The coplanar ratio principle proposes that when the luminance range in an image is larger than the canonical reflectance range of 30:1, the lightness of a target surface depends on the luminance ratio between that target and its adjacent coplanar neighbor (Gilchrist, 1980). This conclusion is based on experiments in which changes in the perceived target depth produced large changes in its perceived lightness without significantly altering the observers' retinal image. Using the same paradigm, we explored how this depth effect on lightness depends on display complexity (articulation), proximity of the target to its highest coplanar luminance and spatial distribution of fields of illumination. Importantly, our experiments allowed us to test differing predictions made by the anchoring theory (Gilchrist et al., 1999), the coplanar ratio principle, as well as other models. We report three main findings, generally consistent with anchoring theory predictions: (1) Articulation can substantially increase the depth effect. (2) Target lightness depends not on the adjacent luminance but on the highest coplanar luminance, irrespective of its position relative to the target. (3) When a plane contains multiple fields of illumination, target lightness depends on the highest luminance in its field of illumination, not on the highest coplanar luminance.
AdelsonE. H. (2000). Lightness perception and lightness illusions. In GazzanigaM. (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed.; pp. 339–351). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
2.
AdelsonE. H.PentlandA. P. (1996). The perception of shading and reflectance. In KnillD.RichardsW. (Eds.), Perception as Bayesian inference (pp. 409–423). New York: Cambridge University Press
3.
AllredS. R.BrainardD. H. (2009). Contrast, constancy, and measurements of perceived lightness under parametric manipulation of surface slant and surface reflectance. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 26(4), 949–961. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.26.000949
4.
AllredS. R.BrainardD. H. (2013). A Bayesian model of lightness perception that incorporates spatial variation in the illumination. Journal of Vision, 13(7), 1–18. doi:10.1167/13.7.18
AnnanV.GilchristA. (2004). Lightness depends on immediately prior experience. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 943–952. doi:10.3758/BF03194986
7.
ArendL. E. (1994). Surface colors, illumination, and surface geometry: Intrinsic-image models of human color perception. In GilchristA. L. (Ed.), Lightness, brightness and transparency (pp. 159–213). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
8.
ArendL. E.GoldsteinR. (1987). Simultaneous constancy, lightness, and brightness. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4, 2281–2286. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.4.002281
9.
BeckJ. (1965). Apparent spatial position and the perception of lightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 170–179. doi:10.1037/h0021571
10.
BergstromS. S. (1977). Common and relative components of reflected light as information about the illumination, colour, and three-dimensional form of objects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18, 180–186. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00275.x
11.
BlakesleeB.McCourtM. E. (2003). A multiscale spatial filtering account of brightness phenomena. In HarrisL.JenkinM. (Eds.), Levels of perception (pp. 47–72). New York: Springer
12.
BlakesleeB.McCourtM. E. (2004). A unified theory of brightness contrast and assimilation incorporating oriented multiscale filtering and contrast normalization. Vision Research, 44, 2483–2503. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.05.015
13.
BlojM.KerstenD.HurlbertA. C. (1999). Perception of three-dimensional shape influences colour perception through mutual illumination. Nature, 402, 877–879. doi:10.1038/47245
14.
BlojM.RipamontiC.MthaK.GreenwaldS.HauckR.BrainardD. H. (2004). An equivalent illuminant model for the effect of surface slant on perceived lightness. Journal of Vision, 4, 735–746. doi:10.1167/4.9.6
15.
BoyaciH.DoerschnerK.MaloneyL. T. (2004). Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity. Journal of Vision, 4, 664–679. doi:10.1167/4.9.1
16.
BoyaciH.DoerschnerK.MaloneyL. T. (2006). Cues to an equivalent lighting model. Journal of Vision, 6, 106–118. doi:10.1167/6.2.2
17.
BoyaciH.MaloneyL. T.HershS. (2003). The effect of perceived surface orientation on perceived surface albedo in binocularly viewed scenes. Journal of Vision, 3, 541–553. doi:10:1167/3.8.2
18.
BrainardD. H.LongereP.DelahuntP. B.FreemanW. T.KraftJ. M.XiaoB. (2006). Bayesian model of human color constancy. Journal of Vision, 6, 1267–1281. doi:10.1167/6.11.10
19.
