Territorial cohesion is a shared EU competence, but what is territory? This paper seeks to alert planners—in particular those involved in European spatial planning—that common-sense answers do not necessarily apply: it is not a container. A view of macrospace as filled with territories-as-containers—territorialism—is nonetheless the basis for common misunderstandings about the EU, and also about European planning, now being articulated in terms of territorial cohesion. Leaving the container view behind means that control over territories—territoriality—must be negotiated, something that relational regionalism also suggests. The planning literature is beginning to absorb such views, articulating soft rather than hard forms of planning for ‘soft spaces’. Hard planning is bound to continue, but it will be embedded in new practices, including the conceptualisation of multiple visions on territory.
AgnewJ, 1994, “The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory”Review of International Political Economy1(1) 5380
2.
AlexanderER (Ed.), 1996, “Planning doctrine”Planning Theory special issue 169101
3.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG, 2009a, “Critical reflections on spatial planning”Environment and Planning A4125442549
4.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG, 2009b, “Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway”Environment and Planning A41617633
5.
AminA, 2004, “Regions unbound: Towards a new politics of place”Geografiska Annaler, Series B863344
6.
AminAMasseyDThriftN, 2003Decentering the Nation: A Radical Approach to Regional Inequality (Catalyst, London)
7.
AntonsichM, 2011a, “Rethinking territory”Progress in Human Geography35422425
8.
AntonsichM, 2011b, “Grounding theories of place and globalisation”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie102331345
9.
BadieB, 1995La fin des territoires: Essai sur le désordre international et sur l'utilité du2011b respect (Fayard, Paris)
BurgessMVollaardH, 2006, “Introduction: Analysing Westphalian states in an integrating Europe and a globalising world”, in State Territoriality and European Integration Eds BurgessMVollaardH (Routledge, London) pp 114
20.
CastellsM, 2000The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age—Economy, Society and Culture Volume I2nd edition (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA)
21.
ChadwickGA, 1971A Systems View of Planning (Pergamon, Oxford)
22.
ClarkJJonesA, 2008, “The spatialities of Europeanisation: Territory, government and power in ‘Europe’”Transactions of the British Institute of Geographers, New Series33300318
23.
Committee on Qualifications of Planners, 1950Schuster Report (HMSO, London)
24.
ConzelmannT, 2008, “Efficient and legitimate? Reflections on multi-level governance”, in Multilevel Governance in the European Union: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead Eds ConzelmannTSmithR (Nomos, Baden-Baden) pp 1130
25.
CoopSThomasH, 2007, “Planning doctrine as an element in planning history: The case of Cardiff”Planning Perspectives22167193
26.
CotellaGAdamsNBunesRJ, 2012, “Engaging in European spatial planning: A Central and Eastern European perspective on the territorial cohesion debate”European Planning Studies doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.673567
27.
DavoudiS, 2007, “Territorial cohesion, the European social model, and spatial policy research, in Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society Ed. FaludiA (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA) pp 81104
28.
DavoudiSStrangeI (Eds), 2009Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning (Routledge, London)
29.
DeasILordA, 2006, “From new regionalism to an unusual regionalism? The emergence of nonstandard regional spaces and lessons for the territorial reorganisation of the state”Urban Studies4318471877
30.
DelantyGRumfordC, 2005Rethinking Europe: Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization (Routledge, London)
31.
DührSColombCNadinV, 2010European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation (Routledge, London)
32.
EldenS, 2010, “Land, terrain, territory”Progress in Human Geography34799817
33.
EversD, 2008, “Reflections on territorial cohesion and European spatial planning”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie99303315
34.
European Commission, 1999European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg)
35.
2001European Governance: A White Paper Communication from the Commission, COM (2001) 428, Brussels
36.
2004Communication from the Commission: A New Partnership for Cohesion—Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion, COM/2004/107 (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg)
37.
2008Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee: Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion—Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength COM (2008) 616, Brussels, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0616:FIN:EN:PDF
EversD, 2008, “Reflections on territorial cohesion and European spatial planning”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie99303315
40.
FaludiA, 1973, “The systems view and planning theory”Socio-Economic Planning Science76777
41.
