Previous research has shown that perceived facial valence is biased toward
background valence. Here, we examine whether background dominance also affects
perceived facial dominance. In particular, we hypothesized that
downward-pointing triangles, which are known to convey threat, would affect
perceived facial dominance. Participants judged perceived facial dominance of
neutral faces presented overlaid on downward- or upward-pointing background
triangles. Our results show that neutral faces are indeed judged more dominant
when seen with a downward-pointing triangle in the background. The fact that
simple geometric background shapes can affect facial judgments may have
important implications for the design and experience of our daily environment
and multimedia content.
AronoffJ.WoikeB.
A., & HymanL.
M. (1992).
Which are the stimuli in facial displays of anger and
happiness? Configurational bases of emotion recognition.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
62(6),
1050–1066.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1050
2.
BallewC.
C., & TodorovA.
(2007). Predicting political elections from
rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences,
104(46),
17948–17953.
doi:10.1073/pnas.0705435104
3.
BarrettL.
F.MesquitaB.,
& GendronM.
(2011). Context in emotion
perception. Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 20(5),
286–290.
doi:10.1177/0963721411422522
4.
BlairI.
V.JuddC.
M., & ChapleauK.
M. (2004).
The influence of Afrocentric facial features in criminal
sentencing. Psychological Science,
15(10),
674–679.
doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00739.x
5.
de
GelderB.MeerenH. K. M.RighartR.van denS. J.van de RietW.
A., & TamiettoM.
(2006). Beyond the face: exploring rapid
influences of context on face processing. Progress
in Brain Research, 155,
37–48.
doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55003-4
6.
FinkB.NeaveN.,
& SeydelH.
(2007). Male facial appearance signals physical
strength to women. American Journal of Human
Biology, 19(1),
82–87. doi:10.1002/ajhb.20583
7.
FloweH.
D. (2012).
Do characteristics of faces that convey trustworthiness and
dominance underlie perceptions of criminality?PLoS ONE, 7(6),
e37253–7
8.
KojiS.,
& FernandesM.
(2010). Does it matter where we meet? The role
of emotional context in evaluative first impressions.
Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,
64(2),
107–116. doi:10.1037/a0019139
9.
LarsonC.
L.AronoffJ.SarinopoulosI.
C., & ZhuD.
C. (2009).
Recognizing threat: A simple geometric shape activates neural
circuitry for threat detection. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 21(8),
1523–1535.
doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21111
10.
LeeT. H.ChoiJ.
S., & ChoY.
S. (2012).
Context modulation of facial emotion perception differed by
individual difference. PLoS One,
7(3), e32987 (1–6).
doi:10.1177/0963721411422522
11.
LittleA.
C.BurrissR. P.JonesB.
C., & RobertsS.
C. (2007).
Facial appearance affects voting decisions.
Evolution and Human Behavior,
28(1), 18–27.
doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.09.002
12.
LundqvistD.EstevesF.,
& ÖhmanA.
(2004). The face of wrath: The role of features
and configurations in conveying social threat.
Cognition & Emotion,
18(2),
161–182.
doi:10.1080/02699930244000453
13.
OosterhofN.
N., & TodorovA.
(2008). The functional basis of face
evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America,
105(32),
11087–11092.
doi:10.1073/pnas.0805664105
14.
RighartR.,
& de
GelderB.
(2008). Recognition of facial expressions is
influenced by emotional scene gist. Cognitive,
Affective, & Behavioural Neuroscience,
8(3), 264–272.
doi:10.3758/CABN.8.3.264
15.
TodorovA.MandisodzaA. N.GorenA.,
& HallC.
C. (2005).
Inferences of competence from faces predict election
outcomes. Science,
308(5728),
1623–1626.
doi:10.1126/science.1110589
16.
TodorovA.PakrashiM.,
& OosterhofN.
N. (2009).
Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time
exposure. Social Cognition,
27(6),
813–833.
doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813
17.
TracyJ.
L., & RobinsR.
W. (2008).
The automaticity of emotion recognition.
Emotion, 8(1),
81–95.
doi:10.1037/1528-3542.8.1.81