BrainardD. H.MaloneyL. T. (2011). Surface color perception and equivalent illumination models. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 1–18. doi:10.1167/11.5.1
20.
BressanP.Actis-GrossoR. (2006). Simultaneous lightness contrast on plain and articulated surrounds. Perception, 35, 445–452. doi:10.1068/p5247
21.
BurzlaffW. (1931). Methodologische beitrage zum problem der farbenkonstanz. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 119, 177–235
22.
CataliottiJ.GilchristA. (1995). Local and global processes in surface lightness perception. Perception and Psychophyiscs, 57(2), 125–135. doi:10.3758/BF03206499
23.
CornsweetT. N. (1970). Visual perception. New York: Academic Press
24.
EconomouE.AnnanV.GilchristA. L. (1998). Contrast depends on anchoring in perceptual groups. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 39(4), S857
25.
EfronB.TibshiraniR. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC
26.
EpsteinW. (1961). Phenomenal orientation and perceived achromatic color. Journal of Psychology, 52, 51–53. doi:10.1080/00223980.1961.9916503
27.
FlockH. R.FreedbergE. (1970). Perceived angle of incidence and achromatic surface color. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 251–256. doi:10.3758/BF03210216
28.
GibbsT.LawsonR. B. (1974). Simultaneous brightness contrast in stereoscopic space. Vision Research, 14, 983–987. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(74)90167-9
29.
GilchristA. (2006). Seeing black and white. Oxford: Oxford University Press
30.
GilchristA. L. (1977). Perceived lightness depends on perceived spatial arrangement. Science, 195, 185. doi:10.1126/science.831266
31.
GilchristA. L. (1980). When does perceived lightness depend on perceived spatial arrangement?Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 527–538. doi:10.3758/BF03198821
32.
GilchristA. L.AnnanV. (2002). Articulation effects in lightness: Historical background and theoretical implications. Perception, 31, 141–150. doi:10.1068/p04sp
33.
GilchristA. L.DelmanS.JacobsenA. (1983). The classification and integration of edges as critical to the perception of reflectance and illumination. Perception and Psychophysics, 33, 425–436. doi:10.3758/BF03202893
34.
GilchristA.KossyfidisC.BonatoF.AgostiniT.CataliottiJ.LiX.EconomouE. (1999). An anchoring theory of lightness perception. Psychological Review, 106, 795–834. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.795
35.
GogelW. C.MershonD. H. (1969). Depth adjacency in simultaneous contrast. Perception and Psychophysics, 5(1), 13–17. doi:10.3758/BF03210471
36.
HennemanR. (1935). A photometric study of the perception of object color. Archives of Psychology, 179, 5–88
37.
HochbergJ. E.BeckJ. (1954). Apparent spatial arrangement and perceived brightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 263–266. doi:10.1037/h0056283
38.
HoweP. D. (2006). Testing the coplanar ratio hypothesis of lightness perception. Perception, 35(3), 291–301. doi:10.1068/p5461
39.
JamesonD.HurvichL. M. (1964). Theory of brightness and color contrast in human vision. Vision Research, 4, 135–154. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(64)90037-9
40.
JuleszB. (1971). Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. doi:10.1002/bs.3830170307
41.
KardosL. (1934). Ding und Schatten: Eine experimentelle Untersuchung über die Grundlagen des Fabensehens. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 23
42.
KatzD. (1935). The world of colour. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co
43.
KingdomF.MouldenB. (1992). A multi-channel approach to brightness coding. Vision Research, 32(8), 1565–1582. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(92)90212-2
KoffkaK. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co
46.
KozakiA. (1973). Perception of lightness and brightness of achromatic surface color and impression of illumination. Japanese Psychological Research, 15, 194–203
47.
KraftJ. M.MaloneyS. I.BrainardD. H. (2002). Surface-illuminant ambiguity and color constancy: Effects of scene complexity and depth cues. Perception, 31, 247–263. doi:10.1068/p08sp
48.
LandE. H.McCannJ. J. (1971). Lightness and retinex theory. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 61, 1–11. doi:10.1117/12.805474
49.
