Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

To identify if a lecture or access to a computer aided learning (CAL) programme is more effective in teaching undergraduate dental students IOTN.

Design

Prospective controlled trial.

Setting

University Dental Hospital of Manchester, 1999

Subjects

Eighty-five 3rd year undergraduate dental students allocated by pseudo-randomisation to two groups. The first group received a lecture and seminar on IOTN, and the second group were given a seminar and access to a purpose written CAL programme.

Main Outcome Measure

A standard test was given to the two groups in the form of ten sets of patient records that they had to score with IOTN Dental Health Component (DHC) and Aesthetic Component (AC).

Results

There was no difference in mean score for the two groups with AC score (5•02 and 5•03). The CAL group of students performed best for DHC grade (mean score 5•41 compared with 4•24 for lecture group) and this was statistically significant (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Undergraduate dental students can learn to use IOTN as well or better when using a CAL programme compared with a lecture.

Keywords

Computer aided learning IOTN Teaching method Undergraduate

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bachman

M. W.

, Lua

M. J.

, Clay

D. J.

and Rudney

M. A.

(1998) Comparing traditional vs computer-based instruction for oral anatomy, Journal of Dental Education, 62, 587–591.

Bearn

, Wright

, Kay

and O'Brien

K. D.

(1996) Perceptions of orthodontic treatment need: Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 24, 1–4.

Boyd

(1997) Design for Multimedia Learning,Prentice Hall, Europe, London.

Brook

P. H.

and Shaw

W. C.

(1989) The development of an index of orthodontic priority, European Journal of Orthodontics, 11, 309–320.

Clarke

R. D.

, Weerakone

and Rock

W. P.

(1997) A hypertext tutorial for teaching cephalometrics, British Journal of Orthodontics, 24, 325–328.

Cohen

P. A.

and Dacanay

L. S.

(1992) Computer based instruction and health professions education. A meta-analysis of outcomes, Evaluation and The Health Professions, 15, 259–281.

Dacanay

L. S.

and Cohen

P. A.

(1992) A meta-analysis of individualized instruction in dental education, Journal of Dental Education, 56, 183–189.

Downes

P. K.

and Eaton

K. A.

(1997) The evaluation of SafeQuest—a computer-aided learning program on cross-infection control for the dental team, British Dental Journal, 183, 333–337.

Hobson

R. S.

, Carter

N. E.

, Hall

F. M.

and Atkins

M. J.

(1998) A study into the effectiveness of a text-based computer-aided learning program in comparison with seminar teaching of orthodontics, European Journal of Dental Education, 2, 154–159.

10.

Holmes

and Willmot

D. R.

(1996) The Consultant Orthodontists Group 1994 survey of the use of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), British Journal of Orthodontics, 23, 57–59.

11.

Irvine

N. R.

and Moore

R. N.

(1986) Computer-aided instruction in mixed dentition analysis, Journal of Dental Education, 50, 312–315.

12.

Jones

(1992) A comparative study of three teaching packages to teach the index of orthodontic treatment need, MSc thesis, University of Manchester.

13.

Kulik

J. A.

, Kulik

C. C.

and Cohen

P. A.

(1980) Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: a meta-analysis of findings, Review of Educational Research, 50, 525–544.

14.

Levine

R. S.

, Harold-Jones

and Morgan

(1987) Comparison of computer-aided learning with tutorial teaching in a group of first-year dental students, Medical Education, 21, 305–309.

15.

Long

A. F.

, Mercer

P. E.

, Stephens

C. D.

and Grigg

(1994) The evaluation of three computer-aided learning packages for general dental practitioners, British Dental Journal, 177, 410–415.

16.

Luffingham

J. K.

(1984) An assessment of computer-aided learning in orthodontics, British Journal of Orthodontics, 11, 205–208.

17.

Office of National Statistics/Government Statistical Service (1999a) The UK in Figures: standard of living, Stationery Office, London.

18.

Office of National Statistics/Government Statistical Service (1999b) Use of Computers in Secondary School Departments: by subject and year group, 1998: social trends dataset, Stationery Office, London.

19.

Pollard

D. J.

and Davenport

J. C.

(1994) An evaluation of training general dental practitioners in partial denture design using a computer-aided learning program, British Dental Journal, 177, 405–409.

20.

Richmond

, Buchanan

I. B

, Burden

D. J.

, O'Brien

K. D.

, Andrews

, Roberts

C. T.

and Turbill

E. A.

(1995) Calibration of dentists in the use of occlusal indices, Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 23, 173–176.

21.

Stephens

C. D.

and Dowell

T. B.

(1983) The acceptability of computer-aided instruction to the undergraduate, British Dental Journal, 154, 375.

22.

Turner

P. J.

and Weerakone

(1993) An evaluation of a hypertext system for computer-aided learning in orthodontics, British Journal of Orthodontics, 20, 145–148.

Computer-aided Learning (CAL): An Effective Way to Teach the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN)?

Abstract

Objective

Design

Setting

Subjects

Main Outcome Measure

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References