Numerous studies in psychology, cognitive neuroscience and psycholinguistics have used pictures of objects as stimulus materials. Currently, authors engaged in cross-linguistic work or wishing to run parallel studies at multiple sites where different languages are spoken must rely on rather small sets of black-and-white or colored line drawings. These sets are increasingly experienced as being too limited. Therefore, we constructed a new set of 750 colored pictures of concrete concepts. This set, MultiPic, constitutes a new valuable tool for cognitive scientists investigating language, visual perception, memory and/or attention in monolingual or multilingual populations. Importantly, the MultiPic databank has been normed in six different European languages (British English, Spanish, French, Dutch, Italian and German). All stimuli and norms are freely available at http://www.bcbl.eu/databases/multipic.
AlarioF. X.FerrandL. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 531–552.
2.
BarryC.MorrisonC. M.EllisA. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 560–585.
BoninP.Guillemard-TsaparinaD.MéotA. (2013). Determinants of naming latencies, object comprehension times, and new norms for the Russian standardized set of the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 731–745.
5.
BoninP.PeeremanR.MalardierN.MéotA.ChalardM. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 158–167.
6.
BrodeurM. B.Dionne-DostieE.MontreuilT.LepageM. (2010). The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PLoS ONE, 5, Article e10773.
7.
BrodeurM. B.GuérardK.BourasM. (2014). Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS) Phase II: 930 new normative photos. PLoS ONE, 99(9), Article e106953.
8.
BrodeurM. B.KehayiaE.Dion-LessardG.ChauretM.MontreuilT.Dionne-DostieE.. . . LepageM. (2012). The bank of standardized stimuli (BOSS): comparison between French and English norms. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 961–970.
9.
CycowiczY. M.FriedmanD.RothsteinM.SnodgrassJ. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 171–237.
10.
Dell’AcquaR.LottoL.JobR. (2000). Naming times and standardized norms for the Italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 588–615.
11.
DimitropoulouM.DuñabeitiaJ. A.BlitsasP.CarreirasM. (2009). A standardized set of 260 pictures for Modern Greek: Norms for name agreement, age of acquisition, and visual complexity. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 584–589.
12.
DuchonA.PereaM.Sebastián-GallésN.MartíA.CarreirasM. (2013). EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1246–1258.
13.
HoeffdingW. (1948). A non-parametric test of independence. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 19, 293–325.
14.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
15.
LightR. J. (1971). Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 365–377.
ManoiloffL.ArtsteinM.CanavosoM.FernándezL.SeguiJ. (2010). Expanded norms for 400 experimental pictures in an Argentinean Spanish-speaking population. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 452–460.
18.
MarteinR. (1995). Norms for name and concept agreement, familiarity, visual complexity and image agreement on a set of 216 pictures. Psychologica Belgica, 35, 205–225.
19.
MathôtS.SchreijD.TheeuwesJ. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 442, 314–324.
20.
Moreno-MartínezF. J.MontoroP. R. (2012). An ecological alternative to Snodgrass & Vanderwart: 360 high quality colour images with norms for seven psycholinguistic variables. PLoS ONE, 7(5), Article e37527.
21.
NishimotoT.MiyawakiK.UedaT.UneY.TakahashiM. (2005). Japanese normative set of 359 pictures. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 398–416.
22.
O’SullivanM.LepageM.BourasM.MontreuilT.BrodeurM. B. (2012). North-American norms for name disagreement: Pictorial stimuli naming discrepancies. PLoS ONE, 7(10), Article e47802.
23.
RamanI.RamanE.MertanB. (2014). A standardized set of 260 pictures for Turkish: norms of name and image agreement, age of acquisition, visual complexity, and conceptual familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 588–595.
24.
RogićM.JerončićA.BošnjakM.SedlarA.HrenD.DeletisV. (2013). A visual object naming task standardized for the Croatian language: a tool for research and clinical practice. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1144–1158.
25.
RossionB.PourtoisG. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217–236.
26.
SanfeliuM. C.FernandezA. (1996). A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 537–555.
27.
ShannonC. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. In ShannonC. E.WeaverW. (Eds.), The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
28.
SnodgrassJ. G.VanderwartM. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174–215.
29.
SnodgrassJ. G.YuditskyT. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 516–536.
30.
SzékelyA.JacobsenT.D’AmicoS.DevescoviA.AndonovaE.HerronD.… BatesE. (2004). A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 247–250.
31.
TsaparinaD.BoninP.MéotA. (2011). Russian norms for name agreement, image agreement for the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures and age of acquisition, conceptual familiarity, and imageability scores for modal object names. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 1085–1099.
32.
ViggianoM. P.VannucciM.RighiS. (2004). A new standardized set of ecological pictures for experimental and clinical research on visual object processing. Cortex, 40, 491–509.
33.
WangL.ChenC.-W.ZhuL. (2014). Picture norms for Chinese preschool children: Name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. PLoS ONE, 9(3), Article e90450.
34.
YoonC.FeinbergF.LuoT.HeddenT.GutchessA. H.ChenH. Y.. . . ParkD. C. (2004). A cross-culturally standardized set of pictures for younger and older adults: American and Chinese norms for name agreement, concept agreement and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 639–649.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
