Keloids represent a symptomatic, aberrant healing process that is difficult to treat with high recurrence rates spanning from 55% to 100% if treated via excision without adjuvant therapy. Electrical stimulation (ES) has demonstrated findings that suggest it could reduce the recurrence rate of keloids after resection. Therefore, the aim of this study is to conduct a scoping review to investigate ES as an adjuvant therapy for decreasing keloid recurrence after excision.
Approach:
A scoping review was performed using PubMed and Web of Science databases. The search strategy encompassed terms linking keloids and various aspects of electrical stimulation.
Results:
Our search yielded 2,229 articles, of which 115 articles were analyzed as full text and 1 article met inclusion criteria. Despite this, ES has demonstrated other evidence that suggests its utility. ES has been shown to counter keloidic features by reducing mast cell counts, shifting wound composition from M2 to M1 macrophages, promoting angiogenesis, and controlling fibroblast orientation and location. An alternating current will orient fibroblasts perpendicular to the current without unintended migration.
Innovation:
Our study indicates that, based on a compilation of clinical and preclinical in vitro data, the optimal scenario for ES in the role of keloid treatment is after excision with a biphasic pulsed application and square waveform.
Conclusions:
ES could serve as a multifaceted, adjuvant treatment after keloid excision, steering the healing process away from keloid-associated characteristics. Its cost-effectiveness means it could be adopted globally, providing a strategy to mitigate the burden of keloids irrespective of other available treatments or economic conditions.
BetarbetU, BlalockTW. Keloids: A Review of etiology, prevention, and treatment. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol, 2020; 13(2):33–43.
3.
Datubo-BrownDD. Keloids: A review of the literature. Br J Plast Surg, 1990; 43(1):70–77; doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(90)90047-4
4.
LuW, ChuH, ZhengX. Effects on quality of life and psychosocial wellbeing in Chinese patients with keloids. Am J Transl Res, 2021; 13(3):1636–1642.
5.
OgawaR. Keloid and hypertrophic scars are the result of chronic inflammation in the reticular dermis. Int J Mol Sci, 2017; 18(3):606; doi: 10.3390/ijms18030606
6.
LimandjajaGC, NiessenFB, ScheperRJ, et al.The keloid disorder: Heterogeneity, histopathology, mechanisms and models. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2020; 8:360; doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00360
7.
OgawaR. An overview of the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of keloids. Eur Surg, 2012; 44(2):85–90; doi: 10.1007/s10353-011-0065-4
HongY, ChangY, LinY, et al.Inflammation in wound healing and pathological scarring. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2023; 12(5):288–300; doi: 10.1089/wound.2021.0161
12.
YounaiS, NichterLS, WelliszT, et al.Modulation of collagen synthesis by transforming growth factor-beta in keloid and hypertrophic scar fibroblasts. Ann Plast Surg, 1994; 33(2):148–151; doi: 10.1097/00000637-199408000-00005
13.
LeeC-C, TsaiC-H, ChenC-H, et al.An updated review of the immunological mechanisms of keloid scars. Front Immunol, 2023; 14:1117630; doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1117630
14.
YanL, CaoR, WangL, et al.Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in keloid tissues and TGF-β1-induced hair follicle outer root sheath keratinocytes. Wound Repair Regen, 2015; 23(4):601–610; doi: 10.1111/wrr.12320
15.
KuwaharaH, TosaM, EgawaS, et al.Examination of epithelial mesenchymal transition in keloid tissues and possibility of keloid therapy target. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2016; 4(11):e1138; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001138
ZhouB, TuT, GaoZ, et al.Impaired collagen fibril assembly in keloids with enhanced expression of lumican and collagen V. Arch Biochem Biophys, 2021; 697:108676; doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2020.108676
18.
StevensonAW, DengZ, AllahhamA, et al.The epigenetics of keloids. Exp Dermatol, 2021; 30(8):1099–1114; doi: 10.1111/exd.14414
19.
SuppDM. Animal models for studies of keloid scarring. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2019; 8(2):77–89; doi: 10.1089/wound.2018.0828
20.
LeeAR, LeeS-Y, ChoiJW, et al.Establishment of a humanized mouse model of keloid diseases following the migration of patient immune cells to the lesion: Patient-derived keloid xenograft (PDKX) model. Exp Mol Med, 2023; 55(8):1713–1719; doi: 10.1038/s12276-023-01045-6
21.
