breaking Hot Topics, IEEE Visualization.IEEE Computer Society Press: Phoenix, AZ, 1997; 49–52.
17.
BarlowTNevilleP. A comparison of 2-D visualisations of hierarchies. In: AndrewsKRothSWongPC (Eds). IEEE InfoVis.IEEE Computer Society Press: San Diego, CA, 2001; 131–138.
GrahamMKennedyJBHandC. A comparison of set-based and graph-based visualisations of overlapping classification hierarchies. In: GesùVDLevialdiSTarantinoL (Eds). ACM AVI.ACM Press: Palermo, Italy, 2000; 41–50.
20.
GrahamMWatsonMFKennedyJB. Novel visualisation techniques for working with multiple, overlapping classification hierarchies. Taxon2002; 51(2): 351–358.
21.
GranitzerMKienreichWSabolVAndrewsKKlieberW. Evaluating a system for interactive exploration of large hierarchically structured document repositories. In: IEEE InfoVis.IEEE Computer Society Press: Austin, TX, 2004; 127–133.
22.
HuangMLQuanW. 21DF-Browser: A multiple fisheye distortion technique for visualizing and navigating hierarchies with large number of leaves. In: IEEE Conference on Information Visualisation.IEEE Computer Society Press: London, UK, 2004; 277–285.
23.
SongHCurranEPSterrittR. Multiple foci visualisation of large hierarchies with FlexTree. Information Visualization2004; 3(1): 19–35.
24.
AbelloJKobourovSGYusufovR. Visualizing large graphs with Compound-fisheye views and treemaps, In: PachJ (Ed). Graph Drawing (12th International Symposium, GD 2004, New York, NY, USA, September 29–October 2, 2004, Revised Selected Papers, Springer-Verlag: New York City, NY, USA, 2005; 431–441.
25.
AbelloJvan HamF. Matrix zoom: A visual interface to semi-external graphs. IEEE InfoVis.IEEE Computer Society Press: Austin, TX, 2004; 183–190.
CarmelLHarelD. Combining hierarchy and energy for drawing directed graphs. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics2004; 10(1): 46–57.
28.
ChintalapaniGPlaisantCShneidermanB. Extending the utility of treemaps with flexible hierarchy. In: IEEE Conference on Information Visualisation. IEEE Computer Society Press: London, UK, 2004; 335–344.
29.
GhoniemMFeketeJ-DCastagliolaP. A comparison of the readability of graphs using node-link and matrix-based representations. In: IEEE InfoVis.IEEE Computer Society Press: Austin, TX, 2004; 17–24.
30.
GrahamMKennedyJ. Combining linking & focusing techniques for a multiple hierarchy visualisation. In: BanissiEKhosrowshahiFSarfrazMUrsynA (Eds). IEEE Conference on Information Visualization. IEEE Computer Society Press: London, UK, 2001; 425–432.
31.
GrahamMKennedyJ. Exploring and Examining Assessment Data via a Matrix Visualisation. In: ACM AVI.ACM Press: Gallipoli, Lecce, Italy, 2004; 158–162.
32.
SánchezJATwidaleMBNicholsDMSilvaNN. Experiences with starfield visualizations for analysis of library collections. SPIE Visualisation and Data Analysis, vol. 5669. SPIE Press: San Jose, CA, 2005; 215–225.
33.
van HamF. Using multilevel call matrices in large software projects. In: IEEE InfoVis.IEEE Computer Society Press: Seattle, WA, 2003; 227–232.
34.
van HamFvan WijkJJ. Interactive visualization of small world graphs. In: IEEE InfoVis.IEEE Computer Society Press: Austin, TX, 2004; 199–206.
35.
PrykeABealeR. Interactive comprehensible data mining. In: CaiY (Ed). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, LNCS/LNAI 3345. Springer-Verlag: 2005; 48–65.
36.
BrandesU. Layout of graph visualizations. Ph.D Thesis, Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, 1999.
SunLSmithSCaudellTP. FROTH – A Force-directed Representation Of Tree Hierarchies. In: IEEE InfoVis Poster Compendium.IEEE Computer Society Press: Seattle, WA, 2003; 108–109.
39.
BealeR. Supporting serendipity in data mining and information foragingInternational Journal of Human Computer Studies (in press).
40.
BentleyCLWardMO. Animating multidimensional scaling to visualize N-dimensional data sets. In: IEEE Info Vis.IEEE Computer Society Press: San Francisco, CA, 1996; 72–73.
41.
WongPCBergeronRD. Multivariate visualization using metric scaling. In: IEEE Visualization.IEEE Computer Society Press: Phoenix, AZ, 1997; 111–118.
42.
HendleyRJDrewNSWoodABealeR. Narcissus: Visualising information. In: CardSMackinlayJSchneidermanB (Eds). Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think.Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.: Dordrecht, 1999; 503–511.
43.
BenfordSTaylorIBrailsfordDKolevaBCravenMFraserMReynardGGreenhalghC. Three dimensional visualization of the World Wide Web. ACM Computing Surveys1999; 31(4): 25.
44.
ChiEHPitkowJMackinlayJPirolliPGossweilerRCardSK. In: Visualizing the evolution of Web Ecologies. ACM CHI.ACM Press: Los Angeles, CA, 1998; 400–407.
45.
HochheiserHShneidermanB. Understanding Patterns of User Visits to Web Sites: Interactive Starfield Visualizations of WWW Log Data.ASIS: Washington, DC, 1999, 331–344.
46.
RisdenKCzerwinskiMPMunznerTCookDB. An initial examination of ease of use for 2D and 3D information visualizations of web content. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies2000; 53(5): 695–714.
47.
SkogTHolmquistLE. WebAware: Continuous visualization of web site activity in a public space. In: CHI1900 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems.ACM Press: The Hague, Netherlands, 2000; 351–352.
48.
WoodABealeRDrewNSHendleyRJ. HyperSpace: Web Browsing with Visualisation. Third International World-Wide Web Conference Poster Proceedings, Darmstadt Germany, 1995; 21–25.
49.
AmavizcaMSánchezJAAbascalR. Visualization of Large and Complex Information Spaces in the Floristic Digital Library.ENC: Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico, 1999.
50.
JonesS. Graphical query specification and dynamic result previews for a digital library. ACM UIST.ACM Press: San Francisco, CA, 1998; 143–151.
51.
ShneidermanBFeldmanDRoseAGrauXF. Visualizing digital library search results with categorical and hierarchical axes. In: ACM Digital Libraries.ACM Press: San Antonio, TX, 2000; 57–66.
52.
BealeRMcNabRJWittenIH. Visualising sequences of queries: a new tool for information retrieval. In: IEEE Conference on Information Visualisation. IEEE: London, UK, 1997; 57–62.
53.
BealeRPrykeA. Knowledge through Evolution. In: FulcherJ (Ed). Advances in Applied Artificial Intelligence.Idea Group Inc. IGI, 2006; 234–250.
54.
CunninghamS-JHolmesGLittinJBealeRWittenIH. Applying connectionist models to information retrieval. In: AmariS-IKasabovNK (Eds). Brain-Like Computing and Intelligent Information Systems, Chapter 18. Springer Verlag: 1998; 435–457.
55.
PorterMF. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program1980; 14(3): 130–137.
56.
WilkinsB. MELD: a pattern supported methodology for visualisation design, D. Phil thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
57.
CookSM. Visualisation cognitive walkthroughs. Personal communication, Birmingham, 2002.
