A rarely explored subset of territorial disputes is that of domestic-level territorial disputes. In such a dispute, a substate group disagrees with the country's central government over whether the government should have sovereign control over the entire territory of the state; that is, the dissatisfied group is demanding independence. If the independence-minded group prevails, new boundaries and states are created through a territorial change known as secession. This study explores secession's track record (i.e., how often secessions have been successful in resolving the underlying territorial disputes) and reasons why some secessions are followed by militarized conflict over the new boundary. The results—based on an examination of the aftermath of all twentieth century secessions and the application of more sensitive criteria than those used in prior research—reveal that while most secessions leave unresolved territorial disputes in their wake, these disputes are not particularly prone to escalate into militarized confrontations. Moreover, intangibly (i.e., ethnically) based disagreements over the new boundary play a much greater role in militarized conflict onset than do tangibly (i.e., economically or strategically) based territorial disputes. Finally, contrary to expectations from the ethnic secession literature, peaceful secessions significantly decrease the likelihood that the new boundary will be contested militarily.
Anderson, E.W.1999. Geopolitics: International boundaries as fighting places . The Journal of Strategic Studies22: 125-136.
3.
Beck, N.1998. Modelling space and time: The event history approach . In E. Scarbrough and E. Tanenbaum, eds. Research strategies in social sciences . London: Oxford University Press .
4.
Bennett, D.S., and A.C. Stam.2000. EUGene: A conceptual manual. International Interactions26: 179-204.
5.
Box-Steffensmeier, J.M., and B.S. Jones.2004. Event history Modeling: A guide for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bremer, S.1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution36: 309-338.
7.
Brooks, S.G.1999. The globalization of production and the changing benefits of conquest. Journal of Conflict Resolution43: 646-670.
8.
Brown, M. E., ed. 1993. Ethnic conflict and international security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
Carment, D.1997. Modeling ethnic conflict: Problems and pitfalls . Politics and the Life Sciences16: 249-251.
10.
Cooley, J.K.1984. The war over water. Foreign Policy Spring: 3-26.
de Silva, K.M., and R.J. May.1991. Internationalization of ethnic conflict . New York: St. Martin's Press .
13.
Diehl, P.F.1999. Territorial disputes. In L. Kurz, ed. Encyclopedia of violence, peace, and conflict, volume 1. San Diego: Academic Press .
14.
Esman, M.J.1997. One size cannot fit all: The case for flexibility in managing ethnic conflicts. Politics and the Life Sciences16: 251-252.
15.
Etzioni, A.1992. The evils of self-determination. Foreign Policy89: 21-35.
16.
Fraser, T.G.1984. Partition in Ireland, India, and Palestine: Theory and practice. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
17.
Ghosn, F., G. Palmer, and S. Bremer.2004. The MID3 data set, 1993-2001: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science21: 133-154.
18.
Gochman, C.S., and R.J. Leng.1983. Realpolitik and the road to war. International Studies Quarterly27: 97-120.
19.
Gochman, C.S., and Z. Maoz.1984. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1976: Procedures, patterns, and insights. Journal of Conflict Resolution28: 585-616.
20.
Goertz, G., and P.F. Diehl.1992. Territorial changes and international conflict. London: Routledge.
21.
Goldstein, J.S., and J.R. Freeman.1990. Three-way street: Strategic reciprocity in world politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Gottman, J.1973. The significance of territory. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
23.
Gulick, E.V.1955. Europe's classical balance of power. New York: W.W. Norton.
24.
Gurr, T.R.1993. Minorities at risk: A global view of ethnopolitical conflicts . Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
25.
Gurr, T.R., 2000. Peoples versus states: Minorities at risk in the new century . Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.
26.
Hachey, T.E.1972. The problem of partition: Peril to world peace . Chicago: Rand McNally.
27.
Hensel, P.1999. Charting a course to conflict: Territorial issues and interstate conflict, 1816-1992. In P. F. Diehl, ed. A road map to war: Territorial dimensions of international conflict. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
28.
Hensel, P.2000. Territory: Theory and evidence on geography and conflict . In J. Vasquez, ed. What do we know about war?New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
29.
