With this paper I aim to shed light on the attempts that have been made to adjust Finnish policy making to the changes in the global technoeconomic environment, as well as to the meta-rationales behind the evolving cluster-flavoured innovation (CFI) policies. Policy learning is discussed with reference to the main cluster and innovation policy changes in Finland and related conceptual development. My main aim is to paint an overall picture of Finnish CFI polices and learning related to them as well as to analyse how efforts to redesign the policies have been unfolding over the past twenty years. This paper is based on (a) secondary data (ie, earlier studies and reports on the Finnish cluster and innovation policies) and (b) data from two empirical studies.
Ali-YrkköJHermansR, 2002, “Nokia in the Finnish innovation system”, DP 811, The Research Institute Of The Finnish Economy, Yliopistopaino, Helsinki
2.
AsheimB TGertlerM, 2005, “The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems”, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Eds FagerbergJMoweryDNelsonR (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 291–317
3.
AsheimB TBoschmaRCookePDahlstrand-LindholmALaredaPPiccalugaA, 2006Constructing Regional Advantage: Principles, Perspectives, Policies. Final ReportDG Research, European Commission, Brussels
4.
AsheimBIsaksenAMoodyssonJSotarautaM2011, “The changing and diverse roles of RIS in the globalizing knowledge economy: A theoretical re-examination with illustrations from the Nordic countries”, in Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation and Innovation Eds BatheltHFeldmanM PKoeglerD F (Routledge, London) pp 227–249
5.
BoschmaRSotarautaM, 2007, “Economic policy from an evolutionary perspective: The case of Finland”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management7156–173
6.
EdquistC, 2005, “Systems of innovation”, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Eds FagerbergJMoweryD CNelsonR R (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 181–208
7.
EdquistCLuukkonenTSotarautaM, 2009, “Broad-based innovation policy”, in Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System: Full Report (Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki University Print, Helsinki) pp 11–54
8.
Finland University Act, 2009, Yliopistolaki, 558/2009 Finnish Regional Development Act, 2002, aluekehitys laki 602/2002
9.
FlanaganKUyarraELaranjaM, 2011, “Reconceptualising the ‘policymix’ for innovation”Research Policy40702–713
10.
GeorghiouLSmithKToivanenOYlä-AnttilaP, 2003Evaluation of the Finnish Innovation Support System Publications 5/2003, Ministry of Trade and Industry, Helsinki
11.
HamelGVälikangasL, 2003, “The quest for resilience”Harvard Business Review September, reprint, 1–13
12.
Häyrinen-AlestaloMPelkonenATeräväinenTWaltariS-T, 2006, “Integrating regional policy with technology policy: The experience of Finland”Fennia1843–17
13.
HermansRKulvikMYlä-AnttilaP, 2005, “International mega-trends and growth prospects of the Finnish biotechnology industry: Recent economic research and policy implications”Journal of Commercial Biotechnology11134–145
14.
HernesniemiHLammiMYlä-AnttilaP, 1995Kansallinen kilpailukyky ja teollinen tulevaisuus [National competitiveness and industrial future]Etla/Sitra, Helsinki
15.
HonkapohjaSKoskelaE, 1999, “The economic crisis of the 1990's in Finland”Economic Policy14400–436
16.
JääskeläinenJ, 2001Klusteri tieteen ja politiikan välissä: Teollisuuspolitiikasta yhteiskuntapolitiikkaan Etla A:33, Etla, Helsinki
17.
JensenMJohnsonBLorenzELundvallB-Å, 2007, “Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation”Research Policy36680–693
18.
KaitilaVKotilainenM, 2008, “Not just Nokia: Finland”, in Small Country Innovation Systems Eds EdquistCHommenL (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 355–402
19.
Kansallinen teollisuusstrategia1993 [National industrial strategy] report 1/1993, Kauppa- ja teollisuusministeriö, Helsinki
20.
KuitunenSKutinlahtiP, 2007, “Johdanto: Miten lähestyä osaamiskeskusohjelman lisäar voa muuttuvassa politiikkaympäristössä?”, in Osaamisklusterit innovaatioyhteisöjen rakentajina: Näkökulmia osaamiskeskus ohjel man lisäarvoon Eds KuitunenSNiinikoskiM-L (Oske, Helsinki) pp 7–16
21.
LaranjaMUyarraEFlanaganK, 2008, “Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting”Research Policy37823–835
LundvallB A, 2007, “National innovation system: Analytical focusing device and policy learning tool”, WP 2007:004, Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies, Stockholm
25.