NevesLMG, WilgusTA, BayatA. In Vitro, Ex Vivo, and In Vivo approaches for investigation of skin scarring: Human and animal models. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2023; 12(2):97–116; doi: 10.1089/wound.2021.0139
22.
SuppDM, HahnJM, GlaserK, et al.Deep and superficial keloid fibroblasts contribute differentially to tissue phenotype in a novel in vivo model of keloid scar. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2012; 129(6):1259–1271; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ecaa9
23.
WorleyB, KimK, Jain-PosterK, et al.Treatment of traumatic hypertrophic scars and keloids: A systematic review of randomized control trials. Arch Dermatol Res, 2023; 315(7):1887–1896; doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02535-3
24.
LasproM, OnuhO, CohenR, et al.The role of radiation therapy in adult and pediatric keloid management a national survey of radiation oncologists. Ann Plast Surg, 2023; 91(2):215–219; doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003609
25.
ShekharK, MishraA, ShresthaE, et al.Intralesional steroids vs. liquid nitrogen cryotherapy vs. 595 nm pulsed dye laser in the management of chest keloids: A comparative study. Br J Dermatol, 2023; 188; doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad113.088
26.
BabuP, ThiruvothF, ChittoriaR. Intense pulsed light vs silicone gel sheet in the management of hypertrophic scars: An interventional comparative trial in the Indian population. J Cosmet Laser Ther, 2019; 21(4):234–237; doi: 10.1080/14764172.2018.1525741
27.
WuD, LiuX, JinZ. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells-sourced exosomal microRNA-7846-3p suppresses proliferation and pro-angiogenic role of keloid fibroblasts by suppressing neuropilin 2. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2023; 22(8):2333–2342; doi: 10.1111/jocd.15721
28.
LiuF, YuT, LiuJ, et al.IGFBP-7 secreted by adipose-derived stem cells inhibits keloid formation via the BRAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. J Dermatol Sci, 2023; 111(1):10–19; doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2023.05.004
29.
EksteinS, WylesS, MoranS, et al.Keloids: A review of therapeutic management. Int J Dermatol, 2020; 60(6):661–671; doi: 10.1111/ijd.15159
30.
OgawaR. The most current algorithms for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids: A 2020 update of the algorithms published 10 years ago. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2022; 149(1):79e–94e; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008667
31.
MemarianiH, MemarianiM, MoravvejH, et al.Emerging and novel therapies for keloids: A compendious review. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J, 2021; 21(1):e22–e33; doi: 10.18295/squmj.2021.21.01.004
32.
GiuglianoG, PasqualiD, NotaroA, et al.Verapamil inhibits interleukin-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor production in primary cultures of keloid fibroblasts. Br J Plast Surg, 2003; 56(8):804–809; doi: 10.1016/S0007-1226(03)00384-9
33.
DilmaghaniS, BehrangiE, MazandaraniM, et al.Needling, lasers, and Meso-Botox for hypertrophic and keloidal scars: A comprehensive review study on promising procedural treatments. J Family Med Prim Care, 2022; 11(8):4195–4204; doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1657_21
34.
PhanK, YounessiS, DubinD, et al.Emerging off-label esthetic uses of botulinum toxin in dermatology. Dermatol Ther, 2022; 35(1):e15205; doi: 10.1111/dth.15205
35.
HuncklerJ, De MelA. A current affair: Electrotherapy in wound healing. J Multidiscip Healthc, 2017; 10:179–194; doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S127207
36.
IsseroffRR, DahleSE. Electrical stimulation therapy and wound healing: Where are we now? Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2012; 1(6):238–243; doi: 10.1089/wound.2011.0351
37.
Ud-DinS, BayatA. Electrical stimulation and cutaneous wound healing: A review of clinical evidence. Healthcare (Basel), 2014; 2(4):445–467; doi: 10.3390/healthcare2040445
38.
VermaN, LeT, MudgeJ, et al.Efficacy of bone stimulators in large-animal models and humans may be limited by weak electric fields reaching fracture. Sci Rep, 2022; 12(1):21798; doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1805225/v1
39.
VanceCG, DaileyDL, RakelBA, et al.Using TENS for pain control: The state of the evidence. Pain Manag, 2014; 4(3):197–209; doi: 10.2217/pmt.14.13
40.
CoganSF. Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 2008; 10:275–309; doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160518
41.
Anonymous. Extracellular Stimulation of Central Neurons: Influence of Stimulus Waveform and Frequency on Neuronal Output. J Neurophysiol, 2002; 88(4):1592–1604; doi: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.4.1592
42.
