This paper presents an analysis of contradictions in urban low carbon transitions as engines of change. Following Kojève's reading of contradiction in Hegel's oeuvre, I argue that contradiction is a constitutive feature of low carbon interventions. This is an alternative to conventional readings of contradiction as a provisional encounter of opposites in which one will eventually cancel out the other. I unpack the concept of contra diction in three ways: first, by displaying a Hegelian-inspired understanding of contradiction in relation to change, time, and desire; second, by explaining how inherent contradictions can also be read in relation to the excesses that characterize the deployment of methods of calculation in low carbon interventions; and third, by situating these contradictions within the overall dynamics of carbon governance and purposive attempts to bring about a low carbon transition. The paper explores the practical implications of this analysis in a case of low carbon interventions in social housing in Ljubljana, Slovenia. The case study shows that, if contradictions are at the heart of low carbon interventions, contradiction analysis may provide a direction towards broader reconfigurations of social and technological practices and generate a desire to change.
BäckstrandKLövbrandE (2006) “Planting trees to mitigate climate change: contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism”. Global Environmental Politics6: 50–75
5.
BatailleG (1985) “Base materialism and gnosticism”. In: StoeklA (eds) Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927–1939, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 45–52
6.
BatailleG (1991) The Accursed Share, Volume 1: Consumption, New York: Zone Bookstranslated by R Hurley
7.
BelayB (1997) “That obscure parallel to the dialectic: tangled lines between Bataille and Kojève”. Parallax3: 55–69
8.
BetsillM MBulkeleyH (2006) “Cities and the multilevel governance of global climate change”. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations12: 141–159
9.
BulkeleyH (2010) “Cities and the governing of climate change”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources35: 229–253
10.
BulkeleyHCastán BrotoV (2012) “Urban experiments and climate change: securing zero carbon development in Bangalore”. Contemporary Social Science9: 393–414
11.
BulkeleyHCastán BrotoV (2013) “Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series38: 361–375
12.
BulkeleyHCastán BrotoVEdwardsG (2014) An Urban Politics of Climate Change: Experimentation and the Governing of Socio-technical Transitions, London: Routledge
13.
Castán BrotoV (2012) “Social housing and low carbon transitions in Ljubljana, Slovenia”. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions2: 82–97
14.
Castán BrotoVBulkeleyH (2013) “A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities”. Global Environmental Change23: 92–102
15.
Castán BrotoVBulkeleyH (2014) “Maintaining experiments and the material agency of the urban”. In: McFarlaneCGrahamSDesaiR (eds) Infracity, London: Routledge, pp. 199–218
16.
ChiversD (2012) Climate Change Denial, Oxford: New Internationalist Public
17.
CirmanAMandicSSiterM (2012) “Slovenia: do energy efficiency policies influence the quality of housing?”. In: NieboerNTzenkovaSGruisVvan HalA (eds) Energy Efficiency in Housing Management, London: Routledge, pp. 195–209
18.
ClarkBYorkR (2005) “Carbon metabolism: global capitalism, climate change, and the biospheric rift”. Theory and Society34: 391–428
19.
CollinsA B (2000) “Hegel's unresolved contradiction: experience, philosophy, and the irrationality of nature”. Dialogue39: 771–796
20.
CooperB (1984) The End of History: An Essay on Modern Hegelianism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
21.
Corfee-Morlot J, Kamal-Chaoui L, Donovan M, Cochran I, Robert A, Teasdale P-J, 2009, “Cities, climate change and multilevel governance”, OECD Environmental working paper 14, OECD, Paris
22.
DemerittD (2001) “The construction of global warming and the politics of science”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers91: 307–337
23.
DodmanD (2009) “Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories”. Environment and Urbanization21: 185–201
24.
EvansJ (2011) “Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series36: 223–237
25.
GartmanD (2004) “Three ages of the automobile: the cultural logics of the car”. Theory, Culture, and Society21: 169–174
26.
GeroulanosS (2011) “Heterogeneities, slave-princes, and Marshall plans: Schmitt's reception in Hegel's France”. Modern Intellectual History8: 531–560
27.
GrantJ (2010) “Foucault and the logic of dialectics”. Contemporary Political Theory9: 220–238
28.
Greening LornaAGreeneD LDifiglioC (2000) “Energy efficiency and consumption—the rebound effect—a survey”. Energy Policy28: 389–401
29.
Grgic T, 2009, “Performance report Ljubljana”, Intelligent Energy Europe, Renewable Energy and Building Exhibitions of the Enlarged Europe, Ljubljana
30.
GroysB (2012) Introduction to Antiphilosophy, London: Verso
31.
GuthmanJDuPuisM (2006) “Embodying neoliberalism: economy, culture, and the politics of fat”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24: 427–448
32.
HahnS S (2007) Contradiction in Motion: Hegel's Organic Concept of Life and Value, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
HaughtonGMcManusP (2012) “Neoliberal experiments with urban infrastructure: the Cross City Tunnel, Sydney”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research36: 90–105
35.
