Major arts and cultural institutions have expanded their exhibits and programs to reflect society's growing diversity, but we know little about potential neighborhood disparities in arts participation within metropolitan areas and how it varies across institutions and different forms of engagement. Unlike membership, which tends to be ‘market’ driven, museum school tour programs often target underserved schools to engage diverse communities. We provide the first assessment to our knowledge of whether school tours provide a counterweight to more expensive forms of participation and whether ethnic-oriented institutions have been able to overcome the distance that often separates disadvantaged communities from institutions. Our analysis of participation rates for five major institutions in Los Angeles, California, indicates that, despite progress, barriers persist. Although affluent areas provide an important membership base, school tours offer a valuable tool for attracting traditional and ethnic-specific audiences and communities. The results support greater integration of city and cultural planning and suggest that institutions should redouble efforts to overcome sociocultural and geographic barriers.
AndersonDPiscitelliB, 2002, “Parental recollections of childhood museum visits”Museum National1026–27
2.
AngI, 2005, “The predicament of diversity: Multiculturalism in practice at the art museum”Ethnicities5305–320
3.
ApparicioPSeguinA-M, 2006, “Measuring the accessibility of services and facilities for residents of public housing in Montreal”Urban Studies43187–211
4.
ApparicioPSeguinA-MNaudD, 2008, “The quality of the urban environment around public housing buildings in Montreal: An objective approach based on GIS and multivariate statistical analysis”Social Indicators Research86355–380
5.
Arts Education Partnership, 1999Champions of Change: The Impact of the Arts on LearningArts Education Partnership, Washington, DC
BanksP A, 2010, “Black cultural advancement: Racial identity and participation in the arts among the black middle class”Ethnic and Racial Studies33272–289
8.
BartelsL M, 1996, “Pooling disparate observations”American Journal of Political Science40905–942
9.
BassF MWittinkD R, 1975, “Pooling issues and methods in regression analysis with examples in marketing research”Journal of Marketing Research12414–425
10.
BerryN W, 1998, “A focus on art museum/school collaborations”Art Education518–14
11.
BhattacharyaC B, 1998, “When customers are members: Customer retention in paid membership contexts”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science2631–44
12.
BhattacharyaC BRaoHGlynnM A, 1995, “Understanding the bond of identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members”Journal of Marketing5946–57
13.
BlumenbergE, 2004, “En-gendering effective planning: Spatial mismatch, low-income women, and transportation policy”Journal of the American Planning Association70269–281
14.
BoehmM, 2011, “LACMA's bond rating drops to A3”Los Angeles Times, 15 August
15.
BoterJRouwendalJWedelM, 2005, “Employing travel time to compare the value of competing cultural organizations”Journal of Cultural Economics2919–33
16.
BourdieuP, 1984Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
17.
Brennan-HorleyCGibsonC, 2009, “Where is creativity in the city? Integrating qualitative and GIS methods”Environment and Planning A412595–2614
18.
BrookOBoylePFlowerdewR, 2010, “Geographic analysis of cultural consumption”, in Spatial and Social Disparities Eds StillwellJNormanPThomasCSurridgePSpringer, Berlin)
19.
CliffordJ, 1997Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
20.
CurridE, 2007The Warhol Economy: How Fashion, Art, and Music Drive New York City (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
21.
de GraaffTBoterJRouwendalJ, 2009, “On spatial differences in the attractiveness of Dutch museums”Environment and Planning A412778–2797
22.
DeWittJMartinS, 2008, “A short review of school field trips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future”Visitor Studies11181–197
23.
DiMaggioPOstrowerF, 1990, “Participation in the arts by black and white Americans”Social Forces68753–778
24.
DowneySDelamatreJJonesJ, 2007, “Measuring the impact of museum—school programs: Findings and implications for practice”Journal of Museum Education32175–188
25.
EvansGFoordJ, 2008, “Cultural mapping and sustainable communities: Planning for the arts revisited”Cultural Trends1765–96
26.
FalkJ HDierkingL D, 1997, “School field trips: Assessing their long-term impact”Curator: The Museum Journal40211–218
27.
FreyB S, 1998, “Superstar museums: An economic analysis”Journal of Cultural Economics22. 113–125
28.
GibsonCBrennan-HorleyCWarrenA, 2010, “Geographic information technologies for cultural research: Cultural mapping and the prospects of colliding epistemologies”Cultural Trends19325–348
29.
GladstoneM, 1985, “State Senate approves Museum of Tolerance, sends bill to Assembly”Los Angeles Times 24 March
30.
GlynnM ABhattacharyaC BRaoH, 1996, “Art museum membership and cultural distinction: Relating members' perceptions of prestige to benefit usage”Poetics24260–274
31.
GriffinJ, 2004, “Research on students and museums: Looking more closely at the students in school groups”Science Education88S59–S70
32.
GrodachC, 2010, “Beyond Bilbao: Rethinking flagship cultural development and planning in three California cities”Journal of Planning Education and Research29353–366
33.
HaselhoffKOngP, 2005, “Museum attendance, population shifts, and changing tastes”, Ralph and Goldy Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies, Los Angeles, CA
34.
HoustonDWuJOngPWinerA, 2004, “Structural disparities of urban traffic in southern California: Implications for vehicle-related air pollution exposure in minority and high-poverty neighborhoods”Journal of Urban Affairs25565–592
35.
James Irvine Foundation, 2006, “Critical issues facing the arts in California”, working paper, James Irvine Foundation, San Francisco, CA
36.
Los Angeles County Arts Commission, 2004, “Arts for all: Los Angeles County regional blueprint for arts education”, Los Angeles County Arts Commission, Los Angeles, CA
37.
Loukaitou-SiderisAGrodachC, 2004, “Displaying and celebrating the ‘other’: A study of the mission, scope, and roles of Ethnic Museums in Los Angeles”The Public Historian2649–71
38.
MarkusenAGawdaA, 2010, “Arts and culture in urban or regional planning: A review and research agenda”Journal of Planning Education and Research29379–391
39.
McCarthyK FJinnettK J, 2001A New Framework for Building Participation in the Arts (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA)
40.
McCarthyK FOndactjeE HZakarasL, 2001Guide to the Literature on Participation in the Arts (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA)
41.
MondscheinABlumenbergETaylorB, 2010, “Accessibility and cognition: The effect of transport mode on spatial knowledge”Urban Studies47845–866
42.
National Endowment for the Arts, 2009, “2008 Survey of public participation in the arts” RR49, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC
43.
OdoFOngP, 2007, “Art and cultural institutions and AAPI communities”aapi nexus5v–xi
44.
OngP MMillerD, 2005, “Spatial and transportation mismatch in Los Angeles”Journal of Planning Education and Research2543–56
45.
PaswanA KTroyL C, 2004, “Non-profit organization and membership motivation: An exploration in the museum industry”Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice121–15
46.
RajaSMaCYadavP, 2008, “Beyond food deserts; measuring and mapping racial disparities in neighborhood food environments”Journal of Planning Education and Research27469–482
47.
RodrigueJ-PComtoisCSlackB, 2006The Geography of Transportation (Routledge, New York)
48.
SchusterJ M, 2000The Geography of Participation in the Arts and Culture: A Research Monograph Based on the 1997 Survey of Public Participation in the Arts (Seven Locks Press, Santa Ana, CA)
49.
StoneD L, 1992, “A descriptive study of the art museum relative to schools”Visual Arts Research1851–61