FaludiA, 2004, “Spatial planning traditions in Europe: Their role in the ESDP process”International Planning Studies9(2–3), 157172
42.
FaludiA, 2007, “Territorial cohesion policy and the European model of society”European Planning Studies15567583
43.
FaludiA, 2008, “The learning machine: European integration in the planning mirror”Environment and Planning A4014701484
44.
FaludiA, 2010Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? (Routledge, London)
45.
FaludiA, 2012a, “Territorial cohesion and subsidiarity under the EU treaties: A critique of the ‘territorialism’ underlying”Regional Studies iFirst, doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.657170
46.
FaludiA, 2012b, “Multi-level (territorial) governance: Three criticisms”Planning Theory and Practice13(2) 115
47.
FaludiAvan der ValkAJ, 1994Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht)
48.
FaludiAWaterhoutB, 2002The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No Masterplan (Routledge, London)
49.
FriedmannJ, 1994, “The utility of non-Euclidean planning”Journal of the American Planning Association60377379
50.
GrahamSHealeyP, 1999, “Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice”European Planning Studies7623646
GoodstadtV, 2009, “Working across boundaries”Town and Country Planning78(3) 8
53.
GuellecA, 2009, “Préface: Aménagement du territoire et cohésion territoriale dans l'Union européenne”, in L'Europe: Aménager les Territoires Eds JeanYBaudelleG (Armand Collin, Paris)
54.
HainsworthP, 2008The Extreme Right in Western Europe (Routledge, London)
55.
HajerMA, 2009Authoritative Governance: Policy-making in the Age of Mediatization (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
56.
HarrisonJ, 2013, “Configuring the new ‘regional world’ on being caught between territory and networks”Regional Studies425574
57.
HarrisonJGroweA, 2012, “From places to flows? Planning for the new ‘regional world’ in Germany”European Urban and Regional Studies iFirst, 1–21, doi:10.1177/0969776412441191
58.
HarveyD, 1969Explanation in Geography (Edward Arnold, London)
59.
HaughtonGAllmendingerPCounsellDVigarG, 2010The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries (Routledge, London)
60.
HealeyP, 2010Making Better Places: The Planning Project in the Twenty-first Century (Palgrave Macmillan, London)
61.
HerschelT, 2010Borders in Post-Socialist Europe: Territory, Scale, Society (Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey)
62.
HoogheLMarksG, 2001Multilevel Governance and European Integration (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD)
63.
HoogheLMarksG, 2003, “Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multilevel governance”American Political Science Review97233243
64.
HoogheLMarksG, 2010, “Types of multi-level governance”, in Handbook on Multilevel Governance Eds EnderleinHWältiSZürnM (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 1731
65.
Janssen-JansenLBHuttonTA, 2011, “Reconfiguring the governance structures of the twenty-first century city-region: Observation and conclusions”International Planning Studies16305312
66.
JessopB, 1997, “A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes”, in Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy, Ed. LauriaM (Sage, London) pp 5173
67.
JessopB, 2000, “The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the ecological dominance of globalizing”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24323360
68.
JessopBBrennerNJonesM, 2008, “Theorising sociospatial relations”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26389401
69.
JonasAEG, 2012, “Region and place: Regionalism in question”Progress in Human Geography36263272
70.
JonesAClarkJ, 2010The Spatialities of Europeanization: Power, Governance and Territory in Europe (Routledge, London)
71.
Kohler-KochBRittbergerB, 2006, “Review article: The governance turn in EU studies”Journal of Common Market Studies442749
72.
Levy-FaurD, 2012The Oxford Handbook on Governance (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
73.
LoriauxM, 2008European Union and the Deconstruction of the Rhineland Frontier (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
74.
LukacsJ, 2010The Legacy of the Second World War (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
75.
McLoughlinJB, 1969Urban and Regional Planning: A Systems Approach (Faber and Faber, London)
76.
MahonRKeilR, 2009, “Introduction”, in Leviathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale Eds KeilRMahonR (UBC Press, Vancouver) pp 323
77.
MamadouhV, 2001, “The territoriality of European integration and the territorial features of the European Union: The first 50 years”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie92420436
78.