HodsonMMarvinS (2010) “Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were?”. Research Policy39: 477–485
36.
HoffmannM J (2011) Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto, Oxford: Oxford University Press
37.
HoldenELinnerudK (2011) “Troublesome leisure travel: the contradictions of three sustainable transport policies”. Urban Studies48: 3087–3106
38.
HollierD (1997) “About some books which Bataille did not write”. Parallax3: 71–78
39.
ICLEI, 2010, “Local government operations protocol for the quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions inventories”, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, New York
40.
JarczykGLabarrièreP-J (1996) De Kojève à Hegel: 150 ans de pensée hégélienne en France, Paris: Albin Michel
41.
JasanoffSMartelloM L (2004) Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
42.
JohnsonL (2010) “The fearful symmetry of Arctic climate change: accumulation by degradation”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28: 828–847
43.
KaikaM (2006) City of Flows: Modernity, Nature and the City, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge
44.
KojèveA (1946) “Hegel, Marx et le christianisme”. Critique3: 339–366
45.
KojèveABloomAlan (1969) Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit. Assembled by Raymond Queneau, New York: Basic Bookstranslated by J H Nichols Jr
46.
KojèveA (1982) Outline of a Phenomenology of Right, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefieldtranslated by B-P Frost, R Howse
47.
KojèveA (2000) “Tyranny and wisdom”. In: GourevitchVRothM S (eds) Leo Strauss: On Tyranny, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 135–176
48.
KojèveA (2004) La notion de l'autorite, Paris: Éditions Gallimard
49.
LastA (2013) “Negotiating the inhuman: Bakhtin, materiality and the instrumentalization of climate change”. Theory, Culture, and Society30: 60–83
50.
LiT M (2007) The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press
51.
MutersbaughT (2004) “Serve and certify: paradoxes of service work in organic-coffee certification”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22: 533–552
52.
NicholsJ H (2007) Alexandre Kojève: Wisdom at the End of History, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield
O'ConnorJ (1991) “On the two contradictions of capitalism”. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism2: 107–109
55.
O'ConnorJ (1996) “The second contradiction of capitalism”. In: BentonT (eds) The Greening of Marxism, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 197–221
56.
O'HaraS U (1996) “Discursive ethics in ecosystems valuation and environmental policy”. Ecological Economics16: 95–107
57.
PatersonMStrippleJ (2010) “My Space: governing individuals' carbon emissions”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28: 341–362
58.
PrudhamS (2009) “Pimping climate change: Richard Branson, global warming, and the performance of green capitalism”. Environment and Planning A41: 1594–1613
59.
RiceJ L (2010) “Climate, carbon, and territory: greenhouse gas mitigation in Seattle, Washington”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers100: 929–937
60.
Richards M, 2003, “Poverty reduction, equity and climate change: global governance synergies or contradictions?” Overseas Development Institute, London
61.
RiggK (2013) “Letter from the Chair”. Momentum for Change, Bonn: United Nations Climate Change Secretariat
62.
RothM S (1991) “Natural right and the end of history: Leo Strauss and Alexandre Kojève”. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale96: 407–422
63.
RutherfordJ (2011) “Rethinking the relational socio-technical materialities of cities and ICTs”. Journal of Urban Technology18: 21–33
64.
SeyfangG (2010) “Community action for sustainable housing: building a low-carbon future”. Energy Policy38: 7624–7633
65.
ShepherdsonC (1999) “The epoch of the body: need and demand in Kojève and Lacan”. In: WeissGHaberH (eds) Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersections of Nature and Culture, New York: Routledge, pp. 183–211
66.
SimsC (2012) “From hostility to hope: Beauvoir's joyful turn to Hegel in The Ethics of Ambiguity”. South African Journal of Philosophy31: 676–691
67.
SlocumR (2004) “Consumer citizens and the Cities for Climate Protection campaign”. Environment and Planning A36: 763–782
68.
SmithA (2010) “Community-led urban transitions and resilience: performing Transition Towns in a city”. In: BulkeleyHCastán BrotoVHodsonMMarvinS (eds) Cities and Low Carbon Transitions, London: Routledge, pp. 159–177
69.
SmithAStirlingABerkhoutF (2005) “The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions”. Research Policy34: 1491–1510
70.
StoeklA (1997) “The future of the end of history”. Parallax3: 29–40
UN–Habitat (2011) Global Report on Human Settlements: Cities and Climate Change, London: Earthscan
73.
WhileA (2013) “The carbon calculus and transitions in urban politics and political theory“. In: BulkeleyHCastán BrotoVHodsonMMarvinS (eds) Cities and Low Carbon Transitions, London: Routledge, pp. 42–53
74.
WhileAJonasA E GGibbsD (2010) “From sustainable development to carbon control: eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series35: 76–93
75.
WhiteheadM (2013) “Neoliberal urban environmentalism and the adaptive city: towards a critical urban theory and climate change”. Urban Studies50: 1348–1367
76.
YusoffK (2009) “Excess, catastrophe, and climate change”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27: 1010–1029