LogvinenkoA.MenshikovaG. (1994). Trade-off between achromatic colour and perceived illumination as revealed by the use of pseudoscopic inversion of apparent depth. Perception, 23(9), 1007–1023. doi:10.1068/p231007
50.
LottoR. B.PurvesD. (1999). The effects of color on brightness. Nature Neuroscience, 2(11), 1010–1014. doi:10.1038/14808
51.
MachE. (1886). The analysis of sensations. New York: Dover
52.
MaloneyL. T.SchirilloJ. A. (2002). Color constancy, lightness constancy, and the articulation hypothesis. Perception, 31(2), 135–139. doi:10.1068/p12sp
53.
MarrD. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman
54.
OyamaT. (1968). Stimulus determinants of brightness constancy and the perception of illumination. Japanese Psychological Research, 10(3), 146–155
55.
PessoaL.MingollaE.ArendL. E. (1996). The perception of lightness in 3-D curved objects. Perception and Psychophysics, 58(8), 1293–1305. doi:10.3758/BF03207560
56.
RadonjićA.AllredS. R.GilchristA. L.BrainardD. H. (2011). The dynamic range of human lightness perception. Current Biology, 21(22), 1931–1936. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.013
57.
RadonjićA.TodorovićD.GilchristA. (2010). Adjacency and surroundedness in the depth effect on lightness. Journal of Vision, 10(9), 1–16. doi:10.1167/10.9.12
58.
ReddingG. M.LesterC. F. (1980). Achromatic color matching as a function of apparent target orientation, target and background luminance, and lightness or brightness instructions. Perception and Psychophysics, 27, 557–563. doi:10.3758/BF03198685
59.
ReidC. R.Jr.ShapleyR. (1988). Brightness induction by local contrast and the spatial dependence of assimilation. Vision Research, 28(1), 115–132. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(88)80012-9
60.
RipamontiC.BlojM.HauckR.MithaK.GreenwaldS.MaloneyS. I.BrainardD. H. (2004). Measurements of the effect of surface slant on perceived lightness. Journal of Vision, 4(9), 747–763. doi:10.1167/4.9.7
61.
RobinsonA. E.HammonP. S.de SaV. R. (2007). Explaining brightness illusions using spatial filtering and local response normalization. Vision Research, 47, 1631–1644. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.017
62.
RuddM. (2010). How attention and contrast gain control interact to regulate lightness contrast and assimilation: A computational neural model. Journal of Vision, 10(14), 40. doi:10.1167/10.14.40
63.
RuddM. E.ZemachI. K. (2004). Quantitative properties of achromatic color induction: An edge integration analysis. Vision Research, 44(10), 971–981. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.004
64.
SchirilloJ.ReevesA.ArendL. (1990). Perceived lightness, but not brightness, of achromatic surfaces depends on perceived depth information. Perception and Psychophysics, 48(1), 82–90. doi:10.3758/BF03205014
65.
SchirilloJ. A.ArendL. E. (1995). Illumination change at a depth edge can reduce lightness constancy. Perception and Psychophysics, 57(2), 225–230. doi:10.3758/BF03206509
66.
ShapiroA.LuZ. L. (2011). Relative brightness in natural images can be accounted for by removing blurry content. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1452–1459. doi:10.1177/0956797611417453
67.
TayaR.EhrensteinW. H.CavoniusC. R. (1995). Varying the strength of the Munker-White effect by stereoscopic viewing. Perception, 24(6), 685–694. doi:10.1068/p240685
68.
WallachH. (1948). Brightness constancy and the nature of achromatic colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 310–324. doi:10.1037/h0053804
69.
WishartK. A.FrisbyJ. P.BuckleyD. (1997). The role of 3-D surface slope in a lightness/brightness effect. Vision Research37, 467–473. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00104-6
70.
YangJ. N.MaloneyL. T. (2001). Illuminant cues in surface color perception: Tests of three candidate cues. Vision Research, 41, 2581–2600. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00143-2
71.
ZdravkovićS.EconomouE.GilchristA. (2012). Grouping illumination frameworks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 776–784. doi:10.1037/a0026335