MarksG, 1992, “Structural policy in the European Community”, in Euro-politics: Institutions and Policymaking in the “New” European Community Ed. SbragiaA M (The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC) pp 191224
79.
MarksGHoogheL, 2004, “Contrasting visions of multi-level governance”, in Multi-level Governance Eds BacheIFlindersM (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 1530
80.
MasseyD, 1984, “Introduction: Geography matters”, in Geography Matters! A Reader, Eds MasseyDAllenJ (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 111
81.
MetzgerJSchmittP, 2012, “When soft spaces harden: The EU strategy for the Baltic Sea Region”Environment and Planning A44263280
82.
MurphyAB, 2008, “Rethinking multi-level governance in a changing European Union: Why metageography and territoriality matter”GeoJournal72(1–2) 718
83.
PerkmannM, 2007, “Construction of new territorial scales: A framework and case study of the EUREGIO cross-border region”Regional Studies41253266
84.
PeyronyJ, 2007, “Territorial cohesion and the European model of society”, in Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society Ed. FaludiA (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA) pp 6179
85.
PeyronyJDenertO, 2012, “Planning for cross-border territories: The role played by spatial information”Raumforschung und Raumordnung doi:10.1007/s13147-012-0156-0
86.
RifkinJ, 2004The European Dream: How Europe's Vision of the Future Is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream (Tarcher, New York)
87.
RobbG, 2007The Discovery of France (Picador, London)
88.
RobertJStummTVetJMReinckeGJHollandersMFigueroMA, 2001Spatial Impacts of Community Policies and the Costs of Non-coordination (European Commission, Brussels)
89.
RoodbolRHvan der ValkAJJAltesKorthals WK, 2012, “The Netherlands spatial planning doctrine in disarray in the 21st century”Environment and Planning A44377395
90.
RosenauJN, 2004, “Strong demand, huge supply: Governance in an emerging epoch”, in Multi-level Governance Eds BacheIFlindersM (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 3148
91.
RossG, 1995Jacques Delors and European Integration (Polity Press, Cambridge)
92.
SabelCFZeitlinJ, 2010, “Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU”, in Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture Eds SabelCFZeitlinJ (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 128
93.
SackRT, 1984, “The societal conception of space”, in Geography Matters! A Reader Eds MasseyDAllenJ (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 3447
94.
SackRD, 1986Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
95.
ScholteJA, 2000Globalization: A Critical Introduction (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
96.
ShacharA, 1998, “Reshaping the map of Israel: A new national planning doctrine”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science555209218
97.
SojaEW, 1971, “The organization of space”, resource paper 8, Commission on College Geography, Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC
98.
SteadD, 2011, “European macroregional strategies: Indications of spatial rescaling? (Policy & Planning Brief)”Planning Theory and Practice12163167
99.
SykesO, 2011, “Investigating sub-state interpretations of European territorial cohesion: The case of the United Kingdom”International Planning Studies16377396
Territorial Agenda 2020, 2011Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions; agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19th May 2011, Gödöllö, Hungaryhttp://www.eu2011.hu/files/bveu/documents/TA2020.pdf
102.
van HoutumH, 2005, “The geopolitics of borders and boundaries”Geopolitics10672679
103.
Vaughan-WilliamsN, 2011, “Off-shore biopolitical border security: The EU's global response to migration, piracy, and ‘risky’ subjects’”, in Europe in the World: EU Geopolitics and the Making of European Space Ed. BialasiewiczL (Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey) pp 185200
104.
VidalM-JNiedermeyerM, 2011, “La développement territorial et sa dimension transfrontalière—expériences du Luxembourg et la Grand Région”, in Raumordnung in Luxemburg/Aménagement du Territoire au Luxembourg Eds SchulzCChillaT (Editions Guy Binsfeld, Luxemburg) pp 297316
105.
WaterhoutB, 2008The Institutionalisation of European Spatial Planning (IOS Press, Amsterdam)
106.
WesternJ, 2012Cosmopolitan Europe: A Strasbourg Self-portrait (Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey)
107.
ZonneveldW, 2005, “Multiple visioning: New ways of constructing transnational spatial visions”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy234162
