The question of whether defocus blur is a quantitative cue for depth perception is a topic of renewed interest. A recent study suggests that relative defocus blur can be used in computing depth throughout the visual field, particularly in regions where disparity loses precision. However, elements of the study's experimental design and theoretical analysis appear to undermine this claim. First, the study did not provide evidence that blur can be used as a quantitative depth cue. It only measured blur discrimination thresholds, not perceived depth from for blur. Second, the study's conceptualization of the complementary use of blur and disparity, and related conjectures, are based on the specific viewing geometry and fixation distance tested. They do not appear to generalize to natural viewing situations and tasks. I suggest a different way in which defocus blur might affect depth perception. Because depth-of-focus blur is a cue to egocentric distance, it could contribute to quantitative depth perception by scaling depth relations specified by other relative depth cues.
BlakemoreC. (1970). The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man. Journal of Physiology, 211, 599–622. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(70)90060-X.
2.
BurgeJ.GeislerW. S. (2011). Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 108, 16849–16854. doi:10.1073/pnas.1108491108.
3.
HeldR. T.CooperE. A.BanksM. S. (2012). Blur and disparity are complementary cues to depth. Current Biology, 22, 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.033.
4.
HowardI. P.RogersB. J. (2002). Seeing in depth (Vol. 2). Toronto: I Porteus.
5.
MarshallJ. A.BurbeckC. A.ArielyD.RollandJ. P.MartinK. E. (1996). Occlusion edge blur: a cue to relative visual depth. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 13, 681–688. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.13.000681.
6.
MatherG.SmithD. R. R. (2002). Blur discrimination and its relation to blur-mediated depth perception. Perception, 31, 1211–1219. doi:10.1068/p3254.
7.
PalmisanoS.GillamB.GovanD. G.AllisonR. S.HarrisJ. M. (2010). Stereoscopic perception of real depths at large distances. Journal of Vision, 10(6), 1–16. doi:10.1167/10.6.19.
8.
ToddJ. T.ChristensenJ. C.GuckesK. M. (2010). Are discrimination thresholds a valid measure of variance for judgments of slant from texture?Journal of Vision, 10(2), 20 (1–18). doi:10.1167/10.2.20.
9.
VishwanathD. (2007). Is focal blur an absolute cue to depth? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9), 845. doi:10.1167/7.9.845.
10.
VishwanathD. (2010). Information in surface and depth perception: reconciling pictures and reality. In AlbertazziL.Van TonderG.VishwanathD. (Eds.), Beyond inference. Cambridge: MIT Press.
11.
VishwanathD.BlaserE. (2010). Retinal blur and the perception of egocentric distance. Journal of Vision, 10(10), 26 (1–16). doi:10.1167/10.10.26.
12.
VishwanathD.HibbardP. (2009). Blur, distance, and the perception of plastic depth. Perception, 38(suppl), 153. doi:10.1167/10.7.42.
13.
WalshG.CharmanW. N. (1988). Visual sensitivity to temporal change in focus and its relevance to the accommodation response. Vision Research, 28, 1207–1221. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(88)90037-5.
14.
WangB.CiuffredaK. J.IrishT. (2006). Equiblur zones at the fovea and near retinal periphery. Vision Research, 46, 3690–3698. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.005.
15.
WatsonA. B.AhumadaA. J. (2011). Blur clarified: a review and synthesis of blur discrimination. Journal of Vision, 11(5). doi:10.1167/11.5.10.