Hensel, P.2001. Contentious issues and world politics: The management of territorial claims in the Americas, 1816-1992. International Studies Quarterly45: 81-109.
30.
Holsti, K.J.1991. Peace and war: Armed conflicts and international order 1648-1989. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Horowitz, D.L.1985. Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
32.
Huth, P.1996. Standing your ground: Territorial disputes and international conflict. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
33.
Huth, P., and T. Allee.2002. The democratic peace and territorial conflict in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Jaggers, K., and M.G. Marshall.2005. Polity IV Project, <http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/>.
35.
James, C.C., and P. James.1997. Solomon, sovereignty, and ethnic conflict . Politics and the Life Sciences16: 252-254.
36.
Kaldor, M.1996. Balkan carve-up. New Statesman & Society9: 24-25.
37.
Kaufmann, C.1996. Possible and impossible solutions to ethnic civil wars . International Security20: 136-175.
38.
Kaufmann, C.1998. When all else fails: Ethnic population transfers and partitions in the twentieth century. International Security23: 120-156.
39.
Keohane, R.O., and J.S. Nye.1977. Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
40.
Kirby, A.M., and M.D. Ward.1987. The spatial analysis of peace and war . Comparative Political Studies20: 293-313.
41.
Kocs, S.1995. Territorial disputes and interstate war, 1945-1987 . Journal of Politics57: 159-175.
42.
Kumar, R.1997. The troubled history of partition. Foreign Affairs76: 22-34.
43.
Levy, J.L.2000. Loss aversion, framing effects, and international conflict: Perspectives from prospect theory. In M. I. Midlarski, ed. Handbook of war studies II. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press .
44.
Long, J.S.1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
45.
Lund, M.1996. Preventing violent conflicts: A strategy for preventative diplomacy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
46.
Mackinder, H.1919. Democratic ideals and reality. New York, NY: H. Holt and Company.
47.
Mandel, R.1980. Roots of modern interstate border disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution24: 427-454.
48.
Mansbach, R.W., and J. Vasquez.1981. In search of theory: A new paradigm for global politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
49.
Maoz, Z.1989. Joining the club of nations: Political development and international conflict, 1816- 1976. International Studies Quarterly33: 199-231.
50.
Maoz, Z.2000. Alliances: The street gangs of world politics. In J. Vasquez, ed. What do we know about war?New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
51.
McGarry, J., and B. O'Leary eds. 1993. The politics of ethnic conflict regulation: Case studies of protracted ethnic conflicts. New York, NY: Routledge.
52.
Mearsheimer, J.J.1993. Shrink Bosnia to save it. The New York Times, 31 March.
53.
Mearsheimer, J.J.1998. A peace agreement that's bound to fail. The New York Times, 19 October.
54.
Mearsheimer, J.J., and S. Van Evera .1995. The partition that dare not speak its name: When peace means war. The New Republic , 5 December.
55.
Mearsheimer, J.J., and S. Van Evera .1996. Partition is the inevitable solution for Bosnia. International Herald Tribune, 25 September.
56.
Mearsheimer, J.J., and S. Van Evera .1999. Redraw the map, stop the killing. The New York Times, 19 April.
57.
Morgenthau, H.J.1948. Politics among nations. New York: Knopf.
58.
Most, B., and H. Starr.1980. Diffusion, reinforcement, geo-politics, and the spread of war. American Journal of Political Science74: 932-946.
59.
Newman, D.1999. Real spaces, symbolic spaces: Interrelated notions of territory in the Arab-Israeli conflict. In P. F. Diehl, ed. A road map to war: Territorial dimensions of international conflict. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
60.
Organski, A.F.K., and J. Kugler.1980. The war ledger. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
61.
Posen, B.R.1993. The security dilemma and ethnic conflict. In M. E. Brown, ed. Ethnic conflict and international security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
Rajmaira, S., and M.D. Ward.1990. Evolving foreign policy norms: Reciprocity in the superpower triad. International Studies Quarterly34: 457-475.
63.
Rosecrance, R.1986. The rise of the trading state. New York: Basic Books.
