We report three behavioral experiments on the spatial characteristics evoking illusory face and letter detection. False detections made to pure noise images were analyzed using a modified reverse correlation method in which hundreds of observers rated a modest number of noise images (480) during a single session. This method was originally developed for brain imaging research, and has been used in a number of fMRI publications, but this is the first report of the behavioral classification images. In Experiment 1 illusory face detection occurred in response to scattered dark patches throughout the images, with a bias to the left visual field. This occurred despite the use of a fixation cross and expectations that faces would be centered. In contrast, illusory letter detection (Experiment 2) occurred in response to centrally positioned dark patches. Experiment 3 included an oval in all displays to spatially constrain illusory face detection. With the addition of this oval the classification image revealed an eyes/nose/mouth pattern. These results suggest that face detection is triggered by a minimal face-like pattern even when these features are not centered in visual focus.
AhumadaAJr, 1996“Perceptual classification images from Vernier acuity masked by noise”Perception261831–1840
2.
AndrewsT JSchluppeckDHomfrayDMatthewsPBlakemoreC, 2002“Activity in the Fusiform Gyrus predicts conscious perception of Rubin's vase-face illusion”NeuroImage17890–901 doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1243
3.
BentinSAllisonTPuceAPerezEMcCarthyG, 1996“Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience8551–565 doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551
4.
BinderJSwansonSHammekeTMorrisGMuellerWFischerMBenbadisSFrostJ ARaoS MHaughtonV M, 1996“Determination of language dominance using functional MRI”Neurology46978–984
5.
CampanellaSHanoteauCDépyDRossionBBruyerRCrommelinckMGuéritJ M, 2000“Right N170 modulation in a face discrimination task: an account for categorical perception of familiar faces”Psychophysiology37796–806 doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3760796
6.
DamasioA RGeschwindN, 1984“The neural basis of language”Annual Review of Neuroscience7127–147 doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.07.030184.001015
7.
DayanPAbbottL F, 2001Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
8.
EllisH DShepherdJ WDaviesG M, 1979“Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition”Perception8431–439 doi:10.1068/p080431
FairhallS LIshaiA, 2007“Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception”Cerebral Cortex172400–2406 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl148
11.
FisetDBlaisCArguinMTadrosKEthier-MajcherCBubDGosselinF, 2009“The spatio-termporal dynamics of visual letter recognition”Cognitive Neuropsychology2623–35 doi:10.1080/02643290802421160
12.
GeschwindNLevitskyW, 1968“Human brain: left-right asymmetries in temporal speech region”Science161186–187 doi:10.1126/science.161.3837.186
13.
GilbertCBakanP, 1973“Visual asymmetry in perception of faces”Neuropsychologia11355–362 doi:10.1016/0028-3932(73)90049-3
GosselinFSchynsP G, 2001“Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks”Vision Research412261–2271 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00097-9
GosselinFSpezioM LTranelDAdolphsR, 2010“Asymmetrical use of eye information from faces following unilateral amygdala damage”Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience61–8
18.
HansenB CThompsonBHessR FEllembergD, 2010“Extracting the internal representation of faces from human brain activity: An analogue to reverse correlation”NeuroImage51373–390 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.021
19.
HassonUHendlerTBen-BashatDMalachR, 2001“Vase or face? A neural correlate of shape-selective grouping processes in the human brain”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience13744–753 doi:10.1162/08989290152541412
20.
HayD C, 1981“Asymmetries in face processing: evidence for a right hemisphere perceptual advantage”The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology33267–274
21.
HelligeJ BCorwinW HJonssonJ E, 1984“Effects of perceptual quality on the processing of human faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance1090–107 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.1.90
22.
HeronW, 1957“Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention”The American Journal of Psychology7038–48 doi:10.2307/1419227
23.
IshaiA, 2008“Let's face it: It's a cortical network”NeuroImage40415–419 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.040
24.
JonesJ PPalmerL A, 1987“The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex”Journal of Neurophysiology581187–1211
25.
KanwisherNYovelG, 2006“The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences3612109–2128 doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1934
26.
KanwisherNMcDermottJChunM M, 1997“The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception”Journal of Neuroscience174302–4311
27.
KontsevichL LTylerC W, 2004“What makes Mona Lisa smile?”Vision Research441493–1498 doi:10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.027
28.
Le GrandRMondlochC JMaurerDBrentH P, 2001“Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing”Nature410890–890 doi:10.1038/35073749
29.
LevineS CKoch-WeserM P, 1982“Right hemisphere superiority in the recognition of famous faces”Brain and Cognition110–22 doi:10.1016/0278-2626(82)90003-3
30.
