Experiments used an affective priming procedure to investigate whether evaluative conditioning in humans is subject to bias as a consequence of differences in the learned predictiveness of the cues involved. Experiment 1, using brief prime presentation, demonstrated stronger affective priming for cues that had been predictive of a neutral attribute prior to evaluative conditioning than for those that had been nonpredictive. Experiment 2, using longer prime presentation, found a reversed priming effect for previously predictive cues but not for previously nonpredictive cues. The implication is that the effect observed with brief prime presentation reflects the operation of fast-acting, automatic evaluation mechanisms and hence that evaluative conditioning can be biased by our previous learning about the predictiveness of cues.
BaeyensF.De HouwerJ. (1995). Evaluative conditioning is a qualitatively distinct form of classical conditioning: A reply to Davey (1994).Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 825–831.
2.
BaeyensF.HermansD.EelenP. (1993). The role of CS–US contingency in human evaluative conditioning.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 731–737.
3.
BonardiC.GrahamS.HallG.MitchellC.J. (2005). Acquired distinctiveness and equivalence in human discrimination learning: Evidence for an attentional process.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 88–92.
4.
BoyF.SumnerP. (2010). Tight coupling between positive and reversed priming in the masked prime paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 892–905.
5.
DaveyG.C. L. (1994). Is evaluative conditioning a qualitatively distinct form of classical conditioning?.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 291–299.
6.
De HouwerJ. (2006). Using the implicit association test does not rule out an impact of conscious propositional knowledge on evaluative conditioning.Learning and Motivation, 37, 176–187.
7.
De HouwerJ.BaeyensF.FieldA.P. (2005). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: Some current controversies and possible ways forward.Cognition & Emotion, 19, 161–174.
8.
De HouwerJ.HermansD.EelenP. (1998). Affective and identity priming with episodically associated stimuli.Cognition and Emotion, 12, 145–169.
9.
De HouwerJ.ThomasS.BaeyensF. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning.Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869.
10.
DiazE.RuizG.BaeyensF. (2005). Resistance to extinction of human evaluative conditioning using a between-subjects design.Cognition & Emotion, 19, 245–268.
11.
DwyerD.M.JarrattF.DickK. (2007). Evaluative conditioning with foods as CSs and body shapes as USs: No evidence for sex differences, extinction, or overshadowing.Cognition and Emotion, 21, 281–299.
12.
EimerM.SchlagheckenF. (2003). Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming.Biological Psychology, 64, 7–26.
13.
FazioR.H. (2001). On the automatic activation of attitudes.Cognition & Emotion, 15, 115–141.
14.
FazioR.H.SanbonmatsuD.M.PowellM.C.KardesF.R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238.
15.
FieldA.P.MooreA.C. (2005). Dissociating the effects of attention and contingency awareness on evaluative conditioning effects in the visual paradigm.Cognition & Emotion, 19, 217–243.
16.
GriffithsO.Le PelleyM.E. (2009). Attentional changes in blocking are not a consequence of lateral inhibition.Learning & Behavior, 37, 27–41.
17.
HermansD.SpruytA.EelenP. (2003). Automatic affective priming of recently acquired stimulus valence: Priming at SOA 300 but not at SOA 1000.Cognition & Emotion, 17, 83–99.
18.
KlauerK.C.MeiserT. (2000). A source-monitoring analysis of illusory correlations.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1074–1093.
19.
KlauerK.C.MuschJ. (2003). Affective priming: Findings and theories.The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion, MuschJ.KlauerK.C.Mahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum Associates7–49.
20.
KlauerK.C.RoßnagelC.MuschJ. (1997). List-context effects in evaluative priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 23, 246–255.
21.
KlauerK.C.Teige-MocigembaS. (2007). Controllability and resource dependence in automatic evaluation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 648–655.
KruschkeJ.K. (2003). Attention in learning.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 171–175.
24.
Le PelleyM.E. (2004). The role of associative history in models of associative learning: A selective review and a hybrid model.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 193–243.
25.
Le PelleyM.E. (2010). Attention and human associative learning.Attention and associative learning: From brain to behaviour, MitchellC.J.Le PelleyM. E.Oxford, UKOxford University Press187–215.
26.
Le PelleyM.E.McLarenI.P. L. (2003). Learned associability and associative change in human causal learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 68–79.
27.
Le PelleyM.E.ReimersS.J.CalviniG.SpearsR.BeesleyT.MurphyR.A. (2010). Stereotype formation: Biased by association.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 138–161.
28.
Le PelleyM.E.TurnbullM.N.ReimersS.J.KnipeR.L. (2010). Learned predictiveness effects following single-cue training in humans.Learning & Behavior, 38, 126–144.
29.
LippO.V.NeumannD.L.MasonV. (2001). Stimulus competition in affective and relational learning.Learning and Motivation, 32, 306–331.
30.
LippO.V.OughtonN.LeLievreJ. (2003). Evaluative learning in human Pavlovian conditioning: Extinct, but still there?.Learning and Motivation, 34, 219–239.
31.
LippO.V.PurkisH.M. (2005). No support for dual process accounts of human affective learning in simple Pavlovian conditioning.Cognition & Emotion, 19, 269–282.
32.
MackintoshN.J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.
33.
MartinI.LeveyA. (1994). The evaluative response: Primitive but necessary.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 301–305.
34.
MitchellC. J.Le PelleyM. E. (Eds.). (2010). Attention and associative learning: From brain to behaviour, Oxford, UKOxford University Press.
35.
MoorsA.De HouwerJ. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297–326.
36.
OlsonM.A.FazioR.H. (2002). Implicit acquisition and manifestation of classically conditioned attitudes.Social Cognition, 20, 89–103.
37.
OwenA.M.RobertsA.C.PolkeyC.E.SahakianB.J.RobbinsT.W. (1991). Extra-dimensional versus intra-dimensional set shifting performance following frontal-lobe excisions, temporal-lobe excisions or amygdalo-hippocampectomy in man.Neuropsychologia, 29, 993–1006.
38.
PleyersG.CorneilleO.YzerbytV.LuminetO. (2009). Evaluative conditioning may incur attentional costs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 279–285.
39.
PosnerM.I.SnyderC. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control.Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium, SoloR. L.Hillsdale, NJLawrence Erlbaum Associates55–85.
40.
PurkisH.M.LippO.V. (2010). Stimulus competition in pre/post and online ratings in an evaluative learning design.Learning and Motivation, 41, 84–94.
41.
RozinP.MillmanL. (1987). Family environment, not heredity, accounts for family resemblances in food preferences and attitudes: A twin study.Appetite, 8, 125–134.
42.
SekulerR.BlakeR. (2005). Perception, New York, NYMcGraw-Hill.
43.
StahlC.UnkelbachC.CorneilleO. (2009). On the respective contributions of awareness of unconditioned stimulus valence and unconditioned stimulus identity in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 404–420.
44.
SumnerP. (2007). Negative and positive masked-priming: Implications for motor inhibition.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 317–326.