64.
Rosenau, J.1966. Pre-theories and theories of foreign policy. In J. Rosenau, ed. Scientific study of foreign policy. New York, NY: Free Press .
65.
Rosenau, James.1967. Foreign policy as an issue area. In J. Rosenau, ed. Domestic sources of foreign policy. New York, NY: Free Press .
66.
Rothchild, D.1997. Secession is a last resort. Politics and the Life Sciences16: 270-272.
67.
Russett, B., and J. Oneal.2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York, NY: Norton.
68.
Sambanis, N.2000. Partition as a solution to ethnic war: An empirical critique of the theoretical literature. World Politics52: 437-483.
69.
Sack, R.1986. Territoriality: Its theory and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
70.
Schaeffer, R.K.1990. Warpaths: The politics of partition. New York: Hill and Wang.
71.
Senese, P.1999. Geographical proximity and issue salience: Their effects on the escalation of militarized interstate conflict. In P. F. Diehl, ed. A road map to war: Territorial dimensions of international conflict. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
72.
Senese, P.2005. Territory, contiguity, and international conflict: Assessing a new joint explanation. American Journal of Political Science49: 769-779.
73.
Senese, P., and J. Vasquez.2003. A unified explanation of territorial conflict: Testing the impact of sampling bias, 1919-1992. International Studies Quarterly47: 275-298.
74.
Signorino, C., and J. Ritter.1999. Tau-b or not tau-b: Measuring the similarity of foreign policy positions. International Studies Quarterly43: 115-144.
75.
Small, M., and J.D. Singer.1982. Resort to arms: International and civil wars, 1816-1980, 2nd ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
76.
Spykman, N.1944. The geography of peace. New York: Harcourt Brace.
77.
Stinnett, D., J. Tir, P. Shafer, P. Diehl, and C. Gochman.2002. The Correlates of War Project contiguity data. Conflict Management and Peace Science19: 59-68.
78.
Tir, J.2002. Letting secessionists have their way: Can partitions help end and prevent ethnic conflicts? International Interactions28: 261-292.
79.
Tir, J.2003. Averting armed international conflicts through state-to-state territorial transfers. Journal of Politics65: 1235-1257.
80.
Tir, J.2005a. Dividing countries to promote peace: Prospects for long-term success of partitions. Journal of Peace Research42: 545-562.
81.
Tir, J.2005b. Keeping the peace after secessions: Territorial conflicts between rump and secessionist states. Journal of Conflict Resolution49: 713-741.
82.
Tir, J.2006. Redrawing the map to promote peace: Territorial dispute Management via territorial changes. Lanham, MD : Lexington Books.
83.
Tir, J., P. Schafer, P.F. Diehl, and G. Goertz.1998. Territorial changes, 1816-1996: Procedures and data. Conflict Management and Peace Science16: 89-97.
84.
Thucydides.1993. The Melian dialogue. In P. Viotti and M. Kauppi, eds. Realism, pluralism, and globalism, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Macmillan.
85.
Touval, S.1972. The boundary politics of independent Africa. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
86.
Tullberg, J., and B.S. Tullberg.1997. Separation or unity? A model for solving ethnic conflicts. Politics and the Life Sciences16: 237-248.
87.
Vanzo, J.1999. Border configuration and conflict: Geographical compactness as a territorial ambition of states. In P. Diehl, ed. A road map to war: Territorial dimensions of international conflict. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
88.
Vasquez, J.1983. The tangibility of issues and global conflict: A test of Rosenau's issue area typology. Journal of Peace Research20: 179-192.
89.
Vasquez, J.1993. The war puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90.
Vasquez, J.1995. Why do neighbors fight? Proximity, interaction, and territoriality . Journal of Peace Research, 32: 277-293.
91.
Vasquez, J., and M. Henehan.2001. Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816-1992. Journal of Peace Research38:123-138.
92.
Waltz, K.1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.
93.
Young, R.A.1997. How do peaceful secessions happen? In D. Carment and P. James , eds. Wars in the midst of peace: The international politics of ethnic conflict. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