LevineS CBanichM TKoch-WeserM P, 1988“Face recognition: a general or specific right hemisphere capacity?”Brain and Cognition8303–325 doi:10.1016/0278-2626(88)90057-7
31.
LewisM BEdmondsA J, 2003“Face detection: Mapping human performance”Perception32903–920 doi:10.1068/p5007
32.
LiJLiuJLiangJZhangHZhaoJHuberD ERiethC ALeeKTianJShiG, 2009“A distributed neural system for top-down face processing”Neuroscience Letters4516–10 doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.12.039
33.
LiJLiuJLiangJZhangHZhaoJRiethCAHuberD ELiWShiGAiLTianJLeeK, 2010“Effective connectivities of cortical regions for top-down face processing: a dynamic causal modeling study”Brain Research134040–51 doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.044
34.
LindsayRLeaJ ANosworthyG JFulfordJ AHectorJLeVanVSeabrookC, 1991“Biased lineups: Sequential presentation reduces the problem”Journal of Applied Psychology76796–802 doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.796
35.
LiuJLiJZhangHRiethC AHuberD ELiWLeeKTianJ, 2010“Neural correlates of top-down letter processing”Neuropsychologia48636–641 doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.024
36.
LiuJLiJRiethC AHuberD ETianJLeeK, 2011“A dynamic causal modeling analysis of the effective connectivities underlying top-down letter processing”Neuropsychologia
37.
McCandlissB DCohenLDehaeneS, 2003“The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus”Trends in Cognitive Sciences7293–299 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00134-7
38.
MishkinMForgaysD G, 1952“Word recognition as a function of retinal locus”Journal of Experimental Psychology4343–48 doi:10.1037/h0061361
39.
MovshonJThompsonITolhurstD, 1978“Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex”The Journal of Physiology28353–57
40.
O'CravenK MKanwisherN, 2000“Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience121013–1023 doi:10.1162/08989290051137549
41.
RaynerKWellA DPollatsekA, 1980“Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading”Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics27537–544
42.
RhodesG, 1985“Lateralized processes in face recognition”British Journal of Psychology76249–271 doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01949.x
43.
RingachD LShapleyR, 2004“Reverse correlation in neurophysiology”Cognitive Science28147–166 doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2802_2
44.
RobertshawSSheldonM, 1976“Laterality effects in judgment of the identity and position of letters: a signal detection analysis”The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology28115–121 doi:10.1080/14640747608400544
45.
RossionBJoyceC ACottrellG WTarrM J, 2003“Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex”NeuroImage201609–1624 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.010
46.
SacksO W, 1985The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales (New York, NY: Touchtone)
47.
SchynsP GBonnarLGosselinF, 2002“Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information”Psychological Science13402–409 doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00472
48.
SergentJ, 1984“Configural processing of faces in the left and the right cerebral hemispheres”Journal of Experimental Psychology10554–572
49.
SergentJOhtaSMacDonaldB, 1992“Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing: A Positron Emission Tomography study”Brain11515–36 doi:10.1093/brain/115.1.15
50.
SmithF WMuckliLBrennanDPernetCSmithM LBelinPGosselinFHadleyD MCavanaghJSchynsP G, 2008“Classification images reveal the information sensitivity of brain voxels in fMRI”NeuroImage401643–1654 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.029
51.
SmithM LFriesPGosselinFGoebelRSchynsP G, 2009“Inverse mapping the neuronal substrates of face categorizations”Cerebral Cortex192428–2438 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn257
52.
SvobodaE, 2007“Faces, faces everywhere”The New York Times page D1
53.
TjanB SNandyA S, 2006“Classification images with uncertainty”Journal of Vision6387–413 doi:10.1167/6.4.8
54.
WengerM JCopelandA MBittnerJ LThomasR D, 2008“Evidence for criterion shifts in visual perceptual learning: Data and implications”Perception & Psychophysics701248–1273 doi:10.3758/PP.70.7.1248
55.
YovelGLevyJGraboweckyMPallerK A, 2003“Neural correlates of the left-visual-field superiority in face perception appear at multiple stages of face processing”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience15462–474 doi:10.1162/089892903321593162
56.
YovelGTambiniABrandmanT, 2008“The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces”Neuropsychologia463061–3068 doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.017
57.
ZhangHLiuJHuberD ERiethC ATianJLeeK, 2008“Detecting faces in pure noise images: a functional MRI study on top-down perception”NeuroReport19229–233 doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f49083