PerryD, ColthurstJ, GiddingsP, et al.Treatment of symptomatic abnormal skin scars with electrical stimulation. J Wound Care, 2010; 19(10):447–453; doi: 10.12968/jowc.2010.19.10.79092
43.
SebastianA, SyedF, McGroutherDA, et al.A novel in vitro assay for electrophysiological research on human skin fibroblasts: Degenerate electrical waves downregulate collagen I expression in keloid fibroblasts. Exp Dermatol, 2011; 20(1):64–68; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2010.01150.x
44.
Ud-DinS, Giddings DipP, ColthurstJ, et al.Significant reduction of symptoms of scarring with electrical stimulation: Evaluated with subjective and objective assessment tools in a prospective noncontrolled case series. Wounds Compend Clin Res Pract, 2013; 25(8):212–224.
45.
SebastianA, AllanE, AllanD, et al.Addition of novel degenerate electrical waveform stimulation with photodynamic therapy significantly enhances its cytotoxic effect in keloid fibroblasts: First report of a potential combination therapy. J Dermatol Sci, 2011; 64(3):174–184; doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2011.08.012
46.
BeausangE, FloydH, DunnKW, et al.A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1998; 102(6):1954–1961; doi: 10.1097/00006534-199811000-00022
47.
ZhaoM, BaiH, WangE, et al.Electrical stimulation directly induces pre-angiogenic responses in vascular endothelial cells by signaling through VEGF receptors. J Cell Sci, 2004; 117(Pt 3):397–405; doi: 10.1242/jcs.00868
48.
MachadoAFP, SantanaEF, TacaniPM, et al.The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on tissue repair: A literature review. Can J Plast Surg, 2012; 20(4):237–240.
49.
TorresAS, CaiafaA, GarnerAL, et al.Platelet activation using electric pulse stimulation: Growth factor profile and clinical implications. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2014; 77(3 Suppl 2):S94–S100; doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000322
HoughtonPE, CampbellKE, FraserCH, et al.Electrical stimulation therapy increases rate of healing of pressure ulcers in community-dwelling people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2010; 91(5):669–678; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.12.026
52.
Ud-DinS, PerryD, GiddingsP, et al.Electrical stimulation increases blood flow and haemoglobin levels in acute cutaneous wounds without affecting wound closure time: Evidenced by non-invasive assessment of temporal biopsy wounds in human volunteers. Exp Dermatol, 2012; 21(10):758–764; doi: 10.1111/exd.12005
53.
Ud-DinS, SebastianA, GiddingsP, et al.Angiogenesis is induced and wound size is reduced by electrical stimulation in an acute wound healing model in human skin. PLoS One, 2015; 10(4):e0124502; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124502
SenCK. Human wound and its burden: Updated 2020 compendium of estimates. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2021; 10(5):281–292; doi: 10.1089/wound.2021.0026
56.
QaseemA, HumphreyLL, ForcieaMA, et al.Treatment of pressure ulcers: A clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med, 2015; 162(5):370–379; doi: 10.7326/M14-1568
57.
KhouriC, KotzkiS, RoustitM, et al.Hierarchical evaluation of electrical stimulation protocols for chronic wound healing: An effect size meta-analysis. Wound Repair Regen, 2017; 25(5):883–891; doi: 10.1111/wrr.12594
58.
AshrafiM, Alonso-RasgadoT, BaguneidM, et al.The efficacy of electrical stimulation in lower extremity cutaneous wound healing: A systematic review. Exp Dermatol, 2017; 26(2):171–178; doi: 10.1111/exd.13179
59.
BlountAL, FosterS, RappDA, et al.The use of bioelectric dressings in skin graft harvest sites: A prospective case series. J Burn Care Res, 2012; 33(3):354–357; doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31823356e4
60.
GomesRC, GuirroECO, GonçalvesAC, et al.High-voltage electric stimulation of the donor site of skin grafts accelerates the healing process. A randomized blinded clinical trial. Burns, 2018; 44(3):636–645; doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.10.006
61.
FerreiraCL, Neves JardiniMA, Moretto NunesCM, et al.Electrical stimulation enhances early palatal wound healing in mice. Arch Oral Biol, 2021; 122:105028; doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.105028
62.
Avendaño-CoyJ, López-MuñozP, Serrano-MuñozD, et al.Electrical microcurrent stimulation therapy for wound healing: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Tissue Viability, 2022; 31(2):268–277; doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.12.002
63.
