Symmetry and complexity both affect the aesthetic judgment of abstract patterns. However, although beauty tends to be associated with symmetry, there are indications that small asymmetries can also be beautiful. We investigated the influence of small deviations from symmetry on people's aesthetic liking for abstract patterns. Breaking symmetry not only decreased patterns' symmetry but also increased their complexity. While an increase of complexity normally results in a higher liking, we found that even a small decrease of symmetry has a strong effect, such that patterns with slightly broken symmetries were significantly less liked than fully symmetric ones.
BerlyneD. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 279–286. doi:10.3758/BF03212593
2.
JacobsenT.HöfelL. (2002). Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: Analyses of individual judgments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 755–766. doi:10.2466/PMS.95.7.755
3.
LederH.AugustinD.BelkeB. (2005). Art and cognition! Consequences for experimental aesthetics. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 5(2), 11–20.
4.
LederH.BelkeB.OeberstA.AugustinD. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508. doi:10.1348/0007126042369811
5.
McManusI. C. (2005). Symmetry and asymmetry in aesthetics and the arts. European Review, 13(Supp. No. 2), 157–180. doi:10.1017/S1062798705000736
6.
SilviaP. J. (2006). Artistic training and interest in visual art: Applying the appraisal model of aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 24, 139–161. doi:10.2190/DX8K-6WEA-6WPA-FM84
7.
SilviaP. J.BrownE. M. (2007). Anger, disgust, and the negative aesthetic emotions: Expanding an appraisal model of aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 100–106. doi:10.1037/1931–3896.1.2.100
8.
TinioP. P. L.LederH. (2009). Just how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry, complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization. Acta Psychologica, 130, 241–250. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.01.001