LundvallB-ÅBorrásS, 2005, “Science, technology, and innovation policy”, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Eds FagerbergJMoweryD CNelsonR R (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 591–631
MiettinenR, 2002National Innovation System: Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric (Edita, Helsinki)
28.
Ministry of Employment and the Economy, 2008Proposal for Finland's National Innovation StrategyHelsinki Ministry of Employment and the Economy, 2009, “Government's Communication on Finland's National Innovation Strategy to the Parliament”, http://www.tem.fi/files/21010/National_Innovation_Strategy_March_2009.pdf
29.
MytelkaL KSmithK, 2002“Policy learning and innovation theory: An interactive and co-evolving process”Research Policy311467–1479
30.
NikulainenTTahvanainenA-J, 2009, “Towards demand based innovation policy? The introduction of SHOKS as innovation policy instrument”, DP 1182, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Etla, Helsinki
31.
NiosiJSaviottiPBellonBCrowM, 1993, “National systems of innovation: In search of workable concepts”Technology in Society15207–227
32.
PelkonenAKonttinenJOksanenJValovirtaVBoekholtPLeväsluotoJ, 2010, “Osaamisklusterit alueiden voimien yhdistäjänä: Osaamiskeskusohjelman (2007–2013) väiarviointi”, innovation 44/2010, MEE Publications, Helsinki
33.
PeterG BPierreJ, 1998, “Governance without government? Rethinking public administration”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8223–243
34.
PorterM E, 1990The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Macmillan, London)
35.
PorterM E, 2000, “Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy”Economic Development Quarterly1415–34
36.
PowellW W, 1990, “Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization”Research in Organizational Behavior12295–336
37.
Rodríguez-PoseA, 1999, “Innovation prone and innovation averse societies: Economic performance in Europe”Growth and Change3075–105
38.
RoelandtT J Aden HertogP, 1999, “Cluster analysis and cluster-based policy-making: The state of the art”, in Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach (OECD, Paris) pp 413–427
39.
RomanainenJ, 2001, “The cluster approach in Finnish technology policy”, in Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems (OECD, Paris) pp 377–388
40.
RouvinenPYlä-AnttilaP, 2003, “Finnish cluster studies and new industrial policy making”, in Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach (OECD, Paris) pp 361–380
SchienstockGHämäläinenT, 2001Transformation of the Finnish Innovation System: A Network Approach Sitra Reports series 7 (Hakapaino Oy, Helsinki)
43.
SotarautaMKautonenM, 2007, “Co-evolution of the Finnish national and local innovation and science arenas: Towards a dynamic understanding of multi-level governance”Regional Studies411085–1098
44.
SotarautaMKosonenK-J, forthcoming, “Customized innovation policies and the regions: Digital content services and intelligent machinery in Finland”European Urban and Regional Studies
45.
SotarautaMRamstedt-SenTSeppänenSKosonenK J, 2011, “Digital or local buzz; global or national pipelines: Patterns of knowledge sourcing in intelligent machinery and digital content services in Finland”European Planning Studies191305–1330
46.
SotarautaMHorlingsILiddleJ, 2012, “Leadership and sustainable regional development”, in Leadership and Change in Sustainable Regional Development Eds SotarautaMHorlingsILiddleJ (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon) pp 1–19
47.
StokerG, 2000, “Urban political science and the challenge of urban governance”, in Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy Ed. PierreJ (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 91–109
48.
StoneC N, 1993, “Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach”Journal of Urban Affairs151–28
49.
SuorsaK, 2007, “Regionality, innovation policy and peripheral regions in Finland, Sweden and Norway”Fennia: International Journal of Geography18515–29
50.
TahvanainenA-JNikulainenT, 2010Tutkimusympäristö muutoksessa: Tutkijoiden näkemykset SHOK:n, korkeakoulukeksintölain ja yliopistolain vaikutuksista Research Institute of the Finnish Economy Discussion papers (Elta, Helsinki)
51.
TulkkiP, 2001, “The Finnish way to the information society: Expanding engineer educations”European Journal of Engineering Education2639–52
52.
VeugelersRAigingerKEdquistCBreznitzDMurrayGOttavianoGHyytinenAKangasharjuAKetokiviMLuukkonenTMalirantaMMaulaMOkkoPRouvinenPSotarautaMTanayamaTToivanenOYlä-AnttilaP, 2009Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System: Policy Report (Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki University Print, Helsinki)