BuoteNJ. Updates in wound management and dressings. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract, 2022; 52(2):289–315; doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2021.12.001
64.
MarttalaJ, AndrewsJP, RosenbloomJ, et al.Keloids: Animal models and pathologic equivalents to study tissue fibrosis. Matrix Biol, 2016; 51:47–54; doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.01.014
65.
VarhusJD. A novel bioelectric device enhances wound healing: An equine case series. J Equine Vet Sci, 2014; 34(3):421–430; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2013.07.011
66.
JangH-K, OhJY, JeongG-J, et al.A disposable photovoltaic patch controlling cellular microenvironment for wound healing. Int J Mol Sci, 2018; 19(10):3025; doi: 10.3390/ijms19103025
67.
LinY-H, LiuE-W, LinY-J, et al.The synergistic effect of electrical stimulation and dermal fibroblast cells-laden 3d conductive hydrogel for full-thickness wound healing. Int J Mol Sci, 2023; 24(14):11698; doi: 10.3390/ijms241411698
68.
GuJ, HeX, ChenX, et al.Effects of electrical stimulation on cytokine-induced macrophage polarization. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2022; 16(5):448–459; doi: 10.1002/term.3292
69.
ReichJD, CazzanigaAL, MertzPM, et al.The effect of electrical stimulation on the number of mast cells in healing wounds. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1991; 25(1 Pt 1):40–46; doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70171-W
70.
FinkelsteinE, ChangW, ChaoP-HG, et al.Roles of microtubules, cell polarity and adhesion in electric-field-mediated motility of 3T3 fibroblasts. J Cell Sci, 2004; 117(Pt 8):1533–1545; doi: 10.1242/jcs.00986
71.
MéthotS, MoulinV, RancourtD, et al.Morphological changes of human skin cells exposed to a DC electric field in vitro using a new exposure system. Can J Chem Eng, 2001; 79(4):668–677; doi: 10.1002/cjce.5450790428
72.
GuoA, SongB, ReidB, et al.Effects of physiological electric fields on migration of human dermal fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol, 2010; 130(9):2320–2327; doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.96
73.
LiuJ, GuoX, RenX, et al.A novel FPCL model producing directional contraction through induction of fibroblast alignment by biphasic pulse direct current electric field. Exp Cell Res, 2018; 371(2):426–434; doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.09.003
74.
Hernández-BuleML, TrilloMÁ, ÚbedaA. Molecular mechanisms underlying antiproliferative and differentiating responses of hepatocarcinoma cells to subthermal electric stimulation. PLoS One, 2014; 9(1):e84636; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084636
75.
RouabhiaM, ParkH, MengS, et al.Electrical stimulation promotes wound healing by enhancing dermal fibroblast activity and promoting myofibroblast transdifferentiation. PLoS One, 2013; 8(8):e71660; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071660
76.
JinQ, GuiL, NiuF, et al.Macrophages in keloid are potent at promoting the differentiation and function of regulatory T cells. Exp Cell Res, 2018; 362(2):472–476; doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.12.011
77.
LiX, WangY, YuanB, et al.Status of M1 and M2 type macrophages in keloid. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2017; 10(11):11098–11105.
AmmendolaM, ZuccalàV, PatrunoR, et al.Tryptase-positive mast cells and angiogenesis in keloids: A new possible post-surgical target for prevention. Updates Surg, 2013; 65(1):53–57; doi: 10.1007/s13304-012-0183-y
81.
LeeS, KimE, SeoH, et al.IL-17 induced stromal cell-derived factor-1 and profibrotic factor in keloid-derived skin fibroblasts via the STAT3 pathway. Inflammation, 2020; 43(2):664–672; doi: 10.1007/s10753-019-01148-1
82.
TosaM, WatanabeA, GhazizadehM. IL-6 Polymorphism and susceptibility to keloid formation in a Japanese population. J Invest Dermatol, 2016; 136(5):1069–1072; doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.01.019
83.
PavlovVA, TraceyKJ. The vagus nerve and the inflammatory reflex—linking immunity and metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 2012; 8(12):743–754; doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.189
84.
Bravo-IñiguezCE, FritzJR, ShuklaS, et al.Vagus nerve stimulation primes platelets and reduces bleeding in hemophilia A male mice. Nat Commun, 2023; 14(1):3122; doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38505-